At this stage, isn’t CHARLO vs ANDRADE more competitive than SPENCE vs CRAWFORD?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thuglife Nelo
    Banned
    • Dec 2018
    • 26836
    • 1,299
    • 1,822
    • 654,176

    #1

    At this stage, isn’t CHARLO vs ANDRADE more competitive than SPENCE vs CRAWFORD?

    They’re all Undefeated. There’s still uncertainty with Spence from that car crash…

  • famicommander
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2018
    • 10628
    • 5,781
    • 1
    • 49,546

    #2
    Charlo has 2 wins over legit titlists: Cornelius Bundradge and Julian Williams.

    Andrade has 0 decent wins.

    Spence has Chris Algieri, Kell Brook, Lamont Peterson, Mikey Garcia, Shawn Porter, and Danny Garcia.

    Crawford has Ricky Burns, Yuriorkis Gamboa, Rey Beltran, Viktor Postol, Julius Indongo, Jeff Horn (lol), Amir Khan, and Kell Brook.

    So no. Charlo vs Andrade is a barely tested fighter against an untested figter.

    Spence has the best resume at 147.

    Crawford's resume at 147 so far is suspect, but a win over Porter would solidify that. His resume at 135 and 140 is severely underrated; he was lineal at lightweight and undisputed/lineal at super lightweight.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP