Both are undisputed but Usyk cleared out a much stronger division. Both are equally as skilled (both have their flaws and weaknesses). Usyk does seem to have the better resume. What do you guys say?
Who ranks higher P4P? Crawford or Usyk
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Very similar resumes and accomplishments but I give Bud the edge because he's never had that moment where he looked vulernaable or as if the outcome of a fight was in doubtt. Now I did think Usyk beat Brediesi but don't forget that was a very close fight that some people had 6-6. And I did not think Usyk looked good against Chisora at all. -
chisora and usyk would ko bum crawford and you know itVery similar resumes and accomplishments but I give Bud the edge because he's never had that moment where he looked vulernaable or as if the outcome of a fight was in doubtt. Now I did think Usyk beat Brediesi but don't forget that was a very close fight that some people had 6-6. And I did not think Usyk looked good against Chisora at all.Comment
-
Comment
-
Similar accomplishments but for me Usyk has a much better resume and he beat them all on the opponents home turf and fought them more or less all back-to-back in a short span. Bud has fought way too much garbage in between Postol and Porter neither of which are truly elite.Comment
-
Are you really saying that Postol and Porter aren't on Bredies or AJ level? Those are Usyk's 2 best wins. Bellew elite? Stop it. Bellew, Gassiev, Chisora, Glowacki, all on the same level or even worse than Gamboa, Burns, Beltran, Felix Diaz, Horn, Benavidez, even washed Brook and Khan are better than those guys.Similar accomplishments but for me Usyk has a much better resume and he beat them all on the opponents home turf and fought them more or less all back-to-back in a short span. Bud has fought way too much garbage in between Postol and Porter neither of which are truly elite.Comment
-
I can't understand why people say Bud's resume is garbage, Brook, Kavaluskis, Khan, Horn, Indongo, Diaz, Dulorme, Burns, Gamboa are all very good fighters. They aren't the bums you make them out to be it's just hate to say they are.Comment
-
Hard to say, Usyk is fighting men that outweigh him by 20-30lbs. Bud is really good and may be the best from 140-154 I just dont know if he is the best in the world. I dont know If Usyk is either though. Im ok with saying they are among a hand full of the best in the world.Comment
-
Are you really saying that Postol and Porter aren't on Bredies or AJ level? Those are Usyk's 2 best wins. Bellew elite? Stop it. Bellew, Gassiev, Chisora, Glowacki, all on the same level or even worse than Gamboa, Burns, Beltran, Felix Diaz, Horn, Benavidez, even washed Brook and Khan are better than those guys.
No way near they've lost everytime they have stepped up apart from Postol beating Matthysse. Porter could easily have 7-8 losses. Sure they're both better than Chisora & Glowacki but that is about as far as I'd go.
I'd say Hunter was a better win than Chisora and Glowacki the latter whom I really don't rate tbh, maybe even Mchunu (similar level to Porter imo).
Gamboa was moving up two weights, the rest are journeyman with no stand out wins or were totally shot. Briedis and Gassiev were both undefeated, elite CWs with recent quality wins and bags of K.O power something none of these guys really have.
Comment
-
Comment
Comment