Comments Thread For: Hugo Centeno Shocked, Drops Majority Decision To Antonio Todd

[Kannabis Kid]

Your reading comprehension is extremely limited. You’re actually even dumber than the average Canelo fan which is like being the dumbest ret@rd in a class full of them. First you said that i implied Charlos resume was better than Canelo’s, and you based that on nothing. Then you stated that I said charlos resume was better than the recent opponents that canelo has faced when in reality , I just said it wasn’t way worse. To me, all of their resumes are crap. Here is my exact post, now try and read it slowly. “yeah, his resume is way worse than Plants , or Saunders or Yidilgrims, or Smith….oh wait. No it isn’t. “ Soooo ya pot smoking dope who uses the same user name from when he was 15 and clearly hasn’t matured a single day since, my comment clearly states that his resume isn’t way worse than theirs. Didn’t say his resume blows them out the water, or his resume is on par with Canelo’s who has bigger names but his entire run at 168 that you **** gobble him over is full of names with resumes just as sh**ty if not sh**tier. Can you grasp that or is the inbreeding in your family too strong to understand basic logic?

Flip flop scrambling your words have you found 1 champion Charlo has beat at 160 yet I'm still waiting? You clearly stated that Charlo has a better resume than Canelos last opponents it's there to be seen. Go find that champ Charlo fought please I want to see who can pull up from his deep resume at 160 jab jab *****. You also completely disregarded how BJS resume is better than Charlos or anyone he's faced because you know it's true my little *****. If you have any hair left which I truly doubt it's probably cut like a lesbian so stop crying already you little butch puss you can't stand the fact that I pointed out the facts about Charlos resume. It hurts so bad because you know it's true and you say I'm the one all on Canelo haha you are worse for Charlo and he doesn't have **** to show for. Yeah Canelo beats 3 undefeated champions at 168 and they suck Charlo doesn't even fight 1 champ at 160 and he's on par with all the opponents Canelo beat do you even listen to yourself? Always an excuse to favor your fighter I'm just stating facts once again can you please point out the champions Charlo has faced at 160?

[Jab jab boom]

Flip flop scrambling your words have you found 1 champion Charlo has beat at 160 yet I'm still waiting? You clearly stated that Charlo has a better resume than Canelos last opponents it's there to be seen. Go find that champ Charlo fought please I want to see who can pull up from his deep resume at 160 jab jab *****. You also completely disregarded how BJS resume is better than Charlos or anyone he's faced because you know it's true my little *****. If you have any hair left which I truly doubt it's probably cut like a lesbian so stop crying already you little butch puss you can't stand the fact that I pointed out the facts about Charlos resume. It hurts so bad because you know it's true and you say I'm the one all on Canelo haha you are worse for Charlo and he doesn't have **** to show for. Yeah Canelo beats 3 undefeated champions at 168 and they suck Charlo doesn't even fight 1 champ at 160 and he's on par with all the opponents Canelo beat do you even listen to yourself? Always an excuse to favor your fighter I'm just stating facts once again can you please point out the champions Charlo has faced at 160?

1. I’m not defending Charlos resume. I just said it’s not way worse than the guys canelo has fought at 160. You can keep harping on a champion at 168 but I don’t need to pick champs out because I never said he had a great resume. Not to mention guys like korobov and Derveyenchenko are just as dangerous as some of these other so called champions. Only casuals think a belt makes the fighter.

2. You said I clearly stated that charlo had a better resume despite me showing you my exact quotes that disprove that. Find a quote where I said that? You won’t be able to, so either you’re slow or just trying to maintain dignity. Which you’ve lost long ago.

3. Saunders resume is garbage too. You mentioned a bunch of names but no one of substance. Andy Lee? The guy got demolished by Chavez jr. Eubank jr? What???? Lmaooo. Lemieux? Cmon now. Just stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.

So the difference between you and I is, I’m not a groupie for any fighter. I don’t even like Charlo and thought he was a jerk since the J rock fight and how he conducted himself. I just enjoyed pointing out your blatant fan boy hypocrisy because canelo fans always expose themselves to be hypocrites and definitely lack intelligence as you have proven to be the case here with your limited ability to comprehend written words.

[Kannabis Kid]

1. I’m not defending Charlos resume. I just said it’s not way worse than the guys canelo has fought at 160. You can keep harping on a champion at 168 but I don’t need to pick champs out because I never said he had a great resume. Not to mention guys like korobov and Derveyenchenko are just as dangerous as some of these other so called champions. Only casuals think a belt makes the fighter.

2. You said I clearly stated that charlo had a better resume despite me showing you my exact quotes that disprove that. Find a quote where I said that? You won’t be able to, so either you’re slow or just trying to maintain dignity. Which you’ve lost long ago.

3. Saunders resume is garbage too. You mentioned a bunch of names but no one of substance. Andy Lee? The guy got demolished by Chavez jr. Eubank jr? What???? Lmaooo. Lemieux? Cmon now. Just stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.

So the difference between you and I is, I’m not a groupie for any fighter. I don’t even like Charlo and thought he was a jerk since the J rock fight and how he conducted himself. I just enjoyed pointing out your blatant fan boy hypocrisy because canelo fans always expose themselves to be hypocrites and definitely lack intelligence as you have proven to be the case here with your limited ability to comprehend written words.

1. I listed Sergey and Korobov (Who Charlo lost to but got a gift decision) as the best fighters he has on his resume you idiot. It's the same Korobov that Andy Lee knocked out and the same Andy Lee BJS beat for his world title. Oh but Andy Lee is garbage yet he knocked out the guy that should've got the decision against Charlo such a ****ing idiot dude pointless to even debate. Lee also knocked out the guy Jermell won his first title against 2 years before. So does that make Jermell's title win weak? Because Andy Lee knocked out Jackson first 2 years prior? And this was after he got knocked out by Chavez you moron I like Jermell he fights everyone but if you are going to use that triangle theory bull**** then you have to accept that as well.

2. You said Charlo's resume isn't worse than Saunders, Plant or Smith which is a flat out lie. Isn't means "is not" meaning it's not worse than theirs meaning it's better lol if it's not worse what is it? Do you know what the definition of worse is? Now you are saying they are "equal" (which they are not) because you got called out on it but that's not what you initially said. And after the fact you are now saying that Charlos resume is weak lol so at least I got the truth out of you. Didn't this all start because I stated that Centeno was one of his best 3 wins at 160? What false statement did I make?

3. As stated Saunders beat Andy Lee the same Andy Lee who knocked out Korobov. Do you know who Korobov is? Apparently you do because you listed it as one of the greatest wins of Charlos career and even said "only casuals think a belt makes the fighter" you know why Korobov never had a belt? Because Andy Lee knocked him out when he tried to win it. Everyone that's in bold that you stated are "no one of substance" have all been world champions at 160. What fighters on Charlos resume have been world champions at 160? You do realize that Charlo won his INTERIM world title against Centeno right? Which is why I came and said that this was one of his best wins at middleweight lmao.

Now you can stop you little puss because you literally contradict yourself every time. First it's his resume isn't worse than theirs, now you never said that, now they all have equal resumes then Korobov is an ATG even without a belt, but BJS resume is garbage even though he beat the guy who KNOCKED OUT Korobov for a belt.

Now once again can you name a champion Charlo has fought at 160? Even Lemieux has a better resume at 160 than Charlo but of course he's garbage to you because he doesn't fit your bull**** agenda. Biased little ***** you still can't name that 1 champ can you?

The difference between you and me is that you are here crying on a forum defending a fighter who hasn't accomplished much in his weight class while discrediting Canelo every chance you get. I come on here and state one sentence facts and you start crying like a little ***** defending your love interest. Canelo is above all your favorite fighters get over it I didn't even bring him up you did by listing his recent opponents so it shows how much he's in your head.

It's funny all I said was Centeno was one of Charlos best 3 wins at middleweight and it caused you to get so in your feelings like a female. It's pretty straight forward because what I said is true so why did you feel the need to come and defend? What are you trying to defend? Is it his weak resume? Because you even admitted yourself it's weak.

[Jab jab boom]

1. I listed Sergey and Korobov (Who Charlo lost to but got a gift decision) as the best fighters he has on his resume you idiot. It's the same Korobov that Andy Lee knocked out and the same Andy Lee BJS beat for his world title. Oh but Andy Lee is garbage yet he knocked out the guy that should've got the decision against Charlo such a ****ing idiot dude pointless to even debate. Lee also knocked out the guy Jermell won his first title against 2 years before. So does that make Jermell's title win weak? Because Andy Lee knocked out Jackson first 2 years prior? And this was after he got knocked out by Chavez you moron I like Jermell he fights everyone but if you are going to use that triangle theory bull**** then you have to accept that as well.

2. You said Charlo's resume isn't worse than Saunders, Plant or Smith which is a flat out lie. Isn't means "is not" meaning it's not worse than theirs meaning it's better lol if it's not worse what is it? Do you know what the definition of worse is? Now you are saying they are "equal" (which they are not) because you got called out on it but that's not what you initially said. And after the fact you are now saying that Charlos resume is weak lol so at least I got the truth out of you. Didn't this all start because I stated that Centeno was one of his best 3 wins at 160? What false statement did I make?

3. As stated Saunders beat Andy Lee the same Andy Lee who knocked out Korobov. Do you know who Korobov is? Apparently you do because you listed it as one of the greatest wins of Charlos career and even said "only casuals think a belt makes the fighter" you know why Korobov never had a belt? Because Andy Lee knocked him out when he tried to win it. Everyone that's in bold that you stated are "no one of substance" have all been world champions at 160. What fighters on Charlos resume have been world champions at 160? You do realize that Charlo won his INTERIM world title against Centeno right? Which is why I came and said that this was one of his best wins at middleweight lmao.

Now you can stop you little puss because you literally contradict yourself every time. First it's his resume isn't worse than theirs, now you never said that, now they all have equal resumes then Korobov is an ATG even without a belt, but BJS resume is garbage even though he beat the guy who KNOCKED OUT Korobov for a belt.

Now once again can you name a champion Charlo has fought at 160? Even Lemieux has a better resume at 160 than Charlo but of course he's garbage to you because he doesn't fit your bull**** agenda. Biased little ***** you still can't name that 1 champ can you?

The difference between you and me is that you are here crying on a forum defending a fighter who hasn't accomplished much in his weight class while discrediting Canelo every chance you get. I come on here and state one sentence facts and you start crying like a little ***** defending your love interest. Canelo is above all your favorite fighters get over it I didn't even bring him up you did by listing his recent opponents so it shows how much he's in your head.

It's funny all I said was Centeno was one of Charlos best 3 wins at middleweight and it caused you to get so in your feelings like a female. It's pretty straight forward because what I said is true so why did you feel the need to come and defend? What are you trying to defend? Is it his weak resume? Because you even admitted yourself it's weak.

Neither Andy Lee nor Korobov are elite. They’re all more or less on the same level. Korobov was clearly beating Lee until Lee landed 1 punch. Doesn’t mean Lee is significantly better, just means he landed one good shot in a fight he was otherwise losing. And this is my overall point. All of these guys resumes are basically on the same level. You desperately went out of your way to bring up Charlo’s resume in an article that had nothing to do with him just because like the fan boy you are, you wanted to make a point about him not being worthy of your hero Canelo. That’s like if I went into the thread when Sadaam Ali beat Cotto and said, wow that’s crazy. Canelo says Cotto was the biggest win of his career and Cotto just got beat up by Sadaam Ali. How weak is Canelo’s biggest win?

So your bozo post was called out by others and confirmed by me that you’re a moron. Your reasoning was transparent and hypocritical because all of Canelo’s opponents at 168 have crap resumes. Me Saying charlos isn’t worse doesn’t mean better. It means equally crappy but with your limited brain cells from smoking too much, you somehow gathered that I said charlo has a great resume that is better than Canelo’s and anyone he’s ever fought. You’re a fkn simpleton.

[Kannabis Kid]

Neither Andy Lee nor Korobov are elite. They’re all more or less on the same level. Korobov was clearly beating Lee until Lee landed 1 punch. Doesn’t mean Lee is significantly better, just means he landed one good shot in a fight he was otherwise losing. And this is my overall point. All of these guys resumes are basically on the same level. You desperately went out of your way to bring up Charlo’s resume in an article that had nothing to do with him just because like the fan boy you are, you wanted to make a point about him not being worthy of your hero Canelo. That’s like if I went into the thread when Sadaam Ali beat Cotto and said, wow that’s crazy. Canelo says Cotto was the biggest win of his career and Cotto just got beat up by Sadaam Ali. How weak is Canelo’s biggest win?

So your bozo post was called out by others and confirmed by me that you’re a moron. Your reasoning was transparent and hypocritical because all of Canelo’s opponents at 168 have crap resumes. Me Saying charlos isn’t worse doesn’t mean better. It means equally crappy but with your limited brain cells from smoking too much, you somehow gathered that I said charlo has a great resume that is better than Canelo’s and anyone he’s ever fought. You’re a fkn simpleton.

Nice excuse discrediting Lee's win at the end of the day he knocked him out standing and Korobov never became a champ Lee did but I guess if you think it helps Charlos undeserved win over him look better go for it. I didn't bring up anything related to Canelo, you did. Your comparison doesn't make any sense because Ali beat a past prime fighter in Cotto and Canelo beat him 2 years before when he was going on his run at "middleweight" in case you forgot Cotto didn't look amazing in the Kamegai fight meanwhile when he fought Canelo he was coming off the Geale knockout.

When Canelo means that was his biggest win he is referring to beating a fighter that has a legacy something Charlo has yet to create and he's already in his 30's. We are talking about fighters who are in their primes and who has the better resume at the moment so stop with the ****** comparisons you discredited a bunch of the fighters I listed and then when presented facts about some of the fighters they faced you just switch it up again. Never did I relate anything to Canelo that's just your mind playing tricks on you because like I said he lives in your head.

Flip flop again you said it wasn't worse than Smith, Saunders, Plant and Yildirim Canelos last 4 opponents. Therefore you are saying that Charlos resume is better if it's not worse that means they are at a lower level. If you would have said Charlos resume is equal to them from the start then that's something else but you didn't say that until I called you out on it now you are changing your story. When you said that Charlo's resume is better than all of them because you did, you are insinuating that Canelo is fighting nobody and therefore Charlo is fighting the same level of competition if not better. Now we all know that's not true when has Charlo fought a champion at 160? I've been waiting for that answer a few posts now, but when Canelo fights 3 undefeated champions in one year they are all bums haha. Charlo has barely fought 3 champions in his entire career (Bundrage, Trout, Williams) let alone in 1 year and they were all at 154 lbs.

Oh nice bro your confirmation is held to such a high standard I'm so sad that you denounced my facts that seemed hurt you so bad. What do you do with your life? You have like 3x my posts in less than 4 years and half of them probably mention Canelo haha.

[Jab jab boom]

Nice excuse discrediting Lee's win at the end of the day he knocked him out standing and Korobov never became a champ Lee did but I guess if you think it helps Charlos undeserved win over him look better go for it. I didn't bring up anything related to Canelo, you did. Your comparison doesn't make any sense because Ali beat a past prime fighter in Cotto and Canelo beat him 2 years before when he was going on his run at "middleweight" in case you forgot Cotto didn't look amazing in the Kamegai fight meanwhile when he fought Canelo he was coming off the Geale knockout.

When Canelo means that was his biggest win he is referring to beating a fighter that has a legacy something Charlo has yet to create and he's already in his 30's. We are talking about fighters who are in their primes and who has the better resume at the moment so stop with the ****** comparisons you discredited a bunch of the fighters I listed and then when presented facts about some of the fighters they faced you just switch it up again. Never did I relate anything to Canelo that's just your mind playing tricks on you because like I said he lives in your head.

Flip flop again you said it wasn't worse than Smith, Saunders, Plant and Yildirim Canelos last 4 opponents. Therefore you are saying that Charlos resume is better if it's not worse that means they are at a lower level. If you would have said Charlos resume is equal to them from the start then that's something else but you didn't say that until I called you out on it now you are changing your story. When you said that Charlo's resume is better than all of them because you did, you are insinuating that Canelo is fighting nobody and therefore Charlo is fighting the same level of competition if not better. Now we all know that's not true when has Charlo fought a champion at 160? I've been waiting for that answer a few posts now, but when Canelo fights 3 undefeated champions in one year they are all bums haha. Charlo has barely fought 3 champions in his entire career (Bundrage, Trout, Williams) let alone in 1 year and they were all at 154 lbs.

Oh nice bro your confirmation is held to such a high standard I'm so sad that you denounced my facts that seemed hurt you so bad. What do you do with your life? You have like 3x my posts in less than 4 years and half of them probably mention Canelo haha.

just because you type a lot of words, doesn’t mean you’re making a relevant point. You went out of your way to criticize Charlos resume in a post that had 0 to do with him. Pretend all you want but the only reason you’re doing that is because you’re a canelo ball guzzler. So all I did was expose that everyone canelo has faced at 168 has a crap resume too and you’re trying to jump through hoops to pretend that’s not the case. Especially with Saunders who by the way, never beat a champ at 168 either, yet that didn’t stop Canelo from picking him. You only want to focus on charlo not beating a champ at 160 despite the fact that canelo gave up the belt that charlo has now instead of fighting him. The same way he gave up the ibf title instead of facing Derveyenchenko. The same Derveyenchenko that probably has a stronger case for beating ggg than Canelo does.

Oh and as for that Cotto win, not sure if you’re blinded by constantly having Canelo’s balls tea bagging your face but little 36 yr old Cotto was washed up before Canelo fought him.

Final point, your bolded comment above. You’re saying I said charlos resume was better than all of them despite me showing that I said it’s “not way worse”. Let’s make a deal. Either you find my quote in this thread where I said charlos resume was better or you delete your account at that ****** ass loser username. If you find me saying those words in here, I’ll delete my account. If not, you delete yours. Deal?
Watch how you try to weasel your wannabe Mexican self out of this one.

[Kannabis Kid]

just because you type a lot of words, doesn’t mean you’re making a relevant point. You went out of your way to criticize Charlos resume in a post that had 0 to do with him. Pretend all you want but the only reason you’re doing that is because you’re a canelo ball guzzler. So all I did was expose that everyone canelo has faced at 168 has a crap resume too and you’re trying to jump through hoops to pretend that’s not the case. Especially with Saunders who by the way, never beat a champ at 168 either, yet that didn’t stop Canelo from picking him. You only want to focus on charlo not beating a champ at 160 despite the fact that canelo gave up the belt that charlo has now instead of fighting him. The same way he gave up the ibf title instead of facing Derveyenchenko. The same Derveyenchenko that probably has a stronger case for beating ggg than Canelo does.

Oh and as for that Cotto win, not sure if you’re blinded by constantly having Canelo’s balls tea bagging your face but little 36 yr old Cotto was washed up before Canelo fought him.

Final point, your bolded comment above. You’re saying I said charlos resume was better than all of them despite me showing that I said it’s “not way worse”. Let’s make a deal. Either you find my quote in this thread where I said charlos resume was better or you delete your account at that ****** ass loser username. If you find me saying those words in here, I’ll delete my account. If not, you delete yours. Deal?
Watch how you try to weasel your wannabe Mexican self out of this one.

Lmao everything I've stated is facts you just can't admit it BJS resume is better than Charlos. You are right BJS didn't fight a champion at 168 he won a vacant belt just like Charlo did at 160 lmao that's why Canelo picked him because he had a belt. The difference is he only had 3 fights while campaigning at 168 before fighting Canelo meanwhile Charlo has been at Middleweight for years and he still hasn't fought a champ also he was offered a fight against Canelo in the past and his handlers turned it down. Regardless of whether he fought a champion at 168 he had a belt at 160 and he fought more champions at 160 than Charlo did therefore his resume is better overall which is what this initial weak debate was about with your flip flop ways.

Funny you were the one who brought up Canelo's opponents not me and coming up with conspiracy theories like I'm out to prove Charlo isn't worthy to fight him haha. I never even mentioned Canelo he lives in your head you literally just wrote Canelo 7 times in your short post lmao. I mentioned how Centeno is one of Charlos best wins at middleweight. Is that a lie? You still can't name that 1 champion that Charlo fought at 160 I'm waiting.

Nothing but excuses from you Cotto had just beat the same Geale that GGG fought but it was ok for GGG to fight him that's how you ***** ass fickle fans are unless it's your favorite fighter fighting someone it's ok if not everyone else who fights is fighting a bum. For example how much of an idiot I made you look like in regards to Korobov. The guy who beat up Charlo and couldn't miss with his left hand and he's a badass ATG who never won a belt. When Andy Lee knocks him out before it was a lucky punch and Lee is garbage just because Saunders beat him lol you are truly an idiot man it's all there to be seen.

Find my quote where I mentioned anything in relation to Canelo first and I will delete my account you dumbass *****. The first thing you inferred is that Saunders, Smith and Plants resume were worse than Charlos. I'm not going to keep explaining it to you because your dumbass obviously won't admit it. It's there to be seen. You even went back and later claimed they were "equal" after being called out on it you never in your initial post did it state they were equal not once, you were trying to prove a weak point and say that Charlo is a better fighter than all 3 based off their "weak resumes" which you also said they have then when I laid out Saunders resume you completely discredited it. I said Plant and Smith have similar resumes to Charlo it's there to be seen. I thought I was the one with the bad reading comprehension haha.

List your top 5 favorite fighter's lets break down their resumes guarantee the **** you are talking about Canelo 24/7 can be applied to some. Now once again stop crying just because I brought up nothing but facts against one of your favorite fighters. Let's see what dumbass crap your light skinned wannabe not black enough not white enough self has to say now.

[Jab jab boom]

Lmao everything I've stated is facts you just can't admit it BJS resume is better than Charlos. You are right BJS didn't fight a champion at 168 he won a vacant belt just like Charlo did at 160 lmao that's why Canelo picked him because he had a belt. The difference is he only had 3 fights while campaigning at 168 before fighting Canelo meanwhile Charlo has been at Middleweight for years and he still hasn't fought a champ also he was offered a fight against Canelo in the past and his handlers turned it down. Regardless of whether he fought a champion at 168 he had a belt at 160 and he fought more champions at 160 than Charlo did therefore his resume is better overall which is what this initial weak debate was about with your flip flop ways.

Funny you were the one who brought up Canelo's opponents not me and coming up with conspiracy theories like I'm out to prove Charlo isn't worthy to fight him haha. I never even mentioned Canelo he lives in your head you literally just wrote Canelo 7 times in your short post lmao. I mentioned how Centeno is one of Charlos best wins at middleweight. Is that a lie? You still can't name that 1 champion that Charlo fought at 160 I'm waiting.

Nothing but excuses from you Cotto had just beat the same Geale that GGG fought but it was ok for GGG to fight him that's how you ***** ass fickle fans are unless it's your favorite fighter fighting someone it's ok if not everyone else who fights is fighting a bum. For example how much of an idiot I made you look like in regards to Korobov. The guy who beat up Charlo and couldn't miss with his left hand and he's a badass ATG who never won a belt. When Andy Lee knocks him out before it was a lucky punch and Lee is garbage just because Saunders beat him lol you are truly an idiot man it's all there to be seen.

Find my quote where I mentioned anything in relation to Canelo first and I will delete my account you dumbass *****. The first thing you inferred is that Saunders, Smith and Plants resume were worse than Charlos. I'm not going to keep explaining it to you because your dumbass obviously won't admit it. It's there to be seen. You even went back and later claimed they were "equal" after being called out on it you never in your initial post did it state they were equal not once, you were trying to prove a weak point and say that Charlo is a better fighter than all 3 based off their "weak resumes" which you also said they have then when I laid out Saunders resume you completely discredited it. I said Plant and Smith have similar resumes to Charlo it's there to be seen. I thought I was the one with the bad reading comprehension haha.

List your top 5 favorite fighter's lets break down their resumes guarantee the **** you are talking about Canelo 24/7 can be applied to some. Now once again stop crying just because I brought up nothing but facts against one of your favorite fighters. Let's see what dumbass crap your light skinned wannabe not black enough not white enough self has to say now.

Spare me the novel of you blabbering in circles and making no valid points. You’ve already been owned and your hypocrisy has been proven. You also insisted that I said Charlos resume was better than all of them and then spun that into saying it was better than Canelo’s. Now that I asked you to back that up by sharing a quote of mine stating that, you’ve tried to weasel your way out just like I predicted you would. God forbid you have to delete your teeny bopper account with that pathetic username. It’s obviously the highlight of your life. Next time stick to the subject of the article being discussed and keep your Canelo love under control, or risk being embarrassed just as you have been all throughout this thread.

[Kannabis Kid]

Spare me the novel of you blabbering in circles and making no valid points. You’ve already been owned and your hypocrisy has been proven. You also insisted that I said Charlos resume was better than all of them and then spun that into saying it was better than Canelo’s. Now that I asked you to back that up by sharing a quote of mine stating that, you’ve tried to weasel your way out just like I predicted you would. God forbid you have to delete your teeny bopper account with that pathetic username. It’s obviously the highlight of your life. Next time stick to the subject of the article being discussed and keep your Canelo love under control, or risk being embarrassed just as you have been all throughout this thread.

Oh ok in other words I have nothing to offer in terms of substance because I already got facts thrown at me and I dropped them just like everything in life. Got it, look you mentioned Canelo again he is embedded in your mind. I understand you were raised without a father and your whore of mother smoked a lot of **** during your childhood so it makes sense why you hate smoking. What I can't understand is why you hate Mexicans so much? It must be because of the salchicha your mother was smoking.

I did stick to the topic at hand I mentioned Charlo in a post related to one of his best wins at middleweight. Is this a lie? What I do know is you brought up Canelos opponents and then went on a rant about him that much is true. As I've said before and I'll continue to say, it's all there to be seen.

[Jab jab boom]

Oh ok in other words I have nothing to offer in terms of substance because I already got facts thrown at me and I dropped them just like everything in life. Got it, look you mentioned Canelo again he is embedded in your mind. I understand you were raised without a father and your whore of mother smoked a lot of **** during your childhood so it makes sense why you hate smoking. What I can't understand is why you hate Mexicans so much? It must be because of the salchicha your mother was smoking.

I did stick to the topic at hand I mentioned Charlo in a post related to one of his best wins at middleweight. Is this a lie? What I do know is you brought up Canelos opponents and then went on a rant about him that much is true. As I've said before and I'll continue to say, it's all there to be seen.

how many times did you have to edit your comment before it made sense? you’ve already lost the debate as all you’ve been reduced to doing is talking in circles and making 2nd grade level insults, so I don’t need to add any additional facts as I’ve already proven my point. You would’ve also lost the bet I proposed but instead you pussed out because you knew you couldn’t back up anything you said. So take your fake wanna be Mexican gringo perspective elsewhere and learn to stop **** gobbling your celebrity man crushes and focus on the boxing topic being discussed.