Comments Thread For: Spence-Ugas Title Unification in Play; Stanionis Agrees To Step Aside, Will Next Face Butaev

[aboutfkntime]

Not sure if you understand how numbers work, but 70/30 is no further away from 60/40 than 50/50 is.

not sure if you understand boxing, or common-sense...

a 50/50 offer stands a MUCH better chance of success, than a 70/30 offer... when the fighter in question is... a) possibly the very best fighter on the planet, #2 at worst... very few insiders think that you can actually beat him

if you weren't so busy being a fanboy bltch you would acknowledge that






...

[WBC WBA IBF]

a 50/50 offer stands a MUCH better chance of success, than a 70/30 offer

Wrong. Spence has the two most important belts. Crawford has the least important belt. Spence has been successful on PPV. Crawford has been a flop on PPV. 50/50 is completely ridiculous and had a 0% chance of happening. Spence is a much bigger draw than Crawford. It's not a 50/50 fight.

[Gary Coleman]

not sure if you understand boxing, or common-sense...

a 50/50 offer stands a MUCH better chance of success, than a 70/30 offer... when the fighter in question is... a) possibly the very best fighter on the planet, #2 at worst... very few insiders think that you can actually beat him

if you weren't so busy being a fanboy bltch you would acknowledge that






...

Bud is NEVER getting a 50/50 split. Why would he? He doesn't deserve it.

Spence is the bigger draw, has more belts and the better resume.

I don't know why this is so hard to understand.

[aboutfkntime]

Bud is NEVER getting a 50/50 split. Why would he? He doesn't deserve it.

Spence is the bigger draw, has more belts and the better resume.

I don't know why this is so hard to understand.

Spence is NOT a star... how hard is that to understand ?

FACT: Crawford is a BETTER fighter, and will be the betting favorite in that matchup... how hard is that to understand ?

THAT... is why Team Spence made that absurd demand LMAO






.

[aboutfkntime]

Wrong. Spence has the two most important belts. Crawford has the least important belt. Spence has been successful on PPV. Crawford has been a flop on PPV. 50/50 is completely ridiculous and had a 0% chance of happening. Spence is a much bigger draw than Crawford. It's not a 50/50 fight.

when has that EVER been a deciding factor in the purse split ?

how long have you been following this sport ?

Spence is NOT a star... how hard is that to understand ?

FACT: Crawford is a BETTER fighter, and will be the betting favorite in that matchup... how hard is that to understand ?

THAT... is why Team Spence made that absurd demand LMAO






...

[aboutfkntime]

...






Spence either wants that fight, to prove that he is better than Crawford... because, most insiders doubt that he is... or... he does not

FACT: a 70/30 take-it-or-leave-it demand... means, that he does not... AND HE KNOWS IT

AND SO DO YOU MUPPETS !!

WBC ASDFG... already admitted that

not hard to figure that one out LMAO






...

[Gary Coleman]

Spence is NOT a star... how hard is that to understand ?

FACT: Crawford is a BETTER fighter, and will be the betting favorite in that matchup... how hard is that to understand ?

THAT... is why Team Spence made that absurd demand LMAO






.

Spence is a bigger star than Bud. Nothing you say is going to change that. Cry all you want, he ain't getting 50/50.

[WBC WBA IBF]

when has that EVER been a deciding factor in the purse split ?

The belts influence purses in nearly every fight and have for over a century.

how long have you been following this sport ?[

Been closely following the sport for over 30 years and have worked in the sport for over 20 years. My join date is also many many years before yours.

Spence is NOT a star... how hard is that to understand ?

Spence has made over $10 million in ONE fight before. Crawford has never made more than $6 million. There's no universe where these two are equals deserving of a 50/50 purse split. The numbers don't support your position.

FACT: Crawford is a BETTER fighter

That's an opinion and you look like a fool when you prove that you don't know what words mean.

But even if he is the better fighter, that has nothing to do with the economics of the fight. Spence's PPVs are way way way more successful than Crawford's PPVs. It's not even close.

[aboutfkntime]

Spence is a bigger star than Bud. Nothing you say is going to change that. Cry all you want, he ain't getting 50/50.

FACT: neither of them are stars

stop the bullshlt






...

[aboutfkntime]

The belts influence purses in nearly every fight and have for over a century.




Been closely following the sport for over 30 years and have worked in the sport for over 20 years. My join date is also many many years before yours.




Spence has made over $10 million in ONE fight before. Crawford has never made more than $6 million. There's no universe where these two are equals deserving of a 50/50 purse split. The numbers don't support your position.




That's an opinion and you look like a fool when you prove that you don't know what words mean.

But even if he is the better fighter, that has nothing to do with the economics of the fight. Spence's PPVs are way way way more successful than Crawford's PPVs. It's not even close.

bullshlt !!

money does... and it has been that way for over a century, back when there was only one belt LMAO

but yea, you wouldn't know anything about that... wouldya? ... Mr ABC bullshlt

FACT: you admitted that 70/30 is not reasonable... so yea... it was unnecessary bullshlt, that killed any chance of that fight happening

keep waving your pom-pom's

FACT: Crawford would be a distinct favorite in that fight... which is why Spence has shown no interest in that fight






...