Canelo is like Mike Tyson
Collapse
-
-
It's a 15 count. Tyson hadn't gone to jail yet, basic boxing history you should know this?
It's a ten count, not a ten second count so your 'proof' is redundant. You're attempting to cover both bases by saying he lost because of his personal life but didn't actually lose anyway because of a 'long count'. I actually thought you would have something more substantive to say but it's just the standard apologetics I've read on forums for years which is I tend not to participate (hence low post count).
Your low post count is because your an alt and a shitty one at that.
Why don't you go edge yourself with some tweezers and relax, you're extremely high strung.
Comment
-
It was a ten count that you think was erroneous because it supposedly lasted 15 seconds. It's a fatuous argument.
I didn't say he'd gone to prison, I said you were claiming Tyson had lost because of his personal life (but also claiming he didn't lose because of the 'long count').
I'm not an alt, you've just spent too much time on forums arguing with other factional/emotional morons and paranoia has set in. You've allowed your illusory 'rep' on here to become a part of your identity - none of this matters. If you're not an edgelord then my thread doesn't apply to you, right?Comment
-
Fatuous, wow that's like a 5 dollar word. Who the fuck says fatuous IRL? Uhm, like nobody that's not trying to sound like a pompous prickstain.
It was a ten count that you think was erroneous because it supposedly lasted 15 seconds. It's a fatuous argument.
I didn't say he'd gone to prison, I said you were claiming Tyson had lost because of his personal life (but also claiming he didn't lose because of the 'long count').
I'm not an alt, you've just spent too much time on forums arguing with other factional/emotional morons and paranoia has set in. You've allowed your illusory 'rep' on here to become a part of your identity - none of this matters. If you're not an edgelord then my thread doesn't apply to you, right?
It's not SILLY or POINTLESS, the POINT is Mike didn't lose that fight because the count was 15 seconds. Knock a man down for 10 seconds, you win by knockout. FACTS.
I know what you said and you said You're attempting to cover both bases by saying he lost because of his personal life but didn't actually lose anyway because of a 'long count' so I referred to the jail time to keep it in context. You do understand CONTEXT right?
The edgelord is extreme cringe tryhard wannabe. Like I said before, go edge yourself off because you're obviously in love with yourself.
368 posts in 13 years =---> OBVIOUS ALT.Comment
-
-
Capitalised words and punctuating an opinion with 'facts' (not even 'fact' which would still be wrong but at least grammatically acceptable). You've revealed yourself as emotionally invested in a convicted rapist and violent drug abuser who happened to be good at boxing 30 years ago. Nice work.
Fatuous, wow that's like a 5 dollar word. Who the *********** says fatuous IRL? Uhm, like nobody that's not trying to sound like a pompous prickstain.
It's not SILLY or POINTLESS, the POINT is Mike didn't lose that fight because the count was 15 seconds. Knock a man down for 10 seconds, you win by knockout. FACTS.
I know what you said and you said You're attempting to cover both bases by saying he lost because of his personal life but didn't actually lose anyway because of a 'long count' so I referred to the jail time to keep it in context. You do understand CONTEXT right?
The edgelord is extreme cringe tryhard wannabe. Like I said before, go edge yourself off because you're obviously in love with yourself.
368 posts in 13 years =---> OBVIOUS ALT.Comment
-
pretty much, both look/looked great against plodders who stand right in front of them. tyson is a legendary figure in the sport but more for his story than anything, as with most fighters there were excuses every time he lost but he was the only fighter i know who was apparently past prime at 23 lol. if it was because he was partying too much or whatever then its his own fault cant just make up that he'd have beaten everyone if he was 100 percent committed.Comment
-
This isn't a term paper homeskillet.
Capitalised words and punctuating an opinion with 'facts' (not even 'fact' which would still be wrong but at least grammatically acceptable). You've revealed yourself as emotionally invested in a convicted rapist and violent drug abuser who happened to be good at boxing 30 years ago. Nice work.
People get wrongly convicted all the time. Boxers are violent by nature, congratulations Captain Obvious! Who hasn't done drugs besides you?Comment
-
Wrong as usual. Knock a man down for a 10 count you win. Seconds don’t enter into the equation. Yet another example of your low boxing IQ.
Fatuous, wow that's like a 5 dollar word. Who the *********** says fatuous IRL? Uhm, like nobody that's not trying to sound like a pompous prickstain.
It's not SILLY or POINTLESS, the POINT is Mike didn't lose that fight because the count was 15 seconds. Knock a man down for 10 seconds, you win by knockout. FACTS.
I know what you said and you said You're attempting to cover both bases by saying he lost because of his personal life but didn't actually lose anyway because of a 'long count' so I referred to the jail time to keep it in context. You do understand CONTEXT right?
The edgelord is extreme cringe tryhard wannabe. Like I said before, go edge yourself off because you're obviously in love with yourself.
368 posts in 13 years =---> OBVIOUS ALT.Comment
-
Lol what? Pre tyson prison was the undisputed champion when was canelo ever undisputed in his weight class? When did canelo ever destroy a top 3 p4p fighter like spinks in 1 rd or even clearly dominate a p4p fighter? Never. He couldn't even clearly beat a guy 10 older than him in ggg. LMA0Last edited by satiev1; 07-10-2022, 02:26 PM.Comment
Comment