Comments Thread For: Report: Kambosos To Defend Lightweight Titles June 5 In Melbourne, Lomachenko Frontrunner
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Do you live entirely in a fantasy world?
Fighters arent ranked based on quantifiable metrics - they're tossed in and out of the top ten arbitrability - just as much based on name value and popularity as who theyve beat. Promoters will literally ask for someone ranked 50th to be put in the top 15 so their champion can defend against him and the sanctioning body will be like "yeah no problem".
If a major promoter has an Olympic gold medalist, they can absolutely go to the sanctioning body and be like "We'd like to fight for the title in our first pro fight" and they would absolutely have the request granted. You are aware the WBCs bylaws literally say "We can add or remove anyone to any position for any reason at any time", right?
Comment
-
Just to be clear, George hasn't signed anything yet and Dibella will try to get the best for Kambosos. Arum actually needs the fight more than anyone else so he'll pay but the fact remains, it's not signed by Kambosos.
If the money and terms are right, it's very possible that Lou will switch gears and go with the best deal for his fighter....right up until the last second. It's not over until it's over.Comment
-
Comment
-
he got a title shot in his 2nd pro fight and I said that’s entitlement and it is. Not even sure what your dumb ass is arguing about anymore other than the fact that you’re an emotional loma nut hugger and want nothing but praise for him. He shouldn’t have gotten the shot then and he’s skipping the line now because he’s entitled. You’re literally arguing that he isn’t entitled yet can’t name anyone in 60 yrs who hs received the treatment he has. Ya fkn dunce.
Do you live entirely in a fantasy world?
Fighters arent ranked based on quantifiable metrics - they're tossed in and out of the top ten arbitrability - just as much based on name value and popularity as who theyve beat. Promoters will literally ask for someone ranked 50th to be put in the top 15 so their champion can defend against him and the sanctioning body will be like "yeah no problem".
If a major promoter has an Olympic gold medalist, they can absolutely go to the sanctioning body and be like "We'd like to fight for the title in our first pro fight" and they would absolutely have the request granted. You are aware the WBCs bylaws literally say "We can add or remove anyone to any position for any reason at any time", right?
Comment
-
There are zero metrics or outlines for how and when a fighter is to be placed in the top ten or into a mandatory position. No minimum pro fights, no minimum length of career.he got a title shot in his 2nd pro fight and I said that’s entitlement and it is. Not even sure what your dumb ass is arguing about anymore other than the fact that you’re an emotional loma nut hugger and want nothing but praise for him. He shouldn’t have gotten the shot then and he’s skipping the line now because he’s entitled. You’re literally arguing that he isn’t entitled yet can’t name anyone in 60 yrs who hs received the treatment he has. Ya fkn dunce.
None.
Zero.Comment
-
I ain’t been stalking you whatsoever, we’ve been having a discussion within one thread you f***ing victim.
You’re the fanboy here too, b****ing and crying cause Loma is getting the Kambosos fight. I said I was cool with Loma or Haney from the jump.
You’re the one getting all emotional and bizarrely claiming Loma “cut in line” despite him being a far more credible opponent than Haney to begin with.
Comment
-
and if you get a title shot in your second pro fight , you’re receiving entitled treatment because no one has revived that treatment in 60 yrs. So what exactly are you debating ?
Comment
-
nah you just have female emotions. I didn’t say anything haterish about loma. I didn’t say he wasn’t skilled or accomplished yet you went straight into the hater defense mode like a typical groupie b***h. I mentioned the FACT that he got a title shot in just his 2nd pro fight and again in his 3rd. I mentioned the FACT that he asked for the franchise title when Haney became mandatory which prevented Haney from earning a title, and instead being considered an email champ. I then mentioned the FACT that since then Loma lost his belts, we’re now in a position to get a unification and Loma is jumping in front to get another title shot. I then mentioned my opinion that I would prefer that a younger fighter who hasn’t had the chance to get a big fight land one ahead of loma who has already received entitled treatment. You got mad over my opinion/preference and over the word entitled. 1. I’m “entitled” to my opinion and don’t care if you disagree because you have a man crush. 2. If he received a title shot in just his 2nd pro fight and nobody has had that treatment in 60 yrs and then was given a franchise title that was designed for only 2 boxers ever in the sport, and allowed them to avoid mandatories, they are in fact entitled. So fk what you think or how it hurts your feelings. Stating facts to back my stance isn’t hating, regardless if it makes your mangina bleed in anger.
I ain’t been stalking you whatsoever, we’ve been having a discussion within one thread you f***ing victim.
You’re the fanboy here too, b****ing and crying cause Loma is getting the Kambosos fight. I said I was cool with Loma or Haney from the jump.
You’re the one getting all emotional and bizarrely claiming Loma “cut in line” despite him being a far more credible opponent than Haney to begin with.
Comment
Comment