Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Russell: The Pound-For-Pound List Is A Popularity Contest, It's Not Based Upon Skill

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    This guy chose to stall his career for years. Inactivity has hurt him. He should have kept busy, kept himself relevant. But you can't expect to crawl out of the woodwork once per year or even less, and demand the top fights.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
      Father Time is undefeated, so no surprise there! However, I still want to see Tank vs. GRJ! Both 5'5", both Slick Southpaws, both from the DMV! I love it!
      The difference is power not speed. Tank all day long.

      Comment


      • #63
        P4P lists might actually be popularity contests but either way no fighter that only fights maybe one a year can be on it. Especially one that lost badly to the only truly great fighter he ever fought. And I’m a Russell fan.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Wacked_Out View Post

          The difference is power not speed. Tank all day long.
          Not so sure! Tank gets hit a lot! GRJ would be the most skilled fighter he has ever faced! I want to see it!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post

            There is a glaring flaw in your logic, Terence Crawford's dominant performances in two divisions against the highest ranked available opponents, merits credit.

            For 'Bud' to continue the campaign of domination in his third weight and be considered the #1 welterweight in the world. and favorite against Spence already says enough about his level. Canelo Alvarez is probably the only other boxer that has been rated as long as Terence Crawford in the P4P, and yet Saul was removed for a year for violating VADA.

            Lastly, if it takes just won boxer to validate 'Bud' who has been seriously injured in a car-wreck and recently had a injury to the retina of one of his eyes, I can imagine that critics will never give Crawford his due respect.
            .
            Besides beating Porter, who had multiple losses prior to them fighting, who is Bud's best WW win ?
            If Bud beats Spence, I will give him all the credit he deserves.
            As it stands, he's getting way too much credit.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

              Pac's WW resume is soft. JMM, maybe Bradley, are the only names worth mentioning (that didn't have an *).
              Bradley is a nobody, he only beat Devin Alexander and Marquez. He ducked Amir khan and Errol spence and many others. Pacquiao beat cotto, de la hoya, hatton, margarito, erik morales , marco barrera etc. he was on peds but still

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by mexiFistology View Post

                Bradley is a nobody, he only beat Devin Alexander and Marquez. He ducked Amir khan and Errol spence and many others. Pacquiao beat cotto, de la hoya, hatton, margarito, erik morales , marco barrera etc. he was on peds but still
                Pac, pre WW, was ok.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by mexiFistology View Post

                  Bradley is a nobody, he only beat Devin Alexander and Marquez. He ducked Amir khan and Errol spence and many others. Pacquiao beat cotto, de la hoya, hatton, margarito, erik morales , marco barrera etc. he was on peds but still
                  Your logic is terrible. So your saying Tim is a nobody but had a tough resume(by no means a legendary one but definitely solid) and easily beat JMM, who brought hell to Pac in not 3 but 4 fights is a nobody. That's just plain silly. I wanted that Khan fight but he was focused on fighting Pacquiao who not only brought in more revenue but was hof status so it was an easy pick. However Tim should've fought Khan after the rematch with Pac. Ej (Spence) fight didn't matter as Tim was on the back 9 at that point in his career.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP