Why is CRAWFORD Held to Low Standards, not facing Hard Punchers whilst moving Up?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thuglife Nelo
    Banned
    • Dec 2018
    • 26836
    • 1,299
    • 1,822
    • 654,176

    #31
    Originally posted by TernceBudCharlo

    He beat Trout controversially, there are many who scored the fight for Trout. Wins with controversy don't help your resume the way wins without controversy do. No matter what the scorecrads said, Canelo was unable to prove that he was clearly the better fighter than Trout, Lara, and GGG. How can you rank Canelo #1 on the p4p list when there are 3 fighters out there that we know are as good as Canelo?
    Crawford doesn’t fight slicksters, only the HNIC Canelo does that. Crawford said Hank Lundy was the most slick boxer he ever faced, pulling up a midget from a lower class too

    Comment

    • Thuglife Nelo
      Banned
      • Dec 2018
      • 26836
      • 1,299
      • 1,822
      • 654,176

      #32
      Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet

      That was a green Canelo, and he beat Trout.

      It's a shame than Canelo at 23 years old had a better win than Crawford at his 34.

      Lol
      Canelo was 22 when he fought Trout. He was 23 when he fought Floyd and Lara

      Comment

      • Thuglife Nelo
        Banned
        • Dec 2018
        • 26836
        • 1,299
        • 1,822
        • 654,176

        #33
        Originally posted by TernceBudCharlo

        Nope, same old canelo, still can't deal ...
        Crawford waited hour long seconds just to wait for Porter to attack. Most had it close until Bud rocked him. Not much activity in Bud vs Porter because they were afraid to fight until the second half.

        Canelo on the other hand, stopped “movers” in BJS and Plant.

        but we know you’re trolling. it’s bliss that Canelo is #1 P4P reppin the sport propah!

        Comment

        • Fists_of_Fury
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2006
          • 7366
          • 2,351
          • 12,608
          • 58,085

          #34
          Originally posted by TernceBudCharlo

          Wrong, it was a close fight until the 5th round, with Gamboa definitely edging a few, which Crawford came back to win in dominant fashion. Do not forget Gamboa is an elite olympic gold medalist, a very skilled and slick fighter, exactly the type of fighter that Canelo still has nightmares over to this day and will not ever fight. We already know if Gamboa was in Canelo's weight class he woulda ducked him same way he ducked the Lara rematch and continues to duck Andrade and charlo. CRAWFORD RUN TOWARD THE SMOKE CANELO RUN AWAY FROM IT.
          A guy that got dropped tons is slick?

          Comment

          • champion4ever
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 23918
            • 4,090
            • 7,167
            • 202,915,785

            #35
            Originally posted by LarryX....

            Canelo literally just unified 168..wtf are you talking about?
            Yes, by avoiding the best fighter in that division which was David Benavidez. The only reason why he became the undisputed Super middleweight champion was because Benavidez was not the current WBC titleholder at the 168 lbs weight division at the time. That title had become vacant.

            If you don't believe me then ask Teddy Atlas, Antonio Tarver, Mike Tyson and Timothy Bradley. No better yet ask the dude that you claim to ride so hard for and that is none other than Floyd Money Mayweather, Jr.

            They have all reached the same conclusion as I have and that is Canelo had cherrypicked his way to the undisputed crown at 168 by avoiding the best level of opposition. Now a name a fighter that Crawford has ducked en route to his undisputed crown at 140. You can't because it doesn't
            exist.

            Floyd Money Mayweather, Jr has already crowned Terence Crawford as the best #1 P4P fighter in the world today. So I really don't understand your argument.

            Comment

            • champion4ever
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 23918
              • 4,090
              • 7,167
              • 202,915,785

              #36
              Originally posted by Thuglife Nelo

              Canelo was 22 when he fought Trout. He was 23 when he fought Floyd and Lara
              Yes, he was 22 and 23 years old when he challenged both Trout and Mayweather. However, you've conveniently left off the fact that he had 42 and 43 professional prizefights at the time as well when he fought those guys..So green my ass! He had just as much ring experience as Mayweather with his 44 fights and more ring experience than Austin Trout with his 26 fights.

              Comment

              • champion4ever
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2007
                • 23918
                • 4,090
                • 7,167
                • 202,915,785

                #37
                Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet

                Stop.

                Canelo unified ane cleanes 154, 160 and 168.

                154: Lara, Floyd, Trout.

                160: Jacobs, Golovkin

                168: Smith, Saunders, Caleb,

                Kovalev in 175 is like Crawford beating and old Golovkin.

                Stop, Canelo is better fighter and more proven than your boy.
                You really disappoint me Frankie. You really have. You know darn well that the only division that Canelo has ever unified the crown was at 168 because he ducked the best fighter in that division which was David Benavidez.

                Comment

                • champion4ever
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 23918
                  • 4,090
                  • 7,167
                  • 202,915,785

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet

                  Canelo win against Trout is better than the Best win of this 34 years old Crawford.

                  I mean, Best win of Porter is Danny García, Best win of Trout is Cotto.
                  I disagree. Austin Trout lacked several big names on his resume at the time he fought Alvarez. The only name he fought was Miguel Cotto.. Trout was just your typical 154lbs titleholder.

                  Comment

                  • Thuglife Nelo
                    Banned
                    • Dec 2018
                    • 26836
                    • 1,299
                    • 1,822
                    • 654,176

                    #39
                    Originally posted by champion4ever
                    Yes, he was 22 and 23 years old when he challenged both Trout and Mayweather. However, you've conveniently left off the fact that he had 42 and 43 professional prizefights at the time as well when he fought those guys..So green my ass! He had just as much ring experience as Mayweather with his 44 fights and more ring experience than Austin Trout with his 26 fights.
                    Because he started at 15. Was also in the juniors Mexican Olympic team without an extensive amateur career. And most importantly, he didn’t slang rocksz

                    Comment

                    • champion4ever
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2007
                      • 23918
                      • 4,090
                      • 7,167
                      • 202,915,785

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Thuglife Nelo

                      Because he started at 15. Was also in the juniors Mexican Olympic team without an extensive amateur career. And most importantly, he didn’t slang rocksz
                      Rumors have it that he's done a whole lot worse than just slangin rocksz. So what hood are you from? Why am i even asking you this question? You ain't from no fucking hood. You are probably from the San Fernando Valley portion of Los Angeles.
                      Last edited by champion4ever; 11-27-2021, 11:15 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP