Comments Thread For: Kambosos: I Give Haney His Full Respect, Let Him Have His Time And We'll Do It Again

[rrayvez]

Not only am I bothered by the rematch, I don't like Haney having to do the rematch in Australia again! That was a HORRIBLE deal for Haney!

terrible deal!

[Rodtang]

Not only am I bothered by the rematch, I don't like Haney having to do the rematch in Australia again! That was a HORRIBLE deal for Haney!

And for B side rates

[Rodtang]

135 full of sharks? Name them. Tank is the only heavy hitter that can box, and it goes downhill from there. Maxie Hugh's has style, but he's under gunned. Ryan has a Canon, but mentally weak and boxing poor. Loma is busy. Who else is there?

The two best fights are Loma, who can come back anytime he wants, and Stevenson if he steps up, which is being hinted at.

[Sosay]

yeah i’ll pass, I’m good on watching haney jab for another 12 rounds

You mean, you don't want to see Haney fight someone who cannot force him to get out of 2nd gear. Don't blame Haney for Kambosos failing to do anything and lose to a jab only.

[eco1]

The rematch will happen. Kambosos wants another payday and Haney wants another win to Kambosos.

Ryan Garcia, Davis and Loma are much more dangerous fights.

135 is a war zone, nobody is safe here, everybody wants to enjoy his moments of glory. There are sharks in the water...

Who will be the last man stand at 135?

Loma will be, if he comes back from hearing bombs exploding all day, the same way he left a few months ago

[Rodtang]

Poor kid, I almost feel sorry.

He had to fight in Australia for the money that is not even bad, what a disgrace.

Fighting in Australia for lesser money is not the issue. In fact Haney has openly admitted he was the B side. The rematch isnt even the issue. The issue is, that the rematch has to be in Australia again, and now even as champion, he has to take the B side cut. Do you think that's fair? Also think about the fact it was a one sided rematch clause. So Haney who was the WBC champion wasn't allowed to have a rematch clause if he lost his title. Do you think that's fair? It's just as well Haney new he was gonna win, and didn't need a rematch, isn't it. It's a disgraceful deal.

[Rodtang]

Loma will be, if he comes back from hearing bombs exploding all day, the same way he left a few months ago

Loma can leave, anytime he chooses to. It's his choice to stay.

[Corelone]

I said sharks. Loma was always a small lightweight and now he's fighting for Ukrain. Stevenson is a Jr lightweight, with a similar style as Haney. Both of them would be underdogs vs Haney.

[Alan Smithee]

And this is the problem with rematch clauses. Guys get beat convincingly and are able to get right back in line immediately without earning it. There are better fights for Haney than a rematch with kambosos just like there are more significant options for Usyk and bivol than rematching Joshua and Canelo respectively.

Unfortunately it's the price of doing business in this sport. I really believe they are meant for disputed decisions or injury related losses. One sided fights should not warrant immediate rematches. What exactly will Kambo do differently in the rematch? I would like to hear his take!

[Rodtang]

It's not about letting have anything George. He's taken that from you. It's you who needs the time son.