Mayweather Sr. Accuses Pacquiao of Steroid Use

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boojee
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 1577
    • 55
    • 73
    • 7,738

    #321
    Originally posted by Al Haymon
    Well, you are talking abot "proof" and him making "an accusation". I watched the video. What were his first few words?

    You haven't demonstrated that you understand the difference between an opinion and an accusation.
    although writing in my 2nd language, i know the difference in definition, i'm a college grad. lol good job with the diversion tactics and sugar coating Floyd Sr.s ****.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #322
      Originally posted by boojee
      dude, imo it's because Sr. has no proof, and he is a former lying drug dealer and a convict and people had to put into consideration that his accusations are driven by jealousy and insecurities towards Roach and Pac because they made him look like a fool in the hatton fight, he was fired by Oscar for Roach etc, etc, etc...

      (esl)
      How do you know this?

      Comment

      • boojee
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2006
        • 1577
        • 55
        • 73
        • 7,738

        #323
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        How do you know this?
        lmao! is Al Haymon your alt?

        Comment

        • Al Haymon
          Banned
          • Sep 2009
          • 4214
          • 159
          • 97
          • 4,818

          #324
          Originally posted by boojee
          although writing in my 2nd language, i know the difference in definition, i'm a college grad. lol good job with the diversion tactics and sugar coating Floyd Sr.s ****.
          There is no diversion. It is the fundamental issue.

          If a man expresses AN OPINION - which people in America have a right to do - then you can't require "proof" on that opinion. That is why it is "an opinion" to begin with.

          You are terming it (like the TS) an accusation, when the video clearly showed that it is an opinion.

          If it was AN ACCUSATION, then it would be defamatory, and slanderous. And I would be behind you 100% percent.

          Huge difference. That is a VERY important distinction, and I'm sh****ed and disappointed that you, as a college grad, don't understand it.


          And if you DID understand it, why did you ask for "proof"?

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #325
            Originally posted by boojee
            lmao! is Al Haymon your alt?
            Is that your answer?

            Comment

            • boojee
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2006
              • 1577
              • 55
              • 73
              • 7,738

              #326
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              Is that your answer?
              no that was my question to you.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #327
                Originally posted by boojee
                no that was my question to you.
                No, he is not. And your answer?

                Comment

                • Al Haymon
                  Banned
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 4214
                  • 159
                  • 97
                  • 4,818

                  #328
                  Originally posted by Fights

                  Several observations on this interview:

                  1) He said "MY HONEST OPINION, I believe he is....". Not only once does he invalidate "an accusation", but twice. Before the word steroids is ever mentioned.

                  2) The fact that we did not hear the question that was asked leaves the context in doubt. Obviously from the use of the pronoun rather than the proper noun, both participants knew who FMS was referring to. Ergo, a question had been asked.

                  I wish I could have heard the question.

                  Comment

                  • IMDAZED
                    Fair but Firm
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 42644
                    • 1,134
                    • 1,770
                    • 67,152

                    #329
                    Originally posted by Al Haymon
                    Several observations on this interview:

                    1) He said "MY HONEST OPINION, I believe he is....". Not only once does he invalidate "an accusation", but twice. Before the word steroids is ever mentioned.

                    2) The fact that we did not hear the question that was asked leaves the context in doubt. Obviously from the use of the pronoun rather than the proper noun, both participants knew who FMS was referring to. Ergo, a question had been asked.

                    I wish I could have heard the question.
                    The question is always more important than the answer. It's amazing how many newslines you read with a fighter being taken completely out of context.

                    Comment

                    • boojee
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 1577
                      • 55
                      • 73
                      • 7,738

                      #330
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED
                      No, he is not. And your answer?
                      to what?..................

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP