Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: The Reality Is That The 'Franchise' Designation Has Given Lightweight Unbelievable Activity

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Why would you want someone to skip a mandatory when they have lean way of voluntary title defenses ? They also have the abilities to vote and skip a mandatory if a special circumstance arises so this is all just ****** and more ways to protect a certain champion to avoid a possible loss to another deserving opponent .

    Comment


    • #42
      Can anyone apply to be a franchise champion?
      why haven’t other WBC tried this?

      Comment


      • #43
        I'd call him a snake, but it would be a disservice to snakes.

        What a slimy, crooked arse pustule.

        Comment


        • #44
          Mauricio Sulaiman, 50-100 years from now will be remembered as a sh/t stain on the sport of boxing. A stain so bad that not even Oxi clean can remove it.

          Boxing has moved so far away from the 1-belt era. Even though I was not around, I could imagine boxing probably looked like a totally different sport, different environment, different discussions were had.

          This new sport, where there are multiple “champions” in a weight class, and double the amount of weight classes, it’s awful. The action, when it’s good, it’s good. But good god, when it’s bad, it is really fcking bad. Fcking ****.

          Boxers who would likely not be champion in a 1-belt era, are champions today. Mandatory fights between elites vs complete journeymen no hopers who somehow made it to #1 contender. Lastly, you have fighters with 0 wins over top 10 ranked fighters, getting a mando shot at the champion. I am talking about Lomachenko being forced to fight Haney, who had 0 fcking wins over good fighters. And Canelo needing to fight Yildirim. Then you have the WBC changing rules on the fly to make fights look bigger.

          I am so shocked that these things are still happening, all this corruption. I guess so much money is involved that no one with the power to do something, will do anything.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post

            Mauricio, and the WBC, have repeatedly said Kambosos is the undisputed champion.
            Claims Kambosos is undisputed. Then claims Haney is champion. He's having it both ways. And claiming they've done a good thing for the division.

            He had a perfect opportunity to clarify that Franchise is the 'Super' belt (as you claim) and he didn't.

            Maybe just maybe, the published rules, their press releases, and Mauricio's own comments support that you're wrong? As opposed to your view which is supported by absolutely no evidence.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Toffee View Post
              Claims Kambosos is undisputed. Then claims Haney is champion. He's having it both ways.
              Just like the WBA has done for decades. Kambosos is undisputed and Tank is champion. They're having it both ways. The WBC likely got jealous after watching the WBA get away with it for 20 years, so they started doing it too. Now that the WBA is going to stop, I'm sure the WBC will stop as well. Until then though, Kambosos is still undisputed champion.


              He had a perfect opportunity to clarify that Franchise is the 'Super' belt (as you claim) and he didn't.
              Probably because he knows the Franchise world championship is going to have to go away when the WBA's Super world championship goes away.


              Maybe just maybe, the published rules, their press releases, and Mauricio's own comments support that you're wrong? As opposed to your view which is supported by absolutely no evidence.
              The WBC's press releases and own comments support that Kambosos is undisputed champion. The published WBC official ratings list the Franchise championship above the regular championship. None of the organizations are dis*****g that Kambosos is champion, therefore he's undisputed champion.

              Comment


              • #47
                WBC WBA IBF I won't keep quoting you.

                I'll just leave this herehttps://wbcboxing.com/en/championsratings/

                And they didn't 'introduce' their own version of Super. They were very clear about what they were introducing.

                An honorary designation. Which they then made transferable upon request. But they never made it their 'Super' belt. Not in the rules, not on their website, and not when specifically asked about it by the media. Apparently it's only you that knows it's been changed. Maybe you should tell Mauricio.
                Marchegiano Marchegiano likes this.

                Comment


                • #48
                  That's a fair point actually.

                  Loma didn't really set LW on fire

                  Teo didn't do ****

                  George ain't done ****

                  Haney being emailed a title is the most talked about **** in the division since it happened. Those names, including his own, got a huge boast from folks talking about what is really the F vs WBC debate while using their names to make points.

                  To be honest, like it or not, WBC-F made LW way more focused on than it had been and the names involved all got free publicity from it.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Toffee View Post
                    WBC WBA IBF I won't keep quoting you.

                    I'll just leave this herehttps://wbcboxing.com/en/championsratings/

                    And they didn't 'introduce' their own version of Super. They were very clear about what they were introducing.

                    An honorary designation. Which they then made transferable upon request. But they never made it their 'Super' belt. Not in the rules, not on their website, and not when specifically asked about it by the media. Apparently it's only you that knows it's been changed. Maybe you should tell Mauricio.
                    I mean, that's what you have to do. Dude's here for propaganda not so much to have a conversation.

                    I had to walk away from fella when he cried about WBC champions being recognized where there is no WBC-F champion then brought up an F who is only recognized because there was no WBC champion. Hmm, when they get inconsistent like that, **** it. Give 'em what he wants to hear and let him be a dumb****.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Toffee View Post
                      WBC WBA IBF I won't keep quoting you.

                      I'll just leave this herehttps://wbcboxing.com/en/championsratings/

                      And they didn't 'introduce' their own version of Super. They were very clear about what they were introducing.

                      An honorary designation. Which they then made transferable upon request. But they never made it their 'Super' belt. Not in the rules, not on their website, and not when specifically asked about it by the media. Apparently it's only you that knows it's been changed. Maybe you should tell Mauricio.
                      I have shown you the official ratings over and over. Which clearly show "Franchise Champion" listed above "Champion."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP