Mayweather Sr. Accuses Pacquiao of Steroid Use
Collapse
-
How do you know this?dude, imo it's because Sr. has no proof, and he is a former lying drug dealer and a convict and people had to put into consideration that his accusations are driven by jealousy and insecurities towards Roach and Pac because they made him look like a fool in the hatton fight, he was fired by Oscar for Roach etc, etc, etc...
(esl)Comment
-
There is no diversion. It is the fundamental issue.
If a man expresses AN OPINION - which people in America have a right to do - then you can't require "proof" on that opinion. That is why it is "an opinion" to begin with.
You are terming it (like the TS) an accusation, when the video clearly showed that it is an opinion.
If it was AN ACCUSATION, then it would be defamatory, and slanderous. And I would be behind you 100% percent.
Huge difference. That is a VERY important distinction, and I'm sh****ed and disappointed that you, as a college grad, don't understand it.
And if you DID understand it, why did you ask for "proof"?Comment
-
Several observations on this interview:
1) He said "MY HONEST OPINION, I believe he is....". Not only once does he invalidate "an accusation", but twice. Before the word steroids is ever mentioned.
2) The fact that we did not hear the question that was asked leaves the context in doubt. Obviously from the use of the pronoun rather than the proper noun, both participants knew who FMS was referring to. Ergo, a question had been asked.
I wish I could have heard the question.Comment
-
The question is always more important than the answer. It's amazing how many newslines you read with a fighter being taken completely out of context.Several observations on this interview:
1) He said "MY HONEST OPINION, I believe he is....". Not only once does he invalidate "an accusation", but twice. Before the word steroids is ever mentioned.
2) The fact that we did not hear the question that was asked leaves the context in doubt. Obviously from the use of the pronoun rather than the proper noun, both participants knew who FMS was referring to. Ergo, a question had been asked.
I wish I could have heard the question.Comment
Comment