I have just debunked the long count conspiracy

[MoneyKasha]

10 counts are never 10 seconds The question is, is the ref consistent? Both of Wilders knockdowns were 12 seconds from fall to the 8 count. It was 11 for Fury's first, and 13 for his second including the pause for Wilder leaving the neutral corner. So the ref was consistent.

even without the interruption, continuing the count from the Ref's pace...Fury would of got up at "8" anyways on the second knockdown

long count debunked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSxL..._NV9T_y96ilENO

as you all know the Ref is allowed to stop a count if a fighter is not in a neutral corner. Wilder went to his corner so the ref is allowed to stop a count and then continue off where he left of

"but but the timekeeper"


the timekeeper ceases to count once the ref picks it up, after which point the ref's count 'shall prevail and be relied upon by the boxers'... once the ref picks up the count. The timekeeper doesn't matter anymore

GAME, SET, MATCH

[NYG]

There was no conspiracy

[Smash]

yeah we have seen the ref stop counts plenty of times when guys not in the right corner and point frantically to the correct corner or even the the guy is inching his was out of the corner too quick he gives time

[YoungManRumble]

Go sit in the corner for a moment with ShaneMoselySr. and stop making so many goddamn threads

[Thuglife Nelo]

I counted 10.00000000000086775 so Fury was definitely out

[brettWall]

Bottom line is you make a big deal of it when the count doesn't favour your fighter. You don't when it does. Or vise versa. The count doesn't always start on the time you expected it to. It's always up to the ref. No way it can't be accurate.

It's a nonsensical topic. What the ref should be focusing on is excessive holding.