Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Report: Kambosos To Defend Lightweight Titles June 5 In Melbourne, Lomachenko Frontrunner

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
    So instead of a unification, it’ll be the entitled line skipping loma jumping to the front again to get a title shot just like he’s been doing since his 2nd pro fight. Some boxers get all the entitlement while others can’t get a shot yet constantly get told “but who have you beat” despite being avoided.
    Entitled? What entitlement is , is getting an email stating your Champ

    Comment


    • #22
      Fight of the year by far if Fury vs Usyk won't happen. I am rooting for Kambosos. Best Australian fighter ever.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Luilun View Post

        Entitled? What entitlement is , is getting an email stating your Champ
        you think he wanted to get his belt that way? He was mandatory and loma (being entitled) asked the wbc for the franchise title instead of facing him. So who’s fault is that? Loma is an example of maybe the most entitled move ever. He demanded a title shot in his first pro fight. When he was told he needed at least 1 pro fight first, He got a title shot in his 2nd pro fight , lost, and got another title shot in his 3rd pro fight. Doesn’t get more entitled than that.

        Comment


        • #24
          I have Lomachenko winning this but massive props to Kambosos for seeking the best. That is a real champion, win or lose.

          Originally posted by JonDelPrado View Post
          Is Kambosos assuming that because he beat Lopez he can beat Lomachenko? Not going to happen, easy work for the Ukrainian.
          Probably just wants to fight the best available fighter like a true champion. He could have fought a gimme fight or easier fight I am sure? Like Lemos or Romero?
          mrgreenfingers mrgreenfingers likes this.

          Comment


          • #25
            Haney frozen out fighting in another pitched black arena




            Comment


            • #26
              This dummy ducking Ryan.. that left hook would put that fool out to pasture!!

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                he also lost his fight right before those 2, he’s also the reason the titles weren’t unified because he asked for the franchise title instead. He didn’t fight Haney as a mandatory and now he’s cutting in front of him to unify. Loma is entitled, he is cutting the line ….again and while I don’t hate the match up, I’d prefer a unification with the younger fighters who are supposed to be the future. Not a guy who has had his time already.
                Haney and his boring style cant draw flies to shiiit…has alot to do with it. Unlike Davis - “entitled” Loma continues to fight undefeated champions.

                mrgreenfingers mrgreenfingers likes this.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                  you think he wanted to get his belt that way? He was mandatory and loma (being entitled) asked the wbc for the franchise title instead of facing him. So who’s fault is that? Loma is an example of maybe the most entitled move ever. He demanded a title shot in his first pro fight. When he was told he needed at least 1 pro fight first, He got a title shot in his 2nd pro fight , lost, and got another title shot in his 3rd pro fight. Doesn’t get more entitled than that.
                  Lol “entitled” - what other fighter asks for a title shot in his 1st or 2nd pro fight?? Zero! What other fighter makes history and wins titles in 3 different weight divisions in just 12 fights? Zero. Dont hate!

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                    he also lost his fight right before those 2, he’s also the reason the titles weren’t unified because he asked for the franchise title instead. He didn’t fight Haney as a mandatory and now he’s cutting in front of him to unify. Loma is entitled, he is cutting the line ….again and while I don’t hate the match up, I’d prefer a unification with the younger fighters who are supposed to be the future. Not a guy who has had his time already.
                    He lost a fight so what? 99.9% of all great fighters in history lost fights, he’s rebounded and beat two more top 10 contenders, what more do you want? That doesn’t make him entitled whatsoever, in fact it makes him deserving of a title shot.

                    For perspective, Haney has only ever beaten two top 10 contenders in his entire career. He’s less deserving than Loma in all honesty.

                    I’m fine with either matchup, both make sense but just stop with all the BS about cutting in line and entitlement, it’s pathetic dude. Haney’s team have seemingly dropped the ball during the negotiations and now Loma is stepping in to take his place. It’s just as good a fight, so stop crying about it.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      I think this will be fairly one-sided in Lomas favour.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP