Katie Taylor vs. Amanda Serrano : How many rounds did you give Katie Taylor with her sorry-ass punching technique?

[billeau2]

These ignorant-inexperienced and dishonest judges robbed my boy billeau2. I was trained in Aikido as a young-boy but I got my ass kicked because it sucks, I should of boxed in that fight -- which was the first martial-art that I ever learned, but NOOO, I wanted to look cool.

But later when I was a teen my elder brother introduced me to his boss who worked security, he was a master Kickboxer and coached on the weekends. He took me to a tournament in Venice Beach, I thought it was pretty cool and wished that I could become the next 'Bloodsport' , but I never had enough training to compete at the high-level.

But anyways back to Katie Taylor vs. Amanda Serrano.



I cant make this stuff up, look at how Katie pulls the first left-hook in this gif, its as if she has mastered the ability to create an illusion that her punch lands!

Katie's deceiving method of winning decision's, should be called 'Forgery' : I noticed that, her evasive-tactics combined with rapid ineffective-offense creates the illusion of effective-effort. Like you noted, eyes are meant to be tricked ; and I guess that is a art-form in itself.

Katie Taylor should be renamed 'Lady-Houdini' for all the times she escapes and vanishes with her belts.

Many people wind up training in great martial arts because of experience in a martial art that was lacking. Aikido, the way it is trained in the Western World and most of the Japanese world is crap. There are notable exceptions... and it works great for bouncing (Sankyo!)...

Yeah Katie gets away with murder! lol.

[PotentialToast]

I don't watch female and I thought Laila Ali was the best inboxing. But I have heard Katie is creme de la creme so I will try watch it. To be frank I only saw 5th round.

Your a liar

[NC Uppercut]

This is Katie Taylor's work from round 2, as you can see this is crap : Taylor hits Amanda on the crown of her head, back of the head, neck, or barely makes any contact ; a lot of Katies shots were blocked. To be fair to Taylor, she lands the best punch of the round @ 1.10 but the majority of her punches are not clean and sloppy.

In real time, these grazing shots with the input of commentators that make mistakes calling the scraping blows hard strikes, convinces the untrained eye.

Compare this to Amanda's consistent steady clean-work, you cant give Taylor round 2.

I got the Amanda winning rounds : 2,4-5-6-10, round 5 is a 10-8. I have not studied rounds 3 in detail but you can also give Amanda a couple swing rounds.

Stop telling me that Katie Taylor beat Amanda Serrano, your a dumbass and should be embarrassed for your low-level of boxing knowledge.

Now get the F-OUT of my thread!

Taylor had 3 of the ten on my card. That was a first card watch too. I can’t go back and rewatch without being a bit biased at this point. Honesty man