Is it just me or is Katie Taylor terrible?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pretty boy_
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2015
    • 1196
    • 586
    • 104
    • 7,913

    #31
    Originally posted by Stuntman Mike

    Wow such a simp ...this guy actually makes p4p lists of female fighters

    Who is your fav trans athlete g@yboy?

    Says the guy spewing hate on every single women's boxing thread on this website Lmbao...

    You're boxingscene's biggest chick fan.

    Comment

    • Inspired
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2019
      • 2924
      • 412
      • 85
      • 34,524

      #32
      Originally posted by billeau2

      I don't know if she is on the juice... I just know there is virtually no consistency when we look at women's boxing. NUnes seems to have the most power... Its a myth about smaller glove size making punches more potent.

      Your invoking some sort of triangle theory above... Even with consistency this often does not logically tell us what we think it does... I would not think it tells us much about Taylor, though I have heard Breakhaus is excellent.
      you're saying triangle theories don't work, but then claiming nunez has the most power even though she's in a diff sport.
      you think ngannou would be anything in boxing?
      as i said, nunez is a juicer and that is blatantly obv. read up on it, her gym was known for steroid use inc the women.

      Comment

      • billeau2
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2012
        • 27641
        • 6,397
        • 14,933
        • 339,839

        #33
        Originally posted by Inspired

        you're saying triangle theories don't work, but then claiming nunez has the most power even though she's in a diff sport.
        you think ngannou would be anything in boxing?
        as i said, nunez is a juicer and that is blatantly obv. read up on it, her gym was known for steroid use inc the women.
        Nunez is not related to any triangle theory. Triangle theory has to do with looking at a common opponent vs two fighters and assuming that radical changes in the performance between the two opponents tells us more information than it might actually indicate.

        Ngannou is not a women boxer.

        I don't really care who is juicing... Men juice and we don't see the radical inconsistencies we see with women in combat sports.

        Comment

        • Inspired
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2019
          • 2924
          • 412
          • 85
          • 34,524

          #34
          Originally posted by billeau2

          Nunez is not related to any triangle theory. Triangle theory has to do with looking at a common opponent vs two fighters and assuming that radical changes in the performance between the two opponents tells us more information than it might actually indicate.

          Ngannou is not a women boxer.

          I don't really care who is juicing... Men juice and we don't see the radical inconsistencies we see with women in combat sports.
          i didnt say your nunez example was a triangle theory, i just said the logic behind you rejecting triangle theories is failing when you bring up nunez who is from an entirely diff sport, to compare her to boxers.

          eg
          'yeh i dont like to look at triangle theories cuz every fight is different, hard to compare'
          'nunez is a bigger puncher'
          there is no way for you to know she is a bigger puncher, unless she is in a fight with one of these female boxers.

          nunez and taylor are the same weight, nunez is taller..and yet nunez looks much stronger, more pumped. all that means is katie carries more water mass and has better endurance.

          ngannou is an example of someone who looks like a monster in ufc/mma but if he was a boxer, they'd make quick work of him.
          the standard in ufc is relatively poor. it's just marketed really well.

          look what jake paul did to some of these ufc guys.

          Comment

          • Earl-Hickey
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 29031
            • 2,832
            • 1,384
            • 297,750

            #35
            Originally posted by Inspired

            i didnt say your nunez example was a triangle theory, i just said the logic behind you rejecting triangle theories is failing when you bring up nunez who is from an entirely diff sport, to compare her to boxers.

            eg
            'yeh i dont like to look at triangle theories cuz every fight is different, hard to compare'
            'nunez is a bigger puncher'
            there is no way for you to know she is a bigger puncher, unless she is in a fight with one of these female boxers.

            nunez and taylor are the same weight, nunez is taller..and yet nunez looks much stronger, more pumped. all that means is katie carries more water mass and has better endurance.

            ngannou is an example of someone who looks like a monster in ufc/mma but if he was a boxer, they'd make quick work of him.
            the standard in ufc is relatively poor. it's just marketed really well.

            look what jake paul did to some of these ufc guys.
            I have to agree.

            Also note that Mcgregor was seen as a massive puncher in UFC and when he fought Floyd who he also massively outweighed, after a while Floyd realized he didn't even need to be concerned with Mcgregors punches.

            The standard of punch power between the two sports is huge.

            Comment

            • billeau2
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2012
              • 27641
              • 6,397
              • 14,933
              • 339,839

              #36
              Originally posted by Inspired

              i didnt say your nunez example was a triangle theory, i just said the logic behind you rejecting triangle theories is failing when you bring up nunez who is from an entirely diff sport, to compare her to boxers.

              eg
              'yeh i dont like to look at triangle theories cuz every fight is different, hard to compare'
              'nunez is a bigger puncher'
              there is no way for you to know she is a bigger puncher, unless she is in a fight with one of these female boxers.

              nunez and taylor are the same weight, nunez is taller..and yet nunez looks much stronger, more pumped. all that means is katie carries more water mass and has better endurance.

              ngannou is an example of someone who looks like a monster in ufc/mma but if he was a boxer, they'd make quick work of him.
              the standard in ufc is relatively poor. it's just marketed really well.

              look what jake paul did to some of these ufc guys.
              Umm thats a huge leap of logic there lol. Remember I qualified why I brought up Nunez. It wasn't contingent on any theory.

              Well... I can't know for sure about how big a puncher Nunez would be in boxing, but we have some indications. Nunes fought Holly didn't she? Holly being a boxer and all...

              Regarding Katie, etc... My point remains that none of the female boxers are big punchers... Whether it translates, or not, Nunez is a big puncher, who has fought the likes of Holly Holme.

              Regarding Ngannou were not talking men's combatives... totally different story.

              Yeah agree about Paul. I just wrote an article about it, as a matter of fact.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP