Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: Not For Me To Decide If I'm Number One Pound-For-Pound Or Canelo

[Cyborg Fangerloo]

Fight a few top fighters then think about being #1. Just do it. Fight a few top fighters. Do it. I dare you.

[Oregonian]

How boxing scene has Spence over Crawford is beyond me. I wont get into who's better between Canelo and Crawford but Spence has been at 147 his whole career and arguably inferior to Crawford IMO and I'm a Spence fan

———-
Are you talking career-wise to date or at WW? If the focus is WW, then Crawford’s resume is garbage. Sure he beat Porter & only a casual can be dismissive of it, but does it elevate him to another level? I don’t think so.
Spence’s resume at WW isn’t much better but at least he beat a list of credible guys after traveling to England to beat Brook who beat Porter years ago if I might add.
Crawford’s hit list includes two guys that Spence already beat as well as guys like Khan.

I’m not saying either is better than the other, just saying Crawford’s resume isn’t stacked at all. Crawford is 34 and the Spence fight can still be made BUT he needs to stop with the posturing and call out Spence every time he’s meeting with the media.
Spence should do the same

[kingstip9]

Definitely not number one

[billeau2]

Arguing who the pound for pound #1 is like arguing how many angels are on the head of a pin.

[Mexican_Puppet]

Skills mean nothing when you don't put those skills against top competition, anyone can look flashy against inferior competition. Porter no doubt was a solid win, it would of been a better win if Crawford would of fought him and beat him 3 years ago when he moved up to WW, not beat him at the end of his game were Porter was obviously shop worn. Crawford is not going to beat Ennis, or Ortiz, and will probably steer far away from those 2, Ugas he might beat, if you think he can go up to 154 and beat Castaño or Charlo, my friend, give me some of whatever you're smoking......

thay guy don't know about boxing

He said Plant would school Canelo

[Mexican_Puppet]

Crawford,.nobody in the world, except some black boxing fans, say You are #1.

You are not better than Canelo or Usyk.


You are 34 years old and your Best win is a Porter.

Thats puré garbabe

[Mexican_Puppet]

usyk number 1 for me. crawford is above canelo for sure tho now, way above.

You don't know about boxing
and You are a confirmed hater than Canelo.


Trout was a better win than this Spence..


You are a hater, all thw world knows canelo is #1.

Del with it

[Get em up]

———-
Are you talking career-wise to date or at WW? If the focus is WW, then Crawford’s resume is garbage. Sure he beat Porter & only a casual can be dismissive of it, but does it elevate him to another level? I don’t think so.
Spence’s resume at WW isn’t much better but at least he beat a list of credible guys after traveling to England to beat Brook who beat Porter years ago if I might add.
Crawford’s hit list includes two guys that Spence already beat as well as guys like Khan.

I’m not saying either is better than the other, just saying Crawford’s resume isn’t stacked at all. Crawford is 34 and the Spence fight can still be made BUT he needs to stop with the posturing and call out Spence every time he’s meeting with the media.
Spence should do the same

I agree they should both be screaming to the mountain tops to fight each other. Spence shouldve climbed in the ring last Saturday and called Bud out and Bud should be at every Spence fight doing the same. Both guys need each other now more than ever.

[Pac=Duran]

Even if he beat Spence he wouldn’t be number 1 tbh.

he’s not number 2 anyway. Usyk has done far more, much better opposition.

[hugh grant]

Your not no1 or 2. Skill wise and ability wise you might be but not resume wise and with your don't need spence attitude you won't overtake usyk anytime soon