At best for ggg, canelo will beat ggg by UD. I actually see canelo stopping or KO'ing him this time. ggg is not beating canelo.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GGG Has Less Than 10% Chance of Beating Canelo
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Dakuwaqa View Post
Average fan scorecard that happens to be your scorecard
I look for meaningful punches landed. Power punches.
Both fighters outlanded the other in 6 rounds a piece.
Nobody actually won. Scores of 6-6 were accurate. The hate for Canelo is at another level though. So it was a “robbery”.
Comment
-
That’s generous, I give him less than a 1% chance of winning.
He was better the first two fights, he’s older now and declined now.
And we already know no matter what happens he’s never going to get a decision, and canelo has an iron chin, zero chance of knocking him out.
Theres literally no way of winning unless canelo breaks both his arms during the fight.MikeyMike100 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
I was speaking about the ringside scorers. I should’ve been more specific.
If you had Canelo winning 4 rounds against Bivol than your card is suspect at best and corrupt at worst. What 4 rounds could Canelo have possibly won?
No one credible had Floyd 10-2 over Castillo.
If that’s the case, once corrupt, always corrupt. None of the judges for that fight could be trusted and all of their scorecards should be retroactively put in question.
Tim Cheatum had Canelo winning 5 rounds over Bivol.
Then we need to look at his scorecard of:
Charlo vs Castaño 114-114
Rigondeaux vs Casimero - 113-115 for Rigo
Gave Canelo the least amount of rounds of all 3 judges vs BJS. In a scorecard more aligned with fan scorecards.
Gave more rounds to Spence than the other 2 judges vs DSG. More aligned with fan scorecards.
Had Lomachenko vs Lopez the closest out of all 3 judges. More aligned with fan scorecards.
Accurately scored Charlo-Derevyanchenk 116-112, the only judge to score it closely to fan scorecards.
And so on.
Don’t even get me started on the other two well known corrupted judges, Dave Moretti and Steve Weisfeld. All 3 had it 115-113 for Bivol. You know they were paid off.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
My scorecard wasn’t 8-4 GGG. I don’t glorify jabs, ever.
I look for meaningful punches landed. Power punches.
Both fighters outlanded the other in 6 rounds a piece.
Nobody actually won. Scores of 6-6 were accurate. The hate for Canelo is at another level though. So it was a “robbery”.
80%+ people thought ggg won both fights.
Stfu
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
You can’t just pick and choose when a judge is “corrupt” or “suspect”.
If that’s the case, once corrupt, always corrupt. None of the judges for that fight could be trusted and all of their scorecards should be retroactively put in question.
Tim Cheatum had Canelo winning 5 rounds over Bivol.
Then we need to look at his scorecard of:
Charlo vs Castaño 114-114
Rigondeaux vs Casimero - 113-115 for Rigo
Gave Canelo the least amount of rounds of all 3 judges vs BJS. In a scorecard more aligned with fan scorecards.
Gave more rounds to Spence than the other 2 judges vs DSG. More aligned with fan scorecards.
Had Lomachenko vs Lopez the closest out of all 3 judges. More aligned with fan scorecards.
Accurately scored Charlo-Derevyanchenk 116-112, the only judge to score it closely to fan scorecards.
And so on.
Don’t even get me started on the other two well known corrupted judges, Dave Moretti and Steve Weisfeld. All 3 had it 115-113 for Bivol. You know they were paid off.
What kind of ****** ass bs is this?
Canelo fights are always corrupt in his favor even when he loses. U dunceboxingfan91 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by War Room View Post
The thing that's interesting here is most people pick the wrong winner in the pickem thing. With that said, all these people being parakeets for GGG losing is really making me think GGG might actually get the win here. Too many denegerate losers regularly picking losers, someone has to put a fade in.
The way I see it is that Canelo stands a good shot at being mentally broken. It's one thing for a fighter to lose a fight that he feels was close or that he could have won, but it is something else entirely when you get such a beatdown like Canelo got from Bivol, when Canleo was talking all kinds of ****, such as fighting Beterbiev or even Usyk. What a rude awakening from fantasy land that was! Canelo knows in his soul that Bivol spanked him, and sometimes that can wreck a man completely, especially men that feel as if they were unbeatable, men who had delusions of grandeur. And as an example, I can immediately point a finger at Deontay Wilder, a man who thought he was chosen by God to put his fellow heavyweights into bodybags, a man who thought that a whale saved him from drowning in the Mississippi River by using its tale to lift him to safety. You heard the craziest religious fantasies come out of that man's mouth, and because some of these guys are so divorced from reality, when it comes crashing down on them, they become half the man they used to be. I think that's very possible with Canelo. I think that his confidence is shook, and I think that Golovkin knows this and is going to press the point in the ring. With Jonathan Banks, Golovkin throws more punches now, and with more punches comes more opportunities to hurt Canelo. So if Canelo's confidence is shook, he'll be more defensive than usual, and if he's more defensive, then Golovkin will be more offensive. And ... well, I think we could get the first Canelo KO. I really do.
I'll leave it at that ... it's obviously impossible to predict a fight without knowing exactly how the camps for both guys have gone, who they've sparred, how that went, what injuries have occurred, and things like that. But calling a Golovkin KO this September is not really going that far out on a limb, IMO. Not far at all ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lance98 View PostI actually see canelo stopping or KO'ing him this time.
Comment
Comment