Can anyone name Furys top 5 opponents for me?

[Boxing-1013]

Wlad, Wilder, Del Boy...erm...Kevin Johnson? USS? Wallin?



Theres like 10+ HWs around right now who would be in the top 3 best guys hes faced in his 30+ fight, 13 year career.

He fought Wilder 3 times. That's 3 more times than AJ would have fought him. He is officially 2-0-1 in those fights. AJ would be lucky to be 1-0-2 in those fights.

[Boxing-1013]

Obviously you have to list Wlad, Wilder x3, and then it's probably Wallin.

His top 4 fights is way superior to anyone at HW currently. Not even close.

[thetruthteller]

Wow. The justifications for some of Fury's wins are laughable. Klitschko was 39 and that fight was the worst eyesore of a fight that any of us have seen. The Wilder fights were respectable, but how much credit does one get for beating a guy twice but facing no one else within that same time frame? Wallin's claim to fame is that he went the distance with Fury and loss. Almost getting a cuts stoppage. That doesn't make him great, that just makes his a good loser. Cunningham was a decent cruiser but a terrible heavyweight and he floored Fury in round 2. And Chisora??? He has 11 losses on his record. And counting. Of the current top 10 Fury has fought 2. And again, one of them is 11 loss Chisora. Heavyweights ranked 11 through 20 he has fought 1. Wallin. Who's claim to fame is losing and going 12 rounds. 20 through 30 he has fought Hammer. Who has 8 losses. From 30 to 50 he has fought none. So in all, Fury has fought 4 guys out of the current top 30. Two of which have a combined 19 losses on their records. He has avoided all the rest of the best heavyweights out there yet he is somehow the best we have???

[tonysoprano]

He fought Wilder 3 times. That's 3 more times than AJ would have fought him. He is officially 2-0-1 in those fights. AJ would be lucky to be 1-0-2 in those fights.

Wilder ducked AJ and turned down 100M so he could cherry pick a fat, out of shape Fury. It backfired and he had no choice to take a rematch.

Wilders team wanted nothing to do with AJ and rightly so because they know Wilder is a bum-killing garbage fighter who would have got KTFO by the first semi-decent HW he got in with. Which is what happened.

[thetruthteller]

The division has no depth. His win’s over Klitschko Wilder surpass what any other HW have on their resume. The only other name Fury needs is Usyk at the moment.

That makes it even worse. If the division has no depths, and Fury STILL hasn't fought most of the guys in it, he's even worse than we thought he is. And if the division is so bad, then clean it out. go down the line fighting every guy and beating him until there is no one left. That's what champions of the past did.

[thetruthteller]

Yeah, they pretend Wallin is worse than Pulev alike guys, but there is a reason Whyte ducked Wallin.

The reason Whyte "ducked" Wallin, was because he wanted to fight for unification. Explain how that is different than Fury wanting to duck Whyte for unification?

[thetruthteller]

Wlad
Wilder x2 (really should be x3)
Chisora x2

Yeah I struggle to name 5 good opponents Fury has faced. Horsehiiiiiet resume

Yep. Which is my point. Shouldn't he have to have beaten most if not SOME of the best heavyweights out there to be considered the best?

[TernceBudCharlo]

Wilder is the only difference between the resumes, both beat Fury, and Whyte, Parker, Ruiz, Povetkin are all better wins than Chisora.

[Boxing-1013]

Wilder ducked AJ and turned down 100M so he could cherry pick a fat, out of shape Fury. It backfired and he had no choice to take a rematch.

Wilders team wanted nothing to do with AJ and rightly so because they know Wilder is a bum-killing garbage fighter who would have got KTFO by the first semi-decent HW he got in with. Which is what happened.

Lol....whatever you have to tell yourself, bud. AJ got KOed by Ruiz, I'd slow down on the hype train for him if I were you.

[Boxing-1013]

Wow. The justifications for some of Fury's wins are laughable. Klitschko was 39 and that fight was the worst eyesore of a fight that any of us have seen. The Wilder fights were respectable, but how much credit does one get for beating a guy twice but facing no one else within that same time frame? Wallin's claim to fame is that he went the distance with Fury and loss. Almost getting a cuts stoppage. That doesn't make him great, that just makes his a good loser. Cunningham was a decent cruiser but a terrible heavyweight and he floored Fury in round 2. And Chisora??? He has 11 losses on his record. And counting. Of the current top 10 Fury has fought 2. And again, one of them is 11 loss Chisora. Heavyweights ranked 11 through 20 he has fought 1. Wallin. Who's claim to fame is losing and going 12 rounds. 20 through 30 he has fought Hammer. Who has 8 losses. From 30 to 50 he has fought none. So in all, Fury has fought 4 guys out of the current top 30. Two of which have a combined 19 losses on their records. He has avoided all the rest of the best heavyweights out there yet he is somehow the best we have???

Wallin beat Breazeale. Don't leave that out you little POS