Comments Thread For: Arum: I Look Forward To Matching Haney-Kambosos Winner With Lomachenko
Collapse
-
But loma fought him and not Haney. Teo didn’t fight Haney. No one was willing to fight Haney.
So its clear who the “terror” was if you’re objective and looking at what actually happened.Leave a comment:
-
I think Haney is too big for him, and his reach is too long. I believe Devin keep him on the outside with the jab and use movement and quick combinations to create distance. With Loma's short arms and the size difference, he's going to have to take a lot of chances to get inside, and even if he does, his power doesn't carry from 130, and we know Haney is the clinching and hugging master. Then he goes right back outside with the jab. I wanted Tank to get to him before Devin, but whatever, Haney by unanimous decision.Leave a comment:
-
Just make your prediction bro, that's all. Who do you think wins in the Haney vs Lomachenko fight? We'll take it from there.
I don't know whether you are referring to me or the other guy, but if its me, I would give credit to the winner of Loma vs Haney, but if its Kambosas, no because Loma would definitely outclass him. As far as my agenda being personal or shallow, I am only stating the facts, its its nothing personal. I would actually root for him against Kambosas. Also, there is nothing shallow about speaking out against corruptionLeave a comment:
-
I don't know whether you are referring to me or the other guy, but if its me, I would give credit to the winner of Loma vs Haney, but if its Kambosas, no because Loma would definitely outclass him. As far as my agenda being personal or shallow, I am only stating the facts, its its nothing personal. I would actually root for him against Kambosas. Also, there is nothing shallow about speaking out against corruptionSo now the winner gets to fight Lomachenko. End of story.
Real question is would you give proper credit to the last man standing? (Winner of the [Kambo vs Haney] vs Lomachenko)
Point is it's going to happen. So you better stop this anti/pro nonsense of yours just because you don't like the fighter and you have this consistent personal agenda based purely on shallow things.
Leave a comment:
-
breathe....
Loma has 2 losses in 18 fights, he shouldn't be on there at all. He has been hand-held since he turned pro. He was ushered down the red carpet to a championship fight in his 3rd fight after LOSING his first. He didn't have to earn his shot for a belt like Floyd, Crawford, Shakur, or the other top contenders. He has been treated with privilege from the start. Just because he's not American doesn't mean he received less praise; look at the amount of praise for Usyk, Fury, GGG, and especially Canelo.
angry-tantrum.gifLeave a comment:
-
So now the winner gets to fight Lomachenko. End of story.
Real question is would you give proper credit to the last man standing? (Winner of the [Kambo vs Haney] vs Lomachenko)
Point is it's going to happen. So you better stop this anti/pro nonsense of yours just because you don't like the fighter and you have this consistent personal agenda based purely on shallow things.Leave a comment:
-
You are a delusional Loma fanatic. You are going down the thread and attacking and insulting anyone that doesn't follow your weak narrative. You constant excuses for your idol have grown stale and tiresome. He's a hand-held fighter, yes is skilled, but he didn't have to earn his way to titles shots, he was driven to them in a limousine by corruption. If Floyd, Crawford, or Shakur were given a championship fight in their 3rd fight after losing their first, the boxing world would scream for bloody murder.
Liar...point blank ****** as **** liar. I was there the whole way, way before Haney got involved. You just can't make up this ****. First time Haney called out Loma was after Loma won against Cambell. Loma was being lined up to fight Kamboses as a fill in fight, after he beat Campbell. Haney wasn't Mando yet. Haney fought after Loma won the belt from Campbell. After Haney won and came out and said, hey why not fight me and not Kamboses. Loma had already at this point decided to not take a filler and fight for the 4th belt. A Mando was not called and demanded because Loma had just won the belt and because a Mando could not be ordered because of the going for Undisputed next. This is when Haney was chirping in the media. Haney had no reason to fight Loma ever before this. Loma said I will fight for the 4th belt and after I want Tank first and then Haney second. Franchise was not even in the conversation at this point. Franchise had no bearing of a Mando not being called, demanded. Any other take is conspiracy, conjecture without proof, lies and made up facts.Leave a comment:
-
Loma has 2 losses in 18 fights, he shouldn't be on there at all. He has been hand-held since he turned pro. He was ushered down the red carpet to a championship fight in his 3rd fight after LOSING his first. He didn't have to earn his shot for a belt like Floyd, Crawford, Shakur, or the other top contenders. He has been treated with privilege from the start. Just because he's not American doesn't mean he received less praise; look at the amount of praise for Usyk, Fury, GGG, and especially Canelo.Leave a comment:
-
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
It's the easiest fight to make after the rematch. Lomachenko vs the winner.
Sad bit is. If it's Kambosos, he's gonna get highlight reeled. Lmfao.
If it's Haney, that Klitschko textbook boxing ain't gonna work either. He's gonna have to fight different. Cause Lomachenko isn't getting jabbed to a UD. He's gonna slip and pop and move.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: