Comments Thread For: Brook: Khan Hired a Trainer Who Called Him a Quitter, Was Slagging Him Off

[Boro]

Khan really is a quitter, always a pleasure seeing that invader get KOd.

He's Bolton born and bred how on earth is he an "invader" you idiot, he's just as British as the next guy...

[sallyField]

He's Bolton born and bred how on earth is he an "invader" you idiot, he's just as British as the next guy...

He is not British by blood only by his nationality.

[1Eriugenus]

If you are 'Finland's Finest' then Finland is in a very bad way. I blame the lack of sunlight & MoFos eating fermented fish.

[1Eriugenus]

'You can keep calling people that, but when its too late you will find out that the people you are defending will not be treating non-******s all too well once they have the numbers (SOURCE: literally every single place in the world that has islamic rule in history.'

The teachings of Aristotle were saved &, with some difficulty, reconciled with the beliefs of Abrahamic religions by Averroes, Avicenna & also by Moises Maimonides, a ***, under the Caliphate of Cordoba & Seville. It took a long time before the Christians caught up, primarily lead by Thomas Aquinas. Islamic rule, in the c10-14th was one of toleration, compared to Christian rule that was oftentimes barbaric & fundamentalist.

I totally appreciate you won't know this but you need to stop your mouth writing cheques that history won't clear.

[1Eriugenus]

SallyField 'He is not British by blood only by his nationality.'

What, in God's name, does that mean? I mean, when I was younger I contemplated emigrating both to the USA & Australia. Had I done so, presumably you would've said I could never be an American, only a native American could be, or an Australian, only a native Australian could be. What would I be? You aren't, presumably, saying that the white or black people who've lived in the USA for 500 years are simply visitors? Tourists?
What would 'British by blood' mean? That is the most ludicrous & moronic comment I've heard for a long time. Certainly since Eddie Hearn last opened his trap.

[Boxing-1013]

Culture is not a static concept. Cultures have always inflenced each other, blended and EVOLVED.

Maybe you should try it sometime.

99% of human history, people have lived with other people who are almost identical to them in terms of race, spirituality, upbringing, ethics, morals etc. Thinking that you can combine all different groups together and have no chaos or disorder is just really misguided.

[Boro]

He is not British by blood only by his nationality.

That's a rétarded thing to say, Carl Froch is polish is he an invader? or is it skin colour that determines who's an invader... GTFO with that logic.

[Walexhris]

'You can keep calling people that, but when its too late you will find out that the people you are defending will not be treating non-******s all too well once they have the numbers (SOURCE: literally every single place in the world that has islamic rule in history.'

The teachings of Aristotle were saved &, with some difficulty, reconciled with the beliefs of Abrahamic religions by Averroes, Avicenna & also by Moises Maimonides, a ***, under the Caliphate of Cordoba & Seville. It took a long time before the Christians caught up, primarily lead by Thomas Aquinas. Islamic rule, in the c10-14th was one of toleration, compared to Christian rule that was oftentimes barbaric & fundamentalist.

I totally appreciate you won't know this but you need to stop your mouth writing cheques that history won't clear.

Well....we judge Islam by the Quran & after reading the book, it doesn't give me a reason to believe it teaches tolerance.
I've been searching through history for a time when christian rule was barbaric @ a fundamental level, can't find it...pls help me out with an example
The worst by far, would have to be the Communist regimes, which have been responsible for more deaths than all religious groups, put together.....

[sallyField]

SallyField 'He is not British by blood only by his nationality.'

What, in God's name, does that mean? I mean, when I was younger I contemplated emigrating both to the USA & Australia. Had I done so, presumably you would've said I could never be an American, only a native American could be, or an Australian, only a native Australian could be. What would I be? You aren't, presumably, saying that the white or black people who've lived in the USA for 500 years are simply visitors? Tourists?
What would 'British by blood' mean? That is the most ludicrous & moronic comment I've heard for a long time. Certainly since Eddie Hearn last opened his trap.

the invaders dna test wont say british thats for sure. cheers mate Great win for John ryder!!!!

[Jack_sh*t]

99% of human history, people have lived with other people who are almost identical to them in terms of race, spirituality, upbringing, ethics, morals etc. Thinking that you can combine all different groups together and have no chaos or disorder is just really misguided.

Nah, that's a **** attitude. I grew up in a multicultural area and we pretty much got along fine unless some **** was trying to cause trouble. The world is different than it used to be. Better move with the times or end up like the dinosaurs.