Canelo is like Mike Tyson

[Silence]

Only a lunatic would utter such a thing. Caneloroid is nowhere near Tyson's best.

Canelo is more well-rounded fighter than Tyson. He is better boxer. Has much deeper resume. He got lots of ATGs' style in his style including Tyson's himself.

Also, Tyson appreciates Canelo and fan of his fighting style.

[Silence]

BodyBagz who is bigger hypejob GGGeezer or Tyson?

[Century Tuna]

Canelo is more well-rounded fighter than Tyson. He is better boxer. Has much deeper resume. He got lots of ATGs' style in his style including Tyson's himself.

Also, Tyson appreciates Canelo and fan of his fighting style.

Canelo also appreciates Tyson's strength. Since you mentioned "many of ATGs' style," could you list them? Tyson is a far superior fighter than Canelo. Canelo is nothing without the tainted beef and PEDS.

[War Room]

Haggler got robbed in his fight with Leonard.

Hagler lost fair and square. He let the first half of the fight go.

How so, could you elaborate for me?

I'm talking about Tyson, when he lost big fights there was valid reasons behind it in what was going on in his personal life.

You can say that for any supposed all time great.

Roy Jones stepped up and got whooped by Tarver.

Ggg whooped when stepped up to canelo.

Jones beat Tarver the first time and Tarver wasn't a step up. GGG won both fights, come on now.

[dan-b]

I'm talking about Tyson, when he lost big fights there was valid reasons behind it in what was going on in his personal life.

This is emotional fanboy apologetics. People always have stuff going on, they're just not all as self-pitying and emotionally incontinent as Tyson is. I'll just about accept it as an excuse for the Douglas loss (Douglas's mother had recently died too, mind) but he lost to Holyfield because he had neglected his skill and was attempting to throw single power punches. It worked against lesser opponents who were afraid of him but was insufficient against someone with Holyfield's skill.

[Jdasilva2012]

You need attention right?

[Silence]

Canelo also appreciates Tyson's strength. Since you mentioned "many of ATGs' style," could you list them? Tyson is a far superior fighter than Canelo. Canelo is nothing without the tainted beef and PEDS.

Fuck off. Won't waste more time with you.

[eco1]

I won't even comment on this anymore cause we have Canelo Nuthuggers and people who have followed the sport for a long time and know canelo is a scam.

So, without any bias whatsoever I leave this thread.

[War Room]

This is emotional fanboy apologetics. People always have stuff going on, they're just not all as self-pitying and emotionally incontinent as Tyson is. I'll just about accept it as an excuse for the Douglas loss (Douglas's mother had recently died too, mind) but he lost to Holyfield because he had neglected his skill and was attempting to throw single power punches. It worked against lesser opponents who were afraid of him but was insufficient against someone with Holyfield's skill.

Not really. Most people aren't being accused of **** in a global case or doing 3 years in jail over it during their primes, so like yea =---> no not really. How you think that's emotional makes zero sense.

Douglass was knocked out and got the long count.

We're not talking a second, we're talking ~5 seconds extra. Look at the white gloved hand ringside showing the real count and it matches my count up until the first 5 seconds.

Proof!




And that's with an out of shape Tyson.

[dan-b]

Not really. Most people aren't being accused of **** in a global case or doing 3 years in jail over it during their primes, so like yea =---> no not really. How you think that's emotional makes zero sense.

Douglass was knocked out and got the long count.

We're not talking a second, we're talking ~5 seconds extra. Look at the white gloved hand ringside showing the real count and it matches my count up until the first 5 seconds.

Proof!



And that's with an out of shape Tyson.

It's a ten count, not a ten second count so your 'proof' is redundant. You're attempting to cover both bases by saying he lost because of his personal life but didn't actually lose anyway because of a 'long count'. I actually thought you would have something more substantive to say but it's just the standard apologetics I've read on forums for years which is I tend not to participate (hence low post count).