"fight should of been stopped on cuts" controversy

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MoneyKasha
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2017
    • 2005
    • 155
    • 0
    • 72,457

    #1

    "fight should of been stopped on cuts" controversy

    do you guys agree with some of the sentiment i been hearing...some people think the Beterbiev fight should of stopped and he should of got the L because of his bad cut, some argued the same for Fury having that bad cut against Otto Wallin..

    what are your general thoughts on these types of controversies?
  • Outwest Exp 355
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2012
    • 9759
    • 1,183
    • 921
    • 47,595

    #2
    Didn’t watch the fight but would it of mattered? It still goes to scorecards. Was he winning the fight or would going to the cards have changed the outcome?

    Comment

    • daggum
      All time great
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 43604
      • 4,605
      • 3
      • 166,270

      #3
      ref in fury-wallin ruled it a punch so fury would have lost if he couldnt continue. this was ruled as a headbutt so it would have gone to the cards and beterbiev would have won presumably since after 4-5 rounds he was clearly ahead

      Comment

      • 4truth
        U can't handle the Truth
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2016
        • 15274
        • 4,151
        • 1,671
        • 197,686

        #4
        There is no scenario where Browne gets a win. Cut was caused by a clash of heads and after 4 Browne wasn’t winning

        Comment

        • SilverMiles
          It Was A Draw Doe!!!!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2014
          • 4436
          • 488
          • 102
          • 35,552

          #5
          The cut happened in round 3 so that would have led to a No-Contest. After 4 I had the fight even so that would have just resulted in a draw. I don't see how Beterbiev would have lost the fight in any scenario since Browne clearly lost both the 3rd and the 4th.

          Comment

          • MoneyKasha
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2017
            • 2005
            • 155
            • 0
            • 72,457

            #6
            Originally posted by SilverMiles
            The cut happened in round 3 so that would have led to a No-Contest. After 4 I had the fight even so that would have just resulted in a draw. I don't see how Beterbiev would have lost the fight in any scenario since Browne clearly lost both the 3rd and the 4th.
            would of been a draw since Browne won the first two rounds and Beterbiev won 3 and 4

            Comment

            • lopetego
              Undisputed Champion
              • Mar 2012
              • 3956
              • 763
              • 80
              • 35,285

              #7
              Originally posted by MoneyKasha
              do you guys agree with some of the sentiment i been hearing...some people think the Beterbiev fight should of stopped and he should of got the L because of his bad cut, some argued the same for Fury having that bad cut against Otto Wallin..

              what are your general thoughts on these types of controversies?
              I hate rerefee stoppages on cuts

              That's how they robbed Vitali off his W against Lewis

              If the fighter and his corner are willing to continue, then let the fight continue

              to me, any bull**** W on cuts isn't a real victory

              just like Lewis' bull**** W over Vitali. It surely helped Lewis that the doctor was black on that one
              Last edited by lopetego; 12-19-2021, 06:23 PM.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP