Was the Oscar that fought Floyd better than the Oscar who fought Pac man?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Equinox
    Undisputed Champion
    • Mar 2009
    • 1319
    • 118
    • 22
    • 7,528

    #21
    **** yea by a mile.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #22
      Goodness. I guess Steve Forbes fought the best Oscar of them all.

      Comment

      • 3doorsdown
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 105
        • 3
        • 4
        • 6,165

        #23
        Ricardo Mayorga got the last piece of a primed Oscar

        Comment

        • Al Haymon
          Banned
          • Sep 2009
          • 4214
          • 159
          • 97
          • 4,818

          #24
          Originally posted by AceNguyen
          He's not better at 140, he's the same fighter. The problem is, when fighting welterweights like Collazo and Floyd, his physical advantages go away. This doesn't mean that the Hatton that fought Floyd is worse H2H than the Hatton that fought Pacquiao.
          Thank you very much. You have restored my faith in humanity.

          In fact, it can be reasonably argued that RH is a better fighter at 147 because he hasn't had to strip down as much weight. Assuming, of course, that he is the same 152-154 on fight night.

          But his opponent at 147 ALSO gets "better".

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP