Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury: Usyk Went Life and Death With Chisora, Then Beat a Bodybuilder!

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

WBC heavyweight champion Tyson Fury is planning to take down mandatory challenger Dillian Whyte - and then topple IBF, WBO, IBO, WBA champion Oleksandr Usyk. Fury is slated to defend his title against Whyte on April 23, likely at Wembley Stadium.
[Click Here To Read More]

[turnedup]

Just keep the teeth grinding to a minimum and stfu already. This dude has beaten this Schtick to death, revived it and beat it dead again.

[✔ (Low- )]

Absolutely correct Gypsy King
Fury is too big too mobile too good,Usyk should fight Fury..lose and make a decision. Retire or beat everyone else that is not Wilder or Fury at HW..

[1hourRun]

I dont remember Oleksandr Usyk needing the help of paid-off referees and judges to win important matches. Tyson must be Savanah Marshall in drag, their long for Oleksandr Usyk and Clarresa Shields exceptional boxing skills are apparent in their strong and ridiculous critique.

Both 'Gypsy-Bum' Tyson Phooey and Savanah Marshall get a boxing lesson, when they stop ducking the gold-medalist and unified champeens.

[thack]

If it wasn't for the ridiculous rematch clause Joshua would be out of the equation having been beaten hands down and we would be seeing the fight that matters Fury v Usyk . Usyk is an excellent boxer and a joy to watch but sticking to the facts is never going to do to Fury what he did to Joshua .Fury is a much bigger version of Usyk and that means only one winner.

[JayCho]

If it wasn't for the ridiculous rematch clause Joshua would be out of the equation having been beaten hands down and we would be seeing the fight that matters Fury v Usyk . Usyk is an excellent boxer and a joy to watch but sticking to the facts is never going to do to Fury what he did to Joshua .Fury is a much bigger version of Usyk and that means only one winner.

Yeah, these rematch clauses really slow things down
like when fury had to rematch wilder for the third fight hence we didn’t get to see the undisputed fight again

[Toffee]

Yeah, these rematch clauses really slow things down
like when fury had to rematch wilder for the third fight hence we didn’t get to see the undisputed fight again

Added to the fact that this rematch clause hasn't held up anything. Fury wanted a fight before Usyk. He's getting one. We'll see if he still has the same appetite later this year.

The Wilder/Fury stuff genuinely did hold up the division. For a long time.

But let's not let silly things likes facts get in the way of a pro-Fury anti-Joshua rant.

[Toffee]

If it wasn't for the ridiculous rematch clause Joshua would be out of the equation having been beaten hands down and we would be seeing the fight that matters Fury v Usyk . Usyk is an excellent boxer and a joy to watch but sticking to the facts is never going to do to Fury what he did to Joshua .Fury is a much bigger version of Usyk and that means only one winner.

I love these people who think every fight is a 100% guaranteed win for the favourite.

Bless them. Just found boxing and want to offer the opinion they just read.

[petero]

I dont remember Oleksandr Usyk needing the help of paid-off referees and judges to win important matches. Tyson must be Savanah Marshall in drag, their long for Oleksandr Usyk and Clarresa Shields exceptional boxing skills are apparent in their strong and ridiculous critique.

Both 'Gypsy-Bum' Tyson Phooey and Savanah Marshall get a boxing lesson, when they stop ducking the gold-medalist and unified champeens.

Just bet the opposite of Elie's picks and you will win easy money every time. Complete Muppet Bum

[Akutalee]

Lmao says who cherry pick Wallin and the ref rob the poor boy of victory