Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why did Usyk agree to a rematch clause?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why did Usyk agree to a rematch clause?

    Why did the WBO mandatory have to sign a rematch clause?

  • #2
    Originally posted by kushking View Post
    Why did the WBO mandatory have to sign a rematch clause?
    Its not uncommon for the champion to have a rematch clause, its not like this is an AJ-Hearns special.

    Comment


    • #3
      Lol why wouldn't he in his position

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by anonymous2.0 View Post

        Its not uncommon for the champion to have a rematch clause, its not like this is an AJ-Hearns special.
        Its a mandatory fight that AJ was forced to take. Normally theres no rematch clause for mandatories, just look at Porter v Crawford.

        Comment


        • #5
          It made sense for him to sign one. If he wins the first fight, which he did, he then gets another massive/even bigger pay day, to beat a guy that he has already beaten. Nash out. Nash is a true warrior and a helluva poster who resides in England
          El_Mero likes this.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by KillaMane26 View Post
            Lol why wouldn't he in his position
            If Usyk didn't agree to that clause(which he can't be forced into) we'd be going straight to undisputed, instead we'll likely get another Saudi fight....

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by kushking View Post

              Its a mandatory fight that AJ was forced to take. Normally theres no rematch clause for mandatories, just look at Porter v Crawford.
              Nonsense. Rematches are more common than not unless it goes to purse bid.
              El_Mero likes this.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by kushking View Post

                If Usyk didn't agree to that clause(which he can't be forced into) we'd be going straight to undisputed, instead we'll likely get another Saudi fight....
                But it seems to be working out in his favor though don't you think?
                BustedKnuckles likes this.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by KillaMane26 View Post

                  But it seems to be working out in his favor though don't you think?
                  I think he'd have made tons more money v Fury in a undisputed

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by kushking View Post

                    If Usyk didn't agree to that clause(which he can't be forced into) we'd be going straight to undisputed, instead we'll likely get another Saudi fight....
                    It's called negotiations, if he didn't agree a purse bid would happen and nobody has control on who would win it. See Lopez-Kambosos for example. Fact is Joshua would drop the belt instead of going to purse bids because he has network deals and Usyk needed Joshua more than he needed Usyk.
                    Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 10-19-2021, 10:44 AM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP