Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hugo Centeno Shocked, Drops Majority Decision To Antonio Todd

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
    how many times did you have to edit your comment before it made sense? you’ve already lost the debate as all you’ve been reduced to doing is talking in circles and making 2nd grade level insults, so I don’t need to add any additional facts as I’ve already proven my point. You would’ve also lost the bet I proposed but instead you pussed out because you knew you couldn’t back up anything you said. So take your fake wanna be Mexican gringo perspective elsewhere and learn to stop **** gobbling your celebrity man crushes and focus on the boxing topic being discussed.
    Well considering there's only 1 minute in between the edit you can go ask the mod to re-edit my original comment if you like only thing changed was a spacing mistake but if that makes you feel better by stealing my lines go for it because it makes sense either way. Like I said you lost and have nothing to say just repeating the same things you weak half breed. Everything I said is facts and it's there to be seen. Have you found that 1 champion at 160 for Charlo? I'm just asking for one dude can you find it?

    The bet you made was lost before you even made it since you stated that Charlos resume wasn't worse than Canelo's opponents therefore it's better it's there to be seen along with all your flip flops and edits. You never said equal until after you were called out on it, that's there to be seen as well. What about my bet? Where did I mention anything related to Canelo before you? He stays in your head just like what stays in your mothers mouth.

    The funny part is I never mentioned Canelo like you say I did in regards to Charlo, but you sure did mention Charlo alongside Plant, Saunders and Smith all Canelo's most recent opponents. You tried make a comparison and it backfired, then when presented with facts you went on to to say all their resumes are garbage but they are equals lmao. It's all there to be seen it really is and if you go back and edit it like you usually do, it will stay on my quotes regardless.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View Post
      Well considering there's only 1 minute in between the edit you can go ask the mod to re-edit my original comment if you like only thing changed was a spacing mistake but if that makes you feel better by stealing my lines go for it because it makes sense either way. Like I said you lost and have nothing to say just repeating the same things you weak half breed. Everything I said is facts and it's there to be seen. Have you found that 1 champion at 160 for Charlo? I'm just asking for one dude can you find it?

      The bet you made was lost before you even made it since you stated that Charlos resume wasn't worse than Canelo's opponents therefore it's better it's there to be seen along with all your flip flops and edits. You never said equal until after you were called out on it, that's there to be seen as well. What about my bet? Where did I mention anything related to Canelo before you? He stays in your head just like what stays in your mothers mouth.

      The funny part is I never mentioned Canelo like you say I did in regards to Charlo, but you sure did mention Charlo alongside Plant, Saunders and Smith all Canelo's most recent opponents. You tried make a comparison and it backfired, then when presented with facts you went on to to say all their resumes are garbage but they are equals lmao. It's all there to be seen it really is and if you go back and edit it like you usually do, it will stay on my quotes regardless.
      1. I stated Charlos resume wasn’t way worse. That can mean equally as bad or barely worse. Your comprehension is really horrible.

      2. your entire life is based on canelo and it’s clearly transparent why you wrote the initial comment you did. That’s why the other guy clowned you along with others and I finished it off. Stay on topic casual and stop looking for ways to defend canelo by demeaning charlo in an article about centeno. It won’t make you more of a Mexican to do that because you’re not really one to begin with.

      3. your proposed bet is irrelevant because I proposed one first and you pussed out. You should just delete your account at this point because you’re embarrassing yourself even more than your username has already done. But you won’t do that because you clearly have no dignity.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
        1. I stated Charlos resume wasn’t way worse. That can mean equally as bad or barely worse. Your comprehension is really horrible.

        2. your entire life is based on canelo and it’s clearly transparent why you wrote the initial comment you did. That’s why the other guy clowned you along with others and I finished it off. Stay on topic casual and stop looking for ways to defend canelo by demeaning charlo in an article about centeno. It won’t make you more of a Mexican to do that because you’re not really one to begin with.

        3. your proposed bet is irrelevant because I proposed one first and you pussed out. You should just delete your account at this point because you’re embarrassing yourself even more than your username has already done. But you won’t do that because you clearly have no dignity.
        1. That's bull**** and you know it you said it wasn't worse never did you say it was equal until I pointed out the facts moving on. You also forgot to mention where you said not like it's way worse than Smith, Plant and Saunders and then you said OH WAIT NO IT ISN'T that statement alone means that you believe his resume is better why would you need to say that if you thought they were equal all from the beginning? You could've just said it's not like it's way worse than theirs and end it there.

        2.My entire life is based on Canelo lmao you are the one who always brings him up. I think you are secretly in love with him like I said show me where I brought up anything related to Canelo oh that's right you still can't several posts later.

        3. Puss you clearly stated what you stated it's there to be seen like I said the bet never existed because you shot yourself in the foot from the start. Now my proposed bet is irrelevant because you can't do it. Like you said it wasn't worse than theirs meaning it's better it's there to be seen. If you would have said it was equal to theirs from the beginning then that would've been the end of it but you didn't show me where you said that. It wasn't until later when presented with facts that you changed your story to all their resumes suck and they are all equal. Did I mention it's there to be seen?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View Post
          1. That's bull**** and you know it you said it wasn't worse never did you say it was equal until I pointed out the facts moving on. You also forgot to mention where you said not like it's way worse than Smith, Plant and Saunders and then you said OH WAIT NO IT ISN'T that statement alone means that you believe his resume is better why would you need to say that if you thought they were equal all from the beginning? You could've just said it's not like it's way worse than theirs and end it there.

          2.My entire life is based on Canelo lmao you are the one who always brings him up. I think you are secretly in love with him like I said show me where I brought up anything related to Canelo oh that's right you still can't several posts later.

          3. Puss you clearly stated what you stated it's there to be seen like I said the bet never existed because you shot yourself in the foot from the start. Now my proposed bet is irrelevant because you can't do it. Like you said it wasn't worse than theirs meaning it's better it's there to be seen. If you would have said it was equal to theirs from the beginning then that would've been the end of it but you didn't show me where you said that. It wasn't until later when presented with facts that you changed your story to all their resumes suck and they are all equal. Did I mention it's there to be seen?
          -. Honest question, are you really this fkn ****** or are you just stubborn and refuse to admit you’re wrong). My guess is you’re an inbred ret@rd. I said “yeah charlos resume is way worse than plant, Saunders , Yidilgrim and smith “. And then said, wait no it isn’t. So if you were able to read, that means it is not way worse. Again that can mean equally crappy or slightly worse. Nowhere from that should you gather that it’s a much better resume. You’re just a dummy.

          2. You know the only reason for your post on here and your dislike for Charlo is due to the fact that you adore canelo. Everyone sees it and your shameless defense of him this entire time only proves that I’m right.

          3. I proposed a bet and you pussed out because you couldn’t back up something you tried to say was “fact”. Now you’re trying to twist things around like a scorned female. My story has been the same from my first post to now. You’re a fkn buffoon who brought up an irrelevant point to this article, you’re too ****** to understand basic English and you’re a fake Mexican who thinks being a canelo balls guzzler makes you more Mexican. Now delete your account ya lil b***h.


          Last edited by Jab jab boom; 01-27-2022, 07:13 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
            -. Honest question, are you really this fkn ****** or are you just stubborn and refuse to admit you’re wrong). My guess is you’re an inbred ret@rd. I said “yeah charlos resume is way worse than plant, Saunders , Yidilgrim and smith “. And then said, wait no it isn’t. So if you were able to read, that means it is not way worse. Again that can mean equally crappy or slightly worse. Nowhere from that should you gather that it’s a much better resume. You’re just a dummy.

            2. You know the only reason for your post on here and your dislike for Charlo is due to the fact that you adore canelo. Everyone sees it and your shameless defense of him this entire time only proves that I’m right.

            3. I proposed a bet and you pussed out because you couldn’t back up something you tried to say was “fact”. Now you’re trying to twist things around like a scorned female. My story has been the same from my first post to now. You’re a fkn buffoon who brought up an irrelevant point to this article, you’re too ****** to understand basic English and you’re a fake Mexican who thinks being a canelo balls guzzler makes you more Mexican. Now delete your account ya lil b***h.

            Another edited post repeating the same bull**** like I said it's there to be seen.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View Post
              Another edited post repeating the same bull**** like I said it's there to be seen.
              1. I edit typos due to the fact that you’re a borderline illiterate ret@rd. I know you can’t use context clues to figure out the typos. So you’re welcome.

              2 . Everything there is to be seen shows that you’re a ball guzzling hypocrite groupie with the username of a 12 yr old who can’t stay on topic. Which is why multiple people called you out for it.

              Comment


              • #37
                You two go get a room or something, nobody ever gave a F^CK about Hugo Centeno on this forum until...NOW? This Thread should be all the way on page 5 by now lol

                Comment


                • #38
                  Not surprised, anyone who has seen Hugo fight shouldn't be surprised. He is slow as hell.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by sicko View Post
                    You two go get a room or something, nobody ever gave a F^CK about Hugo Centeno on this forum until...NOW? This Thread should be all the way on page 5 by now lol
                    Nobody gave a fvvck about him when he fought Charlo either, which is kind of the point of these posters' fight.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                      1. I edit typos due to the fact that you’re a borderline illiterate ret@rd. I know you can’t use context clues to figure out the typos. So you’re welcome.

                      2 . Everything there is to be seen shows that you’re a ball guzzling hypocrite groupie with the username of a 12 yr old who can’t stay on topic. Which is why multiple people called you out for it.
                      Oh you edit typos? My comprehension of the English language is better than yours. We both grew up speaking a different language me Spanish you Ebonics but the difference is I actually went to college. Like I said it's all there to be seen it really is. I laid out all the facts that made you change your story 5 times. I didn't mention anything related to Canelo you did and it's there to be seen in case I didn't mention that. It's hilarious how much you hate him like he did something to you personally yet you love Charlo just because he's black regardless of his resume. You aren't even pure black yourself you are a fatherless half breed that could be mixed with anything since you don't even know who he is. You are also a crack baby so I don't blame you for your 47 chromosomes you couldn't help the way your mother was.

                      Just so we are clear Centeno is one of Charlos best 3 wins at middleweight. Yes or no? That's what I said that got you and your lover so triggered never anything about Canelo in case I didn't mention it, it's there to be seen. You also never listed your top 5 favorite current fighters so we can break down their resumes as well. So emotional over the Charlo brother with the weak ass resume nothing I stated was false yet somehow you threw Canelo in there when this was about Charlo and Centeno nothing more. Lol and you said my reading comprehension was bad you clearly stated Charlos resume was better than Canelos opponents, meanwhile I never even brought up Saul you did as well. So it's funny you are saying I'm making up stuff but it's there to be seen all in text, meanwhile show me where I mentioned Canelo in relation to Charlo. Oh wait you can't just like you could never find that 1 middleweight former champion on his resume I'm still waiting.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP