Is Miguel Cotto LURING Ricky Hatton in for another BIG payday?..
Collapse
-
The Hatton of 2005 is exactly the same as the 2009 version, the only difference is the 2005 was madly overated version, the 2009 is the exposed version. Any version would easily get ***ed up by Cotto.Comment
-
Shut up fool. hatton of today isnt the same as the hatton of 2005. why do you think he won the ring mag fighter of the year award!!!!! for being over rated?? your just a hater.Comment
-
I think Ricky Hatton has always had the same style..he's always been a bully..come foward hands down, clinch-star..
Cotto-Hatton at 140 woulda been 50-50 tho..due to many factors...such as experience, weight issues, etc..but at 147..in 2005-2009 Cotto wrecks Hattons world!!..Comment
-
Stop crying you little *****, face reality he is the same but now we know how overated he really was. ****** he got that because no ene else did **** that year and he outwrestled an old Tszyu.
Comment
-
Nah man..
I think Ricky Hatton has always had the same style..he's always been a bully..come foward hands down, clinch-star..
Cotto-Hatton at 140 woulda been 50-50 tho..due to many factors...such as experience, weight issues, etc..but at 147..in 2005-2009 Cotto wrecks Hattons world!!..
i dont see it like that, we seen what an effective pressure fighter did to cotto. And what im saying is, that in 2005 hatton was one of the best at pressuring an opponent. i agree hatton would find it much harder at 147, but then again hatton aint a welterweight.Comment
-
So nobody in the world of boxing did anything in 2005??????Comment
-
yes, but in 2005, he was quicker, sharper, and had much better punch resistance than he does today.
i dont see it like that, we seen what an effective pressure fighter did to cotto. And what im saying is, that in 2005 hatton was one of the best at pressuring an opponent. i agree hatton would find it much harder at 147, but then again hatton aint a welterweight.
Only thing I'd be worried about..is Hatton's body attack..it was awesome..and underrated..but I don't think it was ever better than Cotto's even at 140..Comment
Comment