Tweet
Yes you are sorry because you have ZERO understanding of the definition of Racist compared to institutional and historical Racism which was NEVER a part of this discussion and way off the tangent and thus the whole point flew right over your head! I used the term Racist, with no reference at all whatsoever to institutional Racism of the pastwhich you off the wall threw out of nowhere with no bearing here! A person can be a Racist without having to be part of the historical/institutional term of Racism; the terms are not umbilically synonymous!
Racist definition:
adjective: prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group. Remind you of someone? That is EXACTLY what 24HourBum or whatever his real name is as his non-stop ridicule and hate towards specific groups makes it even more than blatantly obvious.None of this is not up for debate so you can now consider yourself educated on this very distinct definition. I've worked in school systems where there has been racist comments and racial bias and the understanding of those is quite clear and students are counseled on these all the time which has absolutely nothing to do with institutional racism.
Guys like Imu the former talk show host and Broner the boxer and 24HourBum have shown loud and clear racial bias to the point of despise and hate and are categorically defined as racists. Get it? Got it? GOOD! Next time I charge you for this. Cash or Paypal only. This time was free.
And furthermore, the definition of Racism itself is not umbilically synonymous with institutional Racism which had nothing to do with this post, which was something you threw out from left field. Racism is a faction of its own that has its own definition:
Racism:
noun: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group.
You are dismissed.
Well at least you’re knowledgable about stuff like institutional racism. Sorry to be patronizing, but that surprises me because most people are not, and my expectations are so low from talking to be people round here, so I salute you.
OTOH, black-on-white racism doesn’t exist, and that Google definition is a well-known fraud, with definition 2 contradicting the 1st one, because Interpersonal racism can only present where bigotry along racialised lines correlates with existing, or historical power dynamics. As you know, there is no precedent, anywhere, for white social groups enduring structural discrimination under the governance of black institutional power (so far, ofc) and it is, thus, laughable that any prejudice operating in this manner can be described as racism, though it may indeed be ‘racial bias’. E.g. a school child who is non-white expressing racialised hostility to a white school child within a white educational structure, itself existing under white governance is absolutely not racism.
This is like when hetero men complain that there’s no straight pride, or that they’re victims of “reverse sexism” from women. Just “no”.
Comment