-
-
Maybe because Fury genuinely earns more. Since being on ESPN, Furys purses are disclosed (at least their minimums) by the nevada state athletic commission. They tend to be way more forthright about boxers earnings than the are in the UK. The only evidence for Joshua's earnings is basically whatever Hearn tells you. And, in that regard, you should know better by now.Comment
-
His contract is $20m a fight, $100m for 5 fights. He doesnt get more than that except if it's through ticket sales.
This was AJ's exclusive matchroom contract before
£100m
so now you'll say 'dont believe eddie hearn' but where does aj fit into this story then? if it is false, wouldnt he hav something to say?
he's now signed a lifetime contraxct, so obv matchroom delivered for him.
£100m just from that.
he's fought povetkin, ruiz x2 and pulev, only 4 fights since then. £100m over 4 fights is better than $100m over 5 fights.
keep in mind that thisis not part of the fight purse/box office/ticket sales. matchroom pay AJ just for the privalege of promoting him and the benefits of any 20% cut they get from his fights after that.
AJ was paid seperately by dazn, but that is undisclosed.
He was paid a large cut for the sky sports box office, ticket sales and then there was the £60m from saudis. I've seen the media just willy nilly write '40m, 50m, $40m, $60m' but it was in pounds, £100m total purse. AJ took about £60m, ruiz got £12 and the rest was for eddie hearnand the card.
look, they're richer than ill ever be and it is a bit pathetic for me to be going on about the wealth of other men. It's more the way the media moves in sly little ways and no one checks them. this isnt even about tyson fury, the media has often gone against him too. it is the media just saying **** with no meaning or consequense all the time. no reality, no substance, just putting out dopey articles like 'richest men in boxing'
derp derp $400m roy jones jr' and i think 'wtf is this? they would know how?'
i know for sure AJ has earned more than $60m.
look at box office figures from sky sports alone
he's done a total of 9m ppv buys. some of them at £25 but even at £20, that's a revenue of £180m.
obv when you add up matchroom, dazn, saudis, ticket sales..it's up there.
keep in mind the article was about net worth. i know they pay a lot of taxes too...but on top of all that, AJ has big sponsorship deals too.
£100m is conservative. article said $60m, £43m. whoever types those articles should be clubbed to death imo. most of us are under pressure at work and constantly watched. these media ppl just print random **** nd its okay. club em to death, honestly. they are taking the piss.
Comment
-
Did you really write all this ****?
His contract is $20m a fight, $100m for 5 fights. He doesnt get more than that except if it's through ticket sales.
This was AJ's exclusive matchroom contract before
£100m
so now you'll say 'dont believe eddie hearn' but where does aj fit into this story then? if it is false, wouldnt he hav something to say?
he's now signed a lifetime contraxct, so obv matchroom delivered for him.
£100m just from that.
he's fought povetkin, ruiz x2 and pulev, only 4 fights since then. £100m over 4 fights is better than $100m over 5 fights.
keep in mind that thisis not part of the fight purse/box office/ticket sales. matchroom pay AJ just for the privalege of promoting him and the benefits of any 20% cut they get from his fights after that.
AJ was paid seperately by dazn, but that is undisclosed.
He was paid a large cut for the sky sports box office, ticket sales and then there was the £60m from saudis. I've seen the media just willy nilly write '40m, 50m, $40m, $60m' but it was in pounds, £100m total purse. AJ took about £60m, ruiz got £12 and the rest was for eddie hearnand the card.
look, they're richer than ill ever be and it is a bit pathetic for me to be going on about the wealth of other men. It's more the way the media moves in sly little ways and no one checks them. this isnt even about tyson fury, the media has often gone against him too. it is the media just saying **** with no meaning or consequense all the time. no reality, no substance, just putting out dopey articles like 'richest men in boxing'
derp derp $400m roy jones jr' and i think 'wtf is this? they would know how?'
i know for sure AJ has earned more than $60m.
look at box office figures from sky sports alone
he's done a total of 9m ppv buys. some of them at £25 but even at £20, that's a revenue of £180m.
obv when you add up matchroom, dazn, saudis, ticket sales..it's up there.
keep in mind the article was about net worth. i know they pay a lot of taxes too...but on top of all that, AJ has big sponsorship deals too.
£100m is conservative. article said $60m, £43m. whoever types those articles should be clubbed to death imo. most of us are under pressure at work and constantly watched. these media ppl just print random **** nd its okay. club em to death, honestly. they are taking the piss.
Joshua fans really are a special kind of sad.
Not a single thing you posted is verifiable, other than the sky box office viewing figures.
You're not really privy to any of the contractual agreements disclosed. You already know this is pathetic so why even waste your time?
The only thing that stands is, again, the novnevada athletic state commission tend to be more transparent about boxers purses due to what I believe are laws on the disclosure of mandatory minimums. But again maybe its meaningless and Fury doesn't earn that much. Who honestly gives a ****?Comment
-
Is there a date or location set for Usyk vs Joshua 2? I may try going to that fight.Comment
-
Those are the types of posts you need to ignore. If anyone is lying about earnings - it’s actually Fury.
His contract is $20m a fight, $100m for 5 fights. He doesnt get more than that except if it's through ticket sales.
This was AJ's exclusive matchroom contract before
£100m
so now you'll say 'dont believe eddie hearn' but where does aj fit into this story then? if it is false, wouldnt he hav something to say?
he's now signed a lifetime contraxct, so obv matchroom delivered for him.
£100m just from that.
he's fought povetkin, ruiz x2 and pulev, only 4 fights since then. £100m over 4 fights is better than $100m over 5 fights.
keep in mind that thisis not part of the fight purse/box office/ticket sales. matchroom pay AJ just for the privalege of promoting him and the benefits of any 20% cut they get from his fights after that.
AJ was paid seperately by dazn, but that is undisclosed.
He was paid a large cut for the sky sports box office, ticket sales and then there was the £60m from saudis. I've seen the media just willy nilly write '40m, 50m, $40m, $60m' but it was in pounds, £100m total purse. AJ took about £60m, ruiz got £12 and the rest was for eddie hearnand the card.
look, they're richer than ill ever be and it is a bit pathetic for me to be going on about the wealth of other men. It's more the way the media moves in sly little ways and no one checks them. this isnt even about tyson fury, the media has often gone against him too. it is the media just saying **** with no meaning or consequense all the time. no reality, no substance, just putting out dopey articles like 'richest men in boxing'
derp derp $400m roy jones jr' and i think 'wtf is this? they would know how?'
i know for sure AJ has earned more than $60m.
look at box office figures from sky sports alone
he's done a total of 9m ppv buys. some of them at £25 but even at £20, that's a revenue of £180m.
obv when you add up matchroom, dazn, saudis, ticket sales..it's up there.
keep in mind the article was about net worth. i know they pay a lot of taxes too...but on top of all that, AJ has big sponsorship deals too.
£100m is conservative. article said $60m, £43m. whoever types those articles should be clubbed to death imo. most of us are under pressure at work and constantly watched. these media ppl just print random **** nd its okay. club em to death, honestly. they are taking the piss.
None of Fury’s fights against Wilder and every fight he has been in, in the US has a disclose purse that’s over $8m. But somehow he claims he’s earning $20m a fight, lol.
AJ’s purses are always disclosed and that’s actually the conservative version because he makes more + sponsors + PPV.
Funny how they’re claiming AJ doesn’t make that much yet Ruiz who was paid some cheap money bought a big mansion, 2 Rolls Royces, 7 figures on ***elry and started a real estate business off one fight against AJ, lol.Comment
-
it isnt some personal issue for me..this guy thinks im being a 'fan' typing that.
my annoyance is more the way the media get to write anything they like, it's basically just fake news. These journalists who write the articles are getting to just pass off anything as news. Think about it, that's their job. if it was my job, i'd take some pride in it and do research. not just type random ****. even that article was copy/pasting from another. this is news? disgusting. peeople earning a living by just typing dumb ****.
9m ppv buys he's done in the uk. over over 3.5m of those have been @ £25 too.
£200m revenue. Ticket sales. Sponsorship deals. A matchroom contract that was public news worth £100m for 4 fights. Dazn. the Site fee....but he's only worh $60m?
how is it being a fanboy for just making sense?Comment
-
The fella is a jobless sad cu..unt.
He runs two accounts: one as a Wilder fan girl (this one) and a next one as a Fury fan girl. And both are anti-AJ. It just shows how jobless and miserable these muppets are. And it’s always the fan girls that call others fan boy - how ironic, lol.
AJ’s earnings and networth aren’t even worth arguing because his conservative net worth is public record. Just go on Company House and check the companies registered to his name and he’s worth over £150m. And that’s the conservative estimate he declared since people don’t declare everything.
Andy Ruiz made more in his 2 fights against AJ than Fury made in his first 2 fights against Wilder. And Ruiz only got paid a tiny fraction of what AJ made. Cumulatively, he made less than 10% of what AJ made.Comment
-
Tweet
Comment