Comments Thread For: Sorry, But Close Fight in Scotland Doesn't Register on Robbery Scale

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tatabanya
    Split Draw Addict
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 10706
    • 4,394
    • 2,085
    • 61,641

    #21
    Basically, one also has to get seriously battered when robbed. If you are merely pickpocketed, you're not registering as "robbed" on the Fitzsimmons scale.

    Comment

    • P to the J
      GAARR-bidge DAAY!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2018
      • 2734
      • 1,246
      • 2,381
      • 9,102

      #22
      Here's an idea Fitzsimmons: if the fight should be scored for Catterall, yet Taylor was awarded it, then its the proverbial 'robbery' no matter how 'close' it was.

      Comment

      • P to the J
        GAARR-bidge DAAY!
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2018
        • 2734
        • 1,246
        • 2,381
        • 9,102

        #23
        Originally posted by Tatabanya
        Basically, one also has to get seriously battered when robbed. If you are merely pickpocketed, you're not registering as "robbed" on the Fitzsimmons scale.
        Exactly, thank you

        Comment

        • GlassJoey
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2017
          • 2670
          • 322
          • 201
          • 37,020

          #24
          Andre Ward watched Jose Ramirez barely win a round against Postol and had him 6-0 up. His justification was that Ramirez had Postol right where he wanted him.

          Boxingscene love claiming robberies were close with articles like this.

          Comment

          • 786
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2011
            • 1165
            • 394
            • 976
            • 16,270

            #25
            The thing I've been saying since the fight is that Catteral seemed to coast from the 9th which gives judges/people an excuse to say "it was a close enough fight to not be a robbery" and this is what this article is. Taylor was competitive throughout but it wasn't a close fight, there was a clear winner and it wasn't Taylor.

            Comment

            • youbeight
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2015
              • 1667
              • 88
              • 1
              • 28,154

              #26
              Dude wrote an article going against the grain to get style points. Sad.

              Comment

              • hogey
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 455
                • 67
                • 61
                • 10,992

                #27
                Lyle Fitzsimmons must have the same optician as Ian John Lewis, if you could watch that fight and not see a clear win for the man who threw and landed double the punches than his opponent then you are an utter clown and not worth listening to.

                Comment

                • Boxing Beast
                  Disputed
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2021
                  • 445
                  • 255
                  • 490
                  • 0

                  #28
                  The thing that gets me is there is no excuse. I'd like to see a ten point must system with reasoned scoring. So after each round the judge would have to state why the thought whoever won the round won. Without input there is nothing to correct. Catteral won and should be one of the few undisputed champions in history. The consequences are worse than a robbery. Lyle is wrong.

                  Comment

                  • vinnieq
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Aug 2011
                    • 124
                    • 62
                    • 73
                    • 6,345

                    #29
                    I think the biggest takeaway from it is that Taylor didn't have a good strategy..
                    No matter how done he is at the weight, he looked like he hadn't a clue how to approach Catterall's style.
                    Catterall was completely side-on and Taylor just walked into his firing line repeatedly.
                    Ben Davidson seems good at the drills and technique. But even in the Fury fight, he seemed a bit timid in his strategy.

                    Comment

                    • byfbnz
                      Contender
                      • Apr 2019
                      • 194
                      • 28
                      • 77
                      • 5,264

                      #30
                      Taylor had a sloppy performance. Catterral had a crisp performance when not being mauled by Taylor. Sure it's not a robbery in Scotland because the fight was IN Scotland.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP