Wilder fans... how do you justify continuing being a fan

[Robbie Barrett]

You're exactly right.

There were 3 consensus top heavyweights: 2 of them with belts and 1 who was the lineal champion.

Two of them fought each other and the third one lost to a fat guy and to a cruiserweight. Those are just the facts.

Why you lying? Fury wasn't top 3 when he first fought Wilder. Joshua had already beat #3.

XoNrAFV.png

[ShoulderRoll]

Why you lying? Fury wasn't top 3 when he first fought Wilder. Joshua had already beat #3.

XoNrAFV.png

Fury was (and is) the lineal champ in the eyes of most boxing observers.

[Stuntman Mike]

When Wilder laced them up is irrelevant. He could knock a house down and would have KO's Mike Tyson 10/10 times.

Yes, has outboxed everyone except Fury, the greatest of all time, and Ortiz, a Cuban legend.

Yes, Wilder was behind on points vs the Cuban legend.

Yes, Wlad beat Jennings 11-1 in rounds.

Belt defences mean nothing, it's all about great wins. Wilder, Wilder, Wlad, Cunningham, Chisora 1.0, Chisora 4.0, Super Wallin, and more.

The division is the best it has ever been. So glad to be so far past the dark days of the 90s era. Nash out.

I need to intervene and speak to your acid dealer but I fear its far too late

[deathofaclown]

Why you lying? Fury wasn't top 3 when he first fought Wilder. Joshua had already beat #3.

XoNrAFV.png

Nobody cares about journalists rankings,

Everyone knew Fury was a top heavyweight that dethroned Wlad, He was simply not at the very top of the rankings because of his hiatus, not ability.

That’s the problems with casuals like you, You have to use journalists opinions and lists and eat the warm diarrhoea that Eddie Hearn and Adam Smith feed you instead of actually having the boxing knowledge to understand reality

[Nash out]

I need to intervene and speak to your acid dealer but I fear its far too late

Everything I said is correct, and we must respect Nash. Nash out.

[Get em up]

Um... I agree with everything except the "lack of intelligence" portion. that's a weird thing to say, just based on excuses. We've seen a thousand fighters give excuses. Pacquiao, one of the greatest ever, but... when he's lost had no shortage of excuses. Does he have a lack of intelligence as well?

No not so much that and maybe lack of intelligence is a bit harsh. I base that statement off of various things he has said done throughout the years that leads me to think he isnt the brightest crayon. Not that I hold that against the guy cause undoubtedly he is entertaining as hell.

[iamboxing]

I'm a fan of Wilder for the entertainment value he brings to fights. I'm not a fan of his excuses and ignorance but I expected that when he lost due to his obvious lack of intelligence. It's hard to say he is a hype job considering the consensus #1 heavyweight is the guy he lost to. At that rate how can anybody call him a hype job because he lost to the best in the division.

This. I don't care about records at this point. That whole undefeated record that's infested the sport since Mayweather can seriously **** off.

[KingGilgamesh]

There's a few fighters with a better resume than Wilder, beaten better fighters than Wilder has. Wilder is ****. Fury wasn't top 3 when he fought Wilder the first time. Again he's ranked where he is by beating the least skilled title holder ever, someone that never proved to be top of the division.

Except Fury has always been considered the best in the division for years. Even during his hiatus. Isn't it sad that you can't have an opinion not fed to you by Hearn. That's why you've become a laughing stock on this forum now.