technically Wilder is 1-2 against Fury

[Dominicankingofboxing]

Fury should have won all three times he ***ed up wilder in the last two fights he's a skilled boxer with a nice sting

[Slicc]

Whether or not you feel Reiss shouldn't have given Fury a count is just your opinion. It wasn't against the rules and Fury got up in time.

[buge]

Since Fury got up and was fine, it's obvious that giving him the count was the right call.

I think there should always be a count. The 10 seconds isn't going to kill someone, and they are given that amount of time by the rules.

[REDEEMER]

technically he should of got the first victory. there should of never been a count for Fury. there was no count for Szpilka

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg2uQ1uoBJU&t=50s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xR6zKR0bTQ

fury still won the trilogy and prevailed, but Wilder did win the first fight... 1-2 overall

Szpilka was carried out on a stretcher,wheather it was his decision or not he was not getting up and Chisora knocked him out just as bad . Fury actually out boxed Wilder after that it’s clear the right decision was made . Now if you make a thread about the cut Fury suffered in the Wallin fight that’s actually a reasonable argument why that should or could have been stopped .

[kafkod]

Whether or not you feel Reiss shouldn't have given Fury a count is just your opinion. It wasn't against the rules and Fury got up in time.

But Szpilka didn't get a count. So technically, Fury didn't have time to get up. He just got KTFO, same as Szpilka.

[sicko]

OK? Which still makes him the Loser of the Trilogy...

Respect to Wilder, I would love to see him continue to fight on and I do miss the guy honest (not so much his Fanboys) he is great for the Division and was one of the more exciting fighters in all of boxing regardless of his LACK OF Technical Boxing Skills. If he comes back it is still plenty of great fights to make, if not then again Respect to him he has nothing to be ashamed about he did well for himself and made himself a ton of money during that Fury Trilogy so he really doesn't have to fight again. Not bad for a man who was hoping to just be a Journeyman to provide for his daughter

[MONGOOSE66]

technically he should of got the first victory. there should of never been a count for Fury. there was no count for Szpilka

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg2uQ1uoBJU&t=50s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xR6zKR0bTQ

fury still won the trilogy and prevailed, but Wilder did win the first fight... 1-2 overall

Technically, people can have an opinion and technically it doesn’t really matter to most.

[sbbigmike]

More like 2-2 if we talking like 2 20 seconds counts the last fight...

They got a weird lil trilogy if wilder was to man up and keep fighting he could see he getting closer and closer to fury...fury mightve ended that boy career tho

[BodyBagz]

technically he should of got the first victory. there should of never been a count for Fury. there was no count for Szpilka

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg2uQ1uoBJU&t=50s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xR6zKR0bTQ

fury still won the trilogy and prevailed, but Wilder did win the first fight... 1-2 overall

Many times a boxer is given every opportunity to beat the count, unless the damage was piling up.
The ref walked over to him and Fury said something. That exchange most certainly gave the ref reason to let it go on.

Vs Spiz, the ref did start to count and figured out counting to 100 wouldn't be long enough.

[BodyBagz]

As a 99 % Fury hater (I'm rooting for him vs Whyte), Fury should be 3-0 (even in that dirty AF rematch)