Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Lomachenko, Crawford, Canelo, Fury-Usyk, Benn, More

[Walexhris]

U

"I’m curious to see if Loma will be able to pick who he wants to fight or will he be made to fight"

What sort of horse manure is this talk, loma pretty much fights anyone, this guy bread is for the fairies sometimes, he should look at others in the LW division and apply that, keep dreaming bread, u need buttering i think

U misunderstood

[Walexhris]

You're suggesting the Mexican learned Mexican-style pressure fighting from Golovkin?

I don't think you can classify canelo's type of pressure as Mexican-style pressure fighting, it's also nothing like the Golovkin styled pressure.....but I also think this canelo was born during the Golovkin rematch

[Walexhris]

If I remember correctly the winner of a boxing round always gets the 10 points, there is no 9-8 or 9-9 rounds.
Even in a situation where both fighters get knocked down, the more dominant fighter that round will get the 10 points.

Have the rules for this changed lately? I’m confused by his answer to the Teo round.

There is actually

[ShoulderRoll]

I don't think you can clasify canelo's type of pressure as Mexican-style pressure fighting, it's also nothing like the Golovkin styled pressure.....but I also think this canelo was born during the Golovkin rematch

Canelo does stalk more after the Golovkin fights, but the one change that really stands out to me since then is that he tends to load up on his punches a lot now. He throws less and is more economical, but looks to land with maximum power.

I felt that hurt him a little against Caleb Plant. And you could hear Reynoso asking him to let his hands go and box more instead of looking for that one punch.

[Pago007]

That's hilarious. What hand fed opponents?

Nakatoni and Commey

[JULESLUPOWITZ]

On your comment about the automatic 10/8 score on knockdowns, when & where’d this rule change? Doesn’t automatic 10/8 round exclude the knocked down fighter’s comeback? Even if he does bounce back to outland the guy who knocked him down, isn’t “automatic 10/8” supposed to stand? If not then what’s the point of that rule?

Thanking you fir your displayed knowledge, entirely!

[The D3vil]

Funny how people always notice the lessons Canelo learnt from Floyd but tend to fail to notice - or at least credit - the development he took from GGG 1. To my eye it's since then that Canelo really became the patient stalking pressure fighter that he is today - forcing the errors instead of waiting for them - and it's very much to his credit that he's able to adapt and learn from the fighters he shares a ring with, and take the best part of their styles and make it his own.

This right here.

I always tell people Canelo's a way different fighter than the guy who fought GGG twice.

After Floyd, he could still be hit, as the fights against Lara, Khan, and Cotto showed.

He's looked like a world beater especially since the Jacobs fight

[The D3vil]

LMAO at overrating Michael Spinks. The guy was about as good as Nathan Cleverly. Beat a bunch of C/D/E guys, then the shell of Larry Holmes, who was crap anyway, then lost to Tyson in R1, the same man who lost against the 5 best opponents he faced - Lewis, Holyfied X2, Buster, Danny the Brixton Bomber" Williams, and McBride. Nash out.

Tyson absolutely didn't lose to the 5 best opponents he ever fought.

Razor Ruddock was better than Douglas, so was Tony Tucker who beat Douglas, so was Pinklon Thomas, and so was Frank Bruno.

He lost to Douglas after not training & staying up the whole night with Bobby Brown ****ing strippers in Tokyo.

He lost to Holyfied 2x after spending 3 years in prison and Lewis 16 years after winning the HW title.

Williams and McBride beat Tyson when he was almost 20 years past 1st winning the title.

Troll post.

[daggum]

Funny how people always notice the lessons Canelo learnt from Floyd but tend to fail to notice - or at least credit - the development he took from GGG 1. To my eye it's since then that Canelo really became the patient stalking pressure fighter that he is today - forcing the errors instead of waiting for them - and it's very much to his credit that he's able to adapt and learn from the fighters he shares a ring with, and take the best part of their styles and make it his own.

yeah since getting caught for using ped's he has looked a lot better

[Nash out]

Tyson absolutely didn't lose to the 5 best opponents he ever fought.

Razor Ruddock was better than Douglas, so was Tony Tucker who beat Douglas, so was Pinklon Thomas, and so was Frank Bruno.

He lost to Douglas after not training & staying up the whole night with Bobby Brown ****ing strippers in Tokyo.

He lost to Holyfied 2x after spending 3 years in prison and Lewis 16 years after winning the HW title.

Williams and McBride beat Tyson when he was almost 20 years past 1st winning the title.

Troll post.

Christ! It must be nice for a fighter to have an excuse for every loss. How about this, all his losses were legit, but all his wins, the other guys were out ****ing strippers, not training, having problems at home, have been struck with a voodoo curse. Tyson's real record was W0 L6. Nash out.