PAC - Floyd is gonna be similar to Glen Johnson vs RJJ/Calzaghe vs RJJ but

[The Gambler1981]

Shut your *uckin' mouth! I only brought up their similarities,now your pointing out their differences.

why are you so angry, I am not the one that was making terrible comparisons? Be mad at yourself for saying foolish things.

[Toney Loc]

James Toney and Floyd do not really fight alike even if they use a common trick. James Toney could not stay away from the buffet line, he also liked to drink and smoke cigars.

James Toney had piss poor discipline out of the ring so comparing them is not a correct comparision.

They both use the shoulder roll but that does not mean that is the only thing they did or that they really fight alike. I have watched a lot of both dudes you are over simplifying.

If you want to start name calling atleast know what the hell you are talking about in the first place.

Bingo. Floyd and Toney fight nothing alike. Shoulder roll being just about the only similarity, and even then, they use it differently.

[We want Floyd]

why are you so angry, I am not the one that was making terrible comparisons? Be mad at yourself for saying foolish things.

I said they have similarities, do you know what that word means?

It's not a flatout comparison, but a f**kin' analogy!

****-O-GY: A resemblance in some particulars between things otherwise unlike

Your right, Floyd and JT don't fight the same exact way, but, there are similarities, and w/ those similarities, is where I find PAC can capitalize!!

[The Gambler1981]

I said they have similarities, do you know what that word means?

It's not a flatout comparison, but a f**kin' analogy!

****-O-GY: A resemblance in some particulars between things otherwise unlike

Your right, Floyd and JT don't fight the same exact way, but, there are similarities, and w/ those similarities, is where I find PAC can capitalize!!

Even if there are similarities there are enough differences to really question that conclusion.

[We want Floyd]

Even if there are similarities there are enough differences to really question that conclusion.

We'll just have to wait and see

[Mr. Philadel]

I want to see how mr. boatbuyer looks against JMM first before jumping to a conclusion about how he will look against Pac.

me to.......I'm not thinkin' about Floyd-Pac right now!!!.....it might not happen if one of them lose their next fight anyways!!

[Parody]

me to.......I'm not thinkin' about Floyd-Pac right now!!!.....it might not happen if one of them lose their next fight anyways!!

Exactly, we dont even know what Mayweather-Marquez will be like as we haven't seen Mayweather in the ring for two years. Thank god Floyd is not underestimating Marquez though, Floyd is training hard for this fight and so is Marquez, and like Money said they will both give it their best but "there has to be a winner and a loser in this fight, and may the best man win."

Pacquiao-Cotto is a fight where I cant even pick a winner.

[wizard king]

i never give any excuses......never......jmm is unproven above 135...that is not an excuse ,its a fact...

your such a ****ing pac nut hugger. like pac is proven above 135 dip**** his first real test is cotto. if he beats cotto then you can open your whore mouth. pac is taylor made for floyd deal with it and pac is nothing more then a tune up for floyd. i love the fact how these nut huggers deny how jmm broght the fight to pac and how they forget floyd does the same thing jmm does but 10x better and now all sudden pac can beat floyd when pac cant even handel marquez. here ***** suck on this