Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Fury: Whyte Won The Euro Lottery, Has Done Nothing But Get Chinned By a 45-Year-Old!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Yes Whyte is that much of a nobody that Arum and Warren stumped up 40 million dollars to get the fight.

    Obviously if the purse bid was for Fury vs Helenius they would have bid the same amount, right ?

    Some simple folks on here.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
      Perhaps a unification of Fury vs Usyk would be the fight that should be happening now? That’s what most real boxing fans would prefer to see. Unfortunately Whyte and Aj who both have taken losses recently are getting in the way of 2 undefeated champions unifying.


      Yea because Wilder had nothing to do with fighting Fury blocking undisputed and Fury not offering him step aside money ?

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Szef View Post

        Who deserves the fight more than Whyte?
        First you said he’s the most deserving, then I told you that the fight to make would be Fury vs Usyk and you changed your tone and said, well other than Usyk and Aj, whyte is without a doubt the most deserving. I think that’s debatable. An argument can be made that Wallin who gave Fury a tough fight and didn’t back out of his fight with Whyte in cowardly fashion could be considered more deserving. An argument can be made that Ortiz who has only lost to Wilder is more deserving. None of their resumes are great and end of the day, Whyte is 1-1 in his last two with the win and loss coming to an ancient fossil that was supposed to be a cherry pick. That doesn’t sound like someone deserving of a world title shot.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Stuart Chandler View Post



          Yea because Wilder had nothing to do with fighting Fury blocking undisputed and Fury not offering him step aside money ?
          I wasn’t happy about that one either and posted about it on here as well. I felt like Wilder should’ve stepped aside or even better, the court shouldn’t have ruled in his favor. So what other grasp at straws attempts would you like to make?

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
            First you said he’s the most deserving, then I told you that the fight to make would be Fury vs Usyk and you changed your tone and said, well other than Usyk and Aj, whyte is without a doubt the most deserving. I think that’s debatable. An argument can be made that Wallin who gave Fury a tough fight and didn’t back out of his fight with Whyte in cowardly fashion could be considered more deserving. An argument can be made that Ortiz who has only lost to Wilder is more deserving. None of their resumes are great and end of the day, Whyte is 1-1 in his last two with the win and loss coming to an ancient fossil that was supposed to be a cherry pick. That doesn’t sound like someone deserving of a world title shot.


            This guy refuses to answer who deserves a shot over Whyte and mentions the great Wallin as possibly more deserving after his last performance one has to wonder is this guy doing crack .

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
              I wasn’t happy about that one either and posted about it on here as well. I felt like Wilder should’ve stepped aside or even better, the court shouldn’t have ruled in his favor. So what other grasp at straws attempts would you like to make?


              Yet didn’t stop you from placing blame where it started . You must be a Wilder fanboy .

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                First you said he’s the most deserving, then I told you that the fight to make would be Fury vs Usyk and you changed your tone and said, well other than Usyk and Aj, whyte is without a doubt the most deserving. I think that’s debatable. An argument can be made that Wallin who gave Fury a tough fight and didn’t back out of his fight with Whyte in cowardly fashion could be considered more deserving. An argument can be made that Ortiz who has only lost to Wilder is more deserving. None of their resumes are great and end of the day, Whyte is 1-1 in his last two with the win and loss coming to an ancient fossil that was supposed to be a cherry pick. That doesn’t sound like someone deserving of a world title shot.
                Usyk and AJ are out of the equation. I thought that was obvious to everyone.

                The only HW who deserves the fight is Whyte.

                Not only was he a mandatory for years, he also has the best resume at HW except Fury and Joshua.

                Yes, his resume is better than Wilder's. Prove me wrong.

                No. No argument can be made that Wallin or Ortiz are more deserving of the fight. Their both claim to fame are fights they lost. Other than that their resumes are piss poor.

                Whyte is the man. Accept it.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Stuart Chandler View Post



                  Yet didn’t stop you from placing blame where it started . You must be a Wilder fanboy .
                  Literally answered the question in the previous post and stated the blame was wilders for not stepping aside and the courts for ruling in his favor. Your reading comprehension is clearly limited. Definitely not a wilder fan boy. He skills are limited, don’t like the excuse making from the loss to fury, didn’t like the blame he put in Breland nor his lack of sportsmanship in either loss. See, you just keep grasping at straws and making lame assumptions and look ****** every time you. I’m not a fan boy of any fighter. I just want to see the best fights get made. You should learn to think that way instead of being a **** gobbling groupie.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Szef View Post

                    Usyk and AJ are out of the equation. I thought that was obvious to everyone.

                    The only HW who deserves the fight is Whyte.

                    Not only was he a mandatory for years, he also has the best resume at HW except Fury and Joshua.

                    Yes, his resume is better than Wilder's. Prove me wrong.

                    No. No argument can be made that Wallin or Ortiz are more deserving of the fight. Their both claim to fame are fights they lost. Other than that their resumes are piss poor.

                    Whyte is the man. Accept it.
                    and that was my original point. They’re out of the equation and the fault belongs to Aj and Whyte. What more is there for you to understand. I see you truly love Whyte but my original point stands. He really doesn’t deserve a fight, he shouldn’t be rewarded for being a coward and backing out of the Wallin fight nor should he get a world title fight when he was knocked cold by an old washed up significant underdog 2 fights ago. He had a title shot, sh** the bed, was in line for another shot, sh** the bed again, had a chance to make a meaningful fight, backed out like a chump. In the Uk you may condone rewarding this type of behavior but I’m more of the mindset of the best fights should be made in boxing.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Whyte was getting ignored by the WBC while on an 11 fight win streak, during Wilders reign I believe only Ortiz (the first time) and Fury had longer win streaks.

                      And none of them got told they had fight Ortiz first. Ortiz never got told to fight a certain guy either.

                      Whytes deserved his shot for a while now, don’t need to like him or rate him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP