Comments Thread For: Haney Agrees To Fight Kambosos On June 5th In Melbourne As Part Of Multi-Fight Deal

[Earl-Hickey]

If the fight happens to be close and competitive, they might give it to kambosos, so haney better put on a dominating performance all 12 rounds or KO kambosos, or they are going to rob him. Australia is not exactly the best place when it comes to boxing scoring and judging. I do think haney is better than kambosos, but you have to factor in the location.

Kambosos starts 3 rounds up in fight 1

If Haney wins and there is fight 2, kambosos starts 6 rounds up.

Australia will NOT give up their unified champion unless a robbery would be the worst in the history of sport. Haney HAS to ko him.

[Rustyman]

Lol, besides the fact these are occasional incidences for everyone else and not an aggressive world view like with the PBC. This is Lou Dibella’s deal too, he explored the DAZN deal, but it wasn’t as good as ESPN’s, so he took ESPN, thus Arum’s involvement as ESPN’s boxing promoter. Whoever fights Kambo as unified/indisputed champ will have to rematch him. You don’t really believe they should have co-promoted this do you? Where should the fight have taken place then genius.

PBC kept their entire 147lb roster away from Crawford and refused to host him when it was offered, you tard.

So, as expected, when the narrative doesn't match what the Top Rank fanboys want, they resort to insults.

Why would Kambosos deserve a rematch? Josh Taylor did not give a rematch to his opponent when he became undisputed, Charlo/Castano did not have a rematch schedule for their fight and only rematched when they had a draw? Loma did not get a rematch when Teo defeated him? What makes Kambosos so special that he has to get a rematch?

If people would simply admit they are simple fanboys I would not have a problem but trying to rationalise idiocy, you are exactly what you resort to calling others. A mentally deficient cretin with the language skills of a pre-schooler.

Also, make up your mind. If you want to claim Kambosos as "indisputed", do so, don't hedge your bets as it simply allows the rest of us to laugh at you even more.

[SplitSecond]

So, as expected, when the narrative doesn't match what the Top Rank fanboys want, they resort to insults.

Why would Kambosos deserve a rematch? Josh Taylor did not give a rematch to his opponent when he became undisputed, Charlo/Castano did not have a rematch schedule for their fight and only rematched when they had a draw? Loma did not get a rematch when Teo defeated him? What makes Kambosos so special that he has to get a rematch?

If people would simply admit they are simple fanboys I would not have a problem but trying to rationalise idiocy, you are exactly what you resort to calling others. A mentally deficient cretin with the language skills of a pre-schooler.

Also, make up your mind. If you want to claim Kambosos as "indisputed", do so, don't hedge your bets as it simply allows the rest of us to laugh at you even more.

A whole lot of nothing of a post, stick to the points, is this you just thinking out loud? I’m still wondering how Haney taking this deal is worse than PBC ruining Crawford’s career and still wondering what the alternative deal should’ve been.

Kambosos has a rematch clause because that’s his right as the guy holding all the titles and bringing the noise in Australia, derp. Lomachenko could’ve had one too. What are you so sht scared of a rematch for?

[The Big Dunn]

A whole lot of nothing of a post, stick to the points, is this you just thinking out loud? I’m still wondering how Haney taking this deal is worse than PBC ruining Crawford’s career and still wondering what the alternative deal should’ve been.

Kambosos has a rematch clause because that’s his right as the guy holding all the titles and bringing the noise in Australia, derp. Lomachenko could’ve had one too. What are you so sht scared of a rematch for?

PBC didn’t ruin Crawford’s career. Crawford did by re-signing with TR when he was a free agent.

We all get you’re a diehard Pac fan who hates the fact he lost to Floyd and then Ugas on PBC. But to blame anyone other than Crawford for that is idiotic.

You also would never condone a rematch like this if it was done by a pbc boxer.We get it- you hate pbc and want their boxers to lose every time.

[The Big Dunn]

Kudos to Haney. This deal looks terrible from the outside but this is what he had to do if he wanted a shot.

He ****** it up, signed it, and now he has a chance to elevate his career.

Obviously not the same financial scale, but this reminds me of Floyd taking the odh fight.

When you’re a low reward, high risk fighter looking to make the leap , you gotta man up and take crap deals to get the big names in the ring.

The other great thing is Haney doing this exposes a ton of posters on NSB. Haney should be celebrated and applauded for this- especially as much as the other top LW’s avoided him- rather than criticized.

I hope Haney pulls the upset so Loma, Tank and Ryan can’t avoid him anymore.

[nino brown21]

Nope, just calling it as it is, and that's a garbage deal. He took it because he wants to be great and win an undisputed title, still doesn't mean it's a great deal. Short money, having to fight in his opponent's backyard even if he wins and is the undisputed champ, then he already has his second defense mapped out for him. No fan fiction, just the truth, he gave up a lot to make 1 fight for undisputed happen.

Devin's about it , he may be getting a crap deal but he's going for it . other fighters need to take notes . I like haney and if he makes it outta this deal 3-0 then that'll be more than impressive.

[ralex]

Don’t see how you can do anything but give Haney props for taking such a **** deal.

Finally someone willing to take a huge risk for a huge reward.


take notes Andrade Charlo Benavidez……..

[Idunnoshet]

You seriously can’t see what was racist about that comment? Really? Really?

I don't.
I don't see a racist around every corner or every post.

I know in today's times most people are ultra sensitive but IMO there's nothing racist about a poster saying Kambosos will upset blacks. Haney is black. I'm sure a proportionate amount of his fans are too.
Or is it racist to say black ?

I wouldn't get Offended if someone commented that " Bivol was gonna upset Mexicans".

Because guess what.
Canelo is Mexican and I'm sure a proportionate amount of his fans are as well.

* Funny how you have the #1 race baiter on NSB OldskoolBiatch liking your post.

[Amir Imam]

Wait, he's a victim? Because he gets to fight the champ, even though he hasn't earned it? No offense, but that seems like an upside down way to interpret it.

He gets to fight the champ. He should be glad for it. Now he has a chance to prove people wrong who say he's too scared to fight, is pillow fisted, hugs like a hippie, or whatever.

If he wins, maybe they're haters. If he loses, maybe they're right, depending on how he loses.

Nobody is a victim who makes mills. Facts.

Who said anything about being a victim? Nothing you wrote is relevant to what I said. He could’ve proved all those things without having to sign a bad contract. My comment has ZERO to do with wins or losses.

[Amir Imam]

3 fight deal. Kambosos, rematch then Loma. That's 18 months if he chooses to fight 2 times a year and they're good fights.

Like I said let’s see if he gets through this deal without any grievances. What you wrote sounds good but you’re not the president of Top Rank. If Haney loses the first fight he’s screwed and that’s just my opinion.