Comments Thread For: Second Usyk Loss, Post-Fight Tantrum Prompts Revisionist Joshua History

[OldTerry]

Why not Fury? Fury hasn’t shown anything that indicates either Joshua or Usyk couldn’t beat him. He talks a good game but he’s barely ever willing to take a fight. Y’all believe his self promoting gypsy talk tactics. He still has more to prove than fighting Deontay Wilder three times in a row can prove for me. He’s a good fighter but he’s a also a conman that retires twice a year. Let’s see him fight more than talk and maybe my perception of him will change.

I believe Fury beats both Joshua and Usyk but regardless, he is what you say, which is a con man. Fury's true motivation is (despite what he says) the big pot of Gold at the end of the rainbow.

[MONGOOSE66]

By Lyle Fitzsimmons - It'd be hard to find a bigger Anthony Joshua fan than I was. Though wiping out the worst title claimant of a generation (Charles Martin, blech!) wasn't exactly the most compelling way to win a heavyweight title, I remember sitting in the press room at the MGM Grand Garden Arena that spring night in 2016 thinking, "OK, this guy's going to be a big star."
[Click Here To Read More]

So what! I don’t know whose more dramatic AJ or the women on here. Y’all got nerve to call out AJ for acting like a biatch when 80% of the posters on here could give him lessons.

[sammybee]

Usyk should fight Wilder if Fury doesn't come back from his retirement.

[BritJimbo]

Yes, I'd like to see a Joshua/Wilder fight too. You made the comment that "TBH, if he were to beat, say, Wilder, regain a title and make a few defenses, he will have a legit shot at the HOF", if Wilder were to win that fight would you say the same about Wilder?

I think so...it wasnt that long ago, at least until Andy Ruiz came along, that AJ and Wilder was the big fight...things have changed a little.