question..why is winky in the middleweight rankings when he has never fought at middleweight before i know he is going to fight tito but he hasnt yet
As always the WBC ratings are a joke.
Collapse
-
-
I see. But I think it would be good for boxing if they did have mandatories who were other belt holders. It would make unification mandatory after enough time. But I know this would and could not happen. There needs to be several belts held by several people and occasional unification. It allows for more 'title fights'. I wish there were just the Ring Belt or if you don't like the Ring rankins just one organization that gave out one belt an no others.Originally posted by PRboxingfanI think it's kind of "you're already a champ so no need in ranking you and making you a mandatory for my organization since that would only lead to champions fighting each other and not giving a shot to anyone below them" type of deal. Think of it, if they ranked the champs then they would only fight themselves as mandatories. That's not good for boxing.Comment
-
Originally posted by SturmRulesquestion..why is winky in the middleweight rankings when he has never fought at middleweight before i know he is going to fight tito but he hasnt yet
Because of his bout with Trinidad.Comment
-
Comment
Comment