Why So Much Hate For Lomachenko?

[VG_Addict]

A better question would be: Why so much praise for Loma? The guy aint accomplished ****. His career is medicore. He's got losses to Salido and Teo. Yet... his fans compare him to Floyd Mayweather? Yeah lets not forgot about the period where his fanboys were saying he'd beat Floyd. The fact is I've never seen a fighter get so much praise for accomplishing so little.

Tying the record for fewest number of pro fights to win a world title and holding the record of the fewest number of pro fights to become a three weight champion means he "ain't accomplished ****".

Yeah, OK.

[Goldie]

Tying the record for fewest number of pro fights to win a world title and holding the record of the fewest number of pro fights to become a three weight champion means he "ain't accomplished ****".

Yeah, OK.

The fact that he even got those opportunities so fast in his career was a privilege in and of itself. Especially when he lost his 2nd fight. He loses his 2nd pro fight to a journeyman then immediately gets a shot at a vacant title in his 3rd fight. You’re just proving the point that he’s had preferential treatment for his whole career. 16-2 and his best wins were against smaller guys.

[Goldie]

Yep thanks, so what I said about that creepy nonce please consider it as being said directly to you too.

You didn’t just talk about one person, you talked about people of a specific race. You’re just too much of a cowardly pussC to do it directly.

[VG_Addict]

The fact that he even got those opportunities so fast in his career was a privilege in and of itself. Especially when he lost his 2nd fight. He loses his 2nd pro fight to a journeyman then immediately gets a shot at a vacant title in his 3rd fight. You’re just proving the point that he’s had preferential treatment for his whole career. 16-2 and his best wins were against smaller guys.

He got the opportunity to fight for a title in his 2nd fight because he was a standout amateur.

[Goldie]

He got the opportunity to fight for a title in his 2nd fight because he was a standout amateur.

Yea, because he’s been the one and only “stand out amateur”. Lol

Amateur boxing isn’t even the same sport as professional prize fighting. He was given those fights because he had a systematically backed hype train behind him from day one.

[PistolPat]

Say what you want about Campbell, but Garcia is no joke. And I'll tell you why: I thought some of Garcia's KO's were setups at one point because it appeared that guys were dropping after not even being hit. They had to slow that **** down for me to actually see that he hit the guy (usually with his left hook) for me to realize he has devastating KO power. He might have the strongest punches in the game. He has the best left hook in at lightweight, Lopez included. If Garcia can get his head on straight, he has a very promising career. He needs to fix a few things before moving up to other weight classes.

And you can never **** on Linares. That guy is one of the most skilled boxers in the game. That Haney fight was really close, and he had Haney trying to have sex with him in the middle of the ring. That's how bad Haney was. I've never seen a boxer charge another boxer and tackle him just so he can be up next to him. **** was unreal and Haney should have been docked a point for repeated and flagrant leg humping.

Linares is my guy. Everyone believed he'd go very far, and if it weren't for some bad decisions (two corrupt ones occurring in Mexico) and his propensity for cutting, he would have a much different record than he does now.

Is Loma an ATG? Well, his career is not over yet, so we have to see. But before Duran beat Barkley, he was losing to Wilfredo Benitez and a whole host of other boxers as he moved up in weight. So cut the **** man. You don't know what you're talking about when you say this crap.

Two corrupt ones in Mexico? Are you serious? One lost was in Japan.

This got stopped on cuts, if it didn't he would have gotten knocked out badly.

Linares gets clipped and his out. That simple, and even crude punchers can still land on him because he doesn't have elite defense to hide his weakness. Uchiyama was like the GGG of 130, Linares got knocked out by Salgado and couldn't get to him. Had Linares beaten Salgado he would have gotten brutally knocked out by Uchiyama.

He flew over to the UK to fight for a belt after back to back losses (trinity with Crolla, Campbell and himself). Had Linares dared to rematch the opponents that took him out early it would have been another brutal KO and the end of his career as well as earnings. Gamboa would have beaten the snot out of him back then, he was an absolute beast.

Cano knock out was obvious to anyone following his career. Duran would lay out Linares in 1 round and you know it. Duran was at 154 and way out of his natural weight division and Wilfredo Benitez is one of the best defensive fighters all of time, in a different league to Linares. Kirkland and Sims were bad losses but when compared to Linares's losses age, weight big difference. Linares can't dare to be great like Duran, he has to stay in his lane and swerve opponents to showcase his ability and hide his weakness.

Broner was right in the phone booth with DeMarco, made Broner look absolutely elite. One sided beat down whilst barely getting touch.

[The Big Dunn]

I just saw a video on Youtube from "BoxingEgo." That guy is pretty toxic. There are three people this guy hates on like none other. Anthony Joshua, Teofimo Lopez and Vasyl Lomachenko.

I looked at the comment section, and this guys fans are filling the comments with hate comments about Lomachenko. It's unreal the level of hate I see on this guy's channel. I don't get how this guy is so popular either. He's like in the witness protection program; never see this guy without sunglasses. He's in his parents' basement, broadcasting hate speech to thousands of people. His hand movements when he talks make me think he's suspect.

Anyway, this is one person I'd love to see disappear from the Internet. He's just a toxic force, changing narratives to suit his twisted agenda. But what I don't understand is the level of hate this guy spews toward these three boxers, especially Lomachenko. Especially Lomachenko.

Thoughts?

What you are doing here is part of disgusting anti black trend where black websites, shows and posters are deemed racist whenever they don’t like a boxer that isn’t black. This isn’t done by you or anyone else when the sites are not black owned.

Now maybe this wasn’t your intent, but when you single out Loma, the only white boxer, from a group of 3 that he doesn’t like, you are virtual signaling to the portion of his fan base that you know like him primarily because he is white.

Why are you doing it this way? That seems very agenda driven.

I don’t go to this site. why is it a problem if he doesn’t like AJ, Teo or Loma? Only with black fans, websites and posters is there blowback when we are open about not liking a particular boxer.

You have made many threads. None about non blacks not liking black boxers. This thread topic has been a recurring theme in many of your posts.

Can you please explain why?

[The Big Dunn]

What I'm concerned about is that there are so many people jumping on this narrative. It causes division in the sport of boxing, when we don't need anymore. He made a video today about "double standards," how no one criticized Beterbiev for missing weight and everyone criticized Tank. But I think Beterbiev is getting criticism. But the difference is that Tank is a celebrity and Beterbiev isn't, so Tank will always get more press, regardless of whether it's positive or negative. Nobody except boxing fans know who Beterbiev is, so the media won't cover it as much. This **** is obvious.

I don't know man. I'd like to see boxing be more inclusive, where everyone comes together for the sport rather than being pushed into their different corners. It bugs me.

Dude this is complete and utter bullshit. Division is caused by threads like this where you rant against this dude for not liking 3 guys from different nationalities, countries and of different races, and then you single out the white boxer and virtual signal to other white posters.

If this truly and honestly bugs you, and you really want to see the sport come together then just one time sincerely criticize the racism you see from non black sites or posters instead of what you did here where you justify Tank getting more heat because he is a celebrity when in other threads you’ve suggested he isn’t a big draw not a star.

Missing weight isn’t something talked about outside the sport that much so celebrity stays has no bearing on volume. You absolutely know this so for you to post otherwise shows this thread is agenda driven and disingenuous.

What it seems like you really want is anyone you think is black to like Loma and not criticize him. Be a man and just say that.

The question becomes why? Why must Loma be liked by everyone?

When you do it this way you look really bad.

[MeanestNiceGuy]

Because Lomachenko's the REAL deal at 135 while "fans" hope and troll their guy into the top spot. Loma's put in the work and proven himself....kinda hard to say that about the current Lightweights. Teo couldn't even successfully defend his titles and the other guys are too afraid to be great unless it's strictly on their terms.

[Cypocryphy]

Two corrupt ones in Mexico? Are you serious? One lost was in Japan.

This got stopped on cuts, if it didn't he would have gotten knocked out badly.

Linares gets clipped and his out. That simple, and even crude punchers can still land on him because he doesn't have elite defense to hide his weakness. Uchiyama was like the GGG of 130, Linares got knocked out by Salgado and couldn't get to him. Had Linares beaten Salgado he would have gotten brutally knocked out by Uchiyama.

He flew over to the UK to fight for a belt after back to back losses (trinity with Crolla, Campbell and himself). Had Linares dared to rematch the opponents that took him out early it would have been another brutal KO and the end of his career as well as earnings. Gamboa would have beaten the snot out of him back then, he was an absolute beast.

Nope. You are wrong. Linares would have schooled all of them, easily. He was a changed man once he paired with Ismael Salas. Once he was with him, he couldn't lose. He outboxed everyone. Even Emanuel Steward said he was one of the most incredible boxers he had ever seen. Near perfect. Coming from Steward, that means everything.

Cano knock out was obvious to anyone following his career. Duran would lay out Linares in 1 round and you know it. Duran was at 154 and way out of his natural weight division and Wilfredo Benitez is one of the best defensive fighters all of time, in a different league to Linares. Kirkland and Sims were bad losses but when compared to Linares's losses age, weight big difference. Linares can't dare to be great like Duran, he has to stay in his lane and swerve opponents to showcase his ability and hide his weakness.

Broner was right in the phone booth with DeMarco, made Broner look absolutely elite. One sided beat down whilst barely getting touch.

No. That fight with Broner was simply DeMarco at the tail end of a downward trajectory. He wasn't the boxer he had been before. Then, on top of that, you had Broner at his peak, putting on the performance of his career. So that is the why for that and has no reflection on Linares. In fact, Linares was having a perfect fight until the cut on the bride of his nose and eye. Not only did that happen, but he had the worst cut man in the history of boxing in his corner that night. (Well, maybe Beterbiev's cut man from the other night was worse.) His cut man kept forgetting his gear, and then when he had it, he'd drop the q-tips. **** was unreal. And that was a fluke with Cano. It also happened to occur once he left Salas and took his training into his own hands. That was Linares' worst mistake. But it doesn't change the fact that he's one of the best three-division champs to fight in the squared circle.