Comments Thread For: Hearn: Joshua Pumped For Rematch, Says He Will Beat Usyk Without a Trainer

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShoulderRoll
    Join The Great Resist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 56158
    • 10,132
    • 5,032
    • 763,445

    #71
    Originally posted by Boxing Scene

    Yeah ok. Get trained by a ****ty boxer who loses. That worked great for Wilder.
    Tim was a two time world champion.

    He has an old school toolbox that can add to what McCracken brings to the table.

    Comment

    • PRINCEKOOL
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2016
      • 9796
      • 1,838
      • 1
      • 88,155

      #72
      Originally posted by Shadoww702

      1st off Whyte aint beating Fury.

      2nd god DAMN you make up a TON of EXCUSES for why AJ lost both times.

      Do you fantasize about AJ??? Is he your man crush??? Tell us all what you would do to him if you both were alone in bed...
      Anthony Joshua was prepared for Andy Ruiz Junior I, and his loss to Ruiz Junior was more devastating than the Usyk loss.

      Joshua is always prepared, but maybe Redeemer means? He was not specifically prepared for Ruiz Junior. But sometimes in boxing, fighters have to deal with those situations 'Lennox Lewis did it vs Vitali Kiltschko, and he was not prepared in terms of conditioning on top of not being specifically prepared for Kiltschko's style'.

      Preparing for the Andy Ruiz Junior rematch, was more of a daunting task for Joshua than this Usyk Rematch. Joshua can analyse his fight with Usyk, and still retrieve positive's from the performance. Usyk was hit, Usyk was busted up and Joshua did take Usyk's power and survive the 12 rounds.

      Compare that to what happened to him, against Andy Ruiz Junior who? Obliterated him every-time, Joshua tried to engage in warfare.

      I do think Redeemer slightly overrates Joshua's abilities, I mean Joshua for a super-heavyweight is not elite from a distance. His jab is way below par, Fury, Wilder and even Whyte all have better Jab's than Anthony Joshua.

      If Joshua had a solid jab, could fight on the inside and-use rough house tactics. Usyk would have zero answers to that kind of fight. Because Usyk himself cannot fight on the inside, and relies on doing damage from distance or mid-range.

      The reason why Joshua lost to Usyk was because, he has been neglecting his mid-range offensive assaults since Andy Ruiz I. If Joshua brings back this dimension to his game, and improves his jab 'I don't think Uysk will have answer'.

      We have already seen a version of Joshua who can beat Usyk, this fight does not require Joshua to reinvent himself.



      Comment

      • Shadoww702
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2015
        • 41176
        • 4,546
        • 2,938
        • 250,035

        #73
        Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL

        Anthony Joshua was prepared for Andy Ruiz Junior I, and his loss to Ruiz Junior was more devastating than the Usyk loss.

        Joshua is always prepared, but maybe Redeemer means? He was not specifically prepared for Ruiz Junior. But sometimes in boxing, fighters have to deal with those situations 'Lennox Lewis did it vs Vitali Kiltschko, and he was not prepared in terms of conditioning on top of not being specifically prepared for Kiltschko's style'.

        Preparing for the Andy Ruiz Junior rematch, was more of a daunting task for Joshua than this Usyk Rematch. Joshua can analyse his fight with Usyk, and still retrieve positive's from the performance. Usyk was hit, Usyk was busted up and Joshua did take Usyk's power and survive the 12 rounds.

        Compare that to what happened to him, against Andy Ruiz Junior who? Obliterated him every-time, Joshua tried to engage in warfare.

        I do think Redeemer slightly overrates Joshua's abilities, I mean Joshua for a super-heavyweight is not elite from a distance. His jab is way below par, Fury, Wilder and even Whyte all have better Jab's than Anthony Joshua.

        If Joshua had a solid jab, could fight on the inside and-use rough house tactics. Usyk would have zero answers to that kind of fight. Because Usyk himself cannot fight on the inside, and relies on doing damage from distance or mid-range.

        The reason why Joshua lost to Usyk was because, he has been neglecting his mid-range offensive assaults since Andy Ruiz I. If Joshua brings back this dimension to his game, and improves his jab 'I don't think Uysk will have answer'.

        We have already seen a version of Joshua who can beat Usyk, this fight does not require Joshua to reinvent himself.


        I 100% agree. He also needs to use his size way better.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP