Who ranks higher p4p, Manny Pacquiao or Billy Conn? Lets hear some answers!
This is a test
Collapse
-
Comment
-
i didnt vote as i dont know enough about conn too say
i do know he gave up his LHW title in 1941 too challenge joe louis without moving up in weight and was handling him and was ahead after 12 rounds even louis said so himself,got ko'd in the 13th when he went looking for the ko
he must have been pretty speialComment
-
Conn was a very good fighter who was 175lb champ and fought many names, but Manny is a better fighter. His wins over MAB, Morales, JMM (even though i thought marquez could have got the nod in either) trump Conn's wins over guys like Lesnevich, Zale and Zivic. Manny also rose through the weights in a way we haven't seen since Duran and Armstrong. I'm not a fan of idiotic pac tards claiming he is the ebst fighter ever, but he is a better fighter than Conn was.Comment
-
Thats fine, I can respect that. Im looking for he guys who would blindly put Pac on a pedestal without actually knowing what they're comparing him too. I figured Conn is a name most have heard of so Paquiao's nuthuggers should have no problem telling me why Manny should be ranked higher. See, things like this aren't so easy when you can't just blurt out where a fighter should be ranked without backing it up.Comment


Comment