Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can anyone name Furys top 5 opponents for me?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by thetruthteller View Post

    That makes it even worse. If the division has no depths, and Fury STILL hasn't fought most of the guys in it, he's even worse than we thought he is. And if the division is so bad, then clean it out. go down the line fighting every guy and beating him until there is no one left. That's what champions of the past did.
    Nonsense… nobody cares about how many lower tier guys you fought, you just need to beat the best. Fury has Klitschko, undefeated in a decade, 18 defences and Wilder 41-0, 10 defences on the resume. If he adds Usyk or AJ if he wins the rematch to that resume, do you really think people will care he missed guys like Povetkin, Ortiz, Pulev, Whyte etc?

    It’s clearly obvious you have an agenda man.
    Brumsongs1 Brumsongs1 likes this.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post

      I second that. And IMO Ortiz from maybe 2-3 years ago is EASILY a 50/50 fight with ruiz.

      AJ got some dumb ass fans.
      Bro them and Canelo fans are the worst!!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by TMLT87 View Post

        What tier do Wallin and Schwarz belong in?
        Wallin beat Breazeale. And was ducked by Whyte. So that's pretty good.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post

          Yeah but you aren't comparing him to AJ. Get out of here with your dumb little tactics.

          You backed the wrong horse. Keep backing him and keep lying to yourself, you bum.

          AJ fought a bunch of cherry picked old men, at home. Wow what a tough stretch
          Again, wasnt comparing him to AJ. You're fanboying hard if mere criticism of Furys thin resume gets you talking about Joshua.

          But yeah, Joshua does have more depth of solid wins to his resume, while Fury has the better top end wins. Thats objective reality. Now lets see Fury stick around and defend those belts consistently against a range of top 10 level opponents, no excuses.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by TMLT87 View Post

            Again, wasnt comparing him to AJ. You're fanboying hard if mere criticism of Furys thin resume gets you talking about Joshua.

            But yeah, Joshua does have more depth of solid wins to his resume, while Fury has the better top end wins. Thats objective reality. Now lets see Fury stick around and defend those belts consistently against a range of top 10 level opponents, no excuses.
            You just compared him to AJ, again. You're a weird guy.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post

              He fought Wilder 3 times. That's 3 more times than AJ would have fought him. He is officially 2-0-1 in those fights. AJ would be lucky to be 1-0-2 in those fights.
              AJ would have badly knocked Wilder out twice and moved on . Fury only fought Wilder 3 times for 2 reasons . The first is because there was an official draw and the second reason is Fury picked Wilder over AJ because it was the easier fight .
              Last edited by REDEEMER; 12-09-2021, 01:12 PM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by TMLT87 View Post

                What tier do Wallin and Schwarz belong in?
                Schwarz isn't even boxing any more. Nor is Pianeta or Seferi. And Fury fought them all within the last couple of fights. Imagine if it was AJ fighting these stiffs. The boxing public would never let him hear the end of it. Yet Fury gets a pass?

                Comment


                • #38
                  I'm not a Fury guy, but who is better than him right now at heavyweight? Who is more proven?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

                    Nonsense… nobody cares about how many lower tier guys you fought, you just need to beat the best. Fury has Klitschko, undefeated in a decade, 18 defences and Wilder 41-0, 10 defences on the resume.
                    So nobody cares about how many lower tier guys someone fights, but then in the next sentence you're hyping up Wilder being 41-0 and "the best" by virtue of beating a bunch of guys that were almost entirely lower tier than the names you're calling lower tier.

                    And Wlad lost his next fight and retired.

                    Originally posted by thetruthteller View Post

                    Schwarz isn't even boxing any more. Nor is Pianeta or Seferi. And Fury fought them all within the last couple of fights. Imagine if it was AJ fighting these stiffs. The boxing public would never let him hear the end of it. Yet Fury gets a pass?
                    This is why I dont get the whole excusing Fury not fighting people. "oh its not worth him fighting Whyte, Joyce, Joshua, Sanchez etc etc because hes fought the best" but apparently its worth getting in there with Tom Schwarz.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post

                      Wallin beat Breazeale. And was ducked by Whyte. So that's pretty good.
                      Here’s another wrong post .

                      Whyte didn’t duck him ,how do you duck a guy that you offered a fight to ?

                      Wallin first step up fight was actually Fury ,had Wallin fought Breazeale first he may have defeated Fury because he didn’t have that experience when he fought Fury . At the end of the day Fury fought Wallin before he had any step up fights ,he doesn’t get credit for whoever Wallin defeats . A rematch would be much more dangerous for Fury then the initial fight .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP