Originally posted by Cyborg Fangerloo
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Froch: Fury is Best at Heavyweight, Uses His Weight Effectively, He Can Beat Usyk
Collapse
-
shwaap likes this.
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post———-
Why are you so angry? Fury has clearly gotten your head.
When Fury beats Usyk and perhaps Joyce, will there really be a need to fight AJ?
Wilder would blast AJ out the ring if they fought so would that make Wilder an ATG?
Is it possible to respond without making it personal?
Comment
-
Originally posted by alexjust View Post
Of course it is. But isn't any critique of a boxer would feel personal? At the end of the day we pick on their skills and personalities, how is it not personal? I appreciate your projections, but they are just that - projections. Tyson was projected to beat Douglas. I was sure Loma would beat Lopez. Until Fury actually clears out the division it's OK to be agnostic as to his ATG status. Yes, I see the ATG potential in him, but it's up to him to realize his potential and prove it to the boxing world. That's how you become ATG, believe it or not. Not by assumptions or the opinion of the the god-like Froch and the like. So, let him "unretire" and show how he would fare against Usyk. Hell, I'll even say he'll be the favorite.
Old era HWs like Liston and Frazier have far worse resumes, just to keep the examples brief.
Beating Usyk makes him the GOAT.
Sorry, I do not think sloppy, slow, inaccurate 220 lbs bully Foreman would be much chop today.
Comment
-
Fury has a chance for legacy, to own all 4 belts at the same time at heavyweight, to make history. It's at his finger tips. What does this supposed great fighter do in that situation? He retires after Usyk beat AJ, the first time. Spouts in the media how great he is and every other boxer is a tosser. But he jests. His actions are what you pay attention to. Past all his bs words that he spouts, he doesn't like the potential odds of getting that first loss against Usyk. Fury does badly agaisnt guys who can move and he sees a potential loss against a much smaller Usyk. Fury's actions speak much, much larger than his bloated hyperbolic words. Point blank. The man is full of hot air.Last edited by TDLand; 08-21-2022, 12:05 PM.shwaap likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by alexjust View Post
Of course it is. But isn't any critique of a boxer would feel personal? At the end of the day we pick on their skills and personalities, how is it not personal? I appreciate your projections, but they are just that - projections. Tyson was projected to beat Douglas. I was sure Loma would beat Lopez. Until Fury actually clears out the division it's OK to be agnostic as to his ATG status. Yes, I see the ATG potential in him, but it's up to him to realize his potential and prove it to the boxing world. That's how you become ATG, believe it or not. Not by assumptions or the opinion of the the god-like Froch and the like. So, let him "unretire" and show how he would fare against Usyk. Hell, I'll even say he'll be the favorite.
This is a compelling argument and I do appreciate it.
To your point, I too was sure that Wilder would destroy Fury the first time. I was so sure of it that I bet on it.
I usually do my best not to critique a boxer on a personal level unless it’s someone like Broner. Any gripe or praise about the skill sets or mistakes, I think that’s fair.
What I disagree with is the idea that Fury needs to beat AJ to be great. I think we both can agree that at this point in his career, AJ is just an elite gatekeeper. I’d also wager that Wilder would be the favorite to win if they were to fight.
Comment
-
"FuRy Is ThE bEsT hW" says plonker who couldn't even beat Andre Ward when he was fighting with one handed.
The standards for Fury are all-time low: All he has to do is beat Klitschko (40 years old) and Wilder (Not ranked P4P) and he's the best.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post———
This is a compelling argument and I do appreciate it.
To your point, I too was sure that Wilder would destroy Fury the first time. I was so sure of it that I bet on it.
I usually do my best not to critique a boxer on a personal level unless it’s someone like Broner. Any gripe or praise about the skill sets or mistakes, I think that’s fair.
What I disagree with is the idea that Fury needs to beat AJ to be great. I think we both can agree that at this point in his career, AJ is just an elite gatekeeper. I’d also wager that Wilder would be the favorite to win if they were to fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TDLand View PostFury has a chance for legacy, to own all 4 belts at the same time at heavyweight, to make history. It's at his finger tips. What does this supposed great fighter do in that situation? He retires after Usyk beat AJ, the first time. Spouts in the media how great he is and every other boxer is a tosser. But he jests. His actions are what you pay attention to. Past all his bs words that he spouts, he doesn't like the potential odds of getting that first loss against Usyk. Fury does badly agaisnt guys who can move and he sees a potential loss against a much smaller Usyk. Fury's actions speak much, much larger than his bloated hyperbolic words. Point blank. The man is full of hot air.
Comment
Comment