...
hold on !!
so... he was tested unexpectedly, outside the normal window... which is why you are saying he got caught, right?... they caught him unaware, is what you are saying... and yet, the amount of clenbuterol in his system was so tiny... that it is now considered legal, following the WADA rule changes...
1)
if Canelo got "busted" doping, outside the normal testing window... then why was the amount of clen in his system so tiny that it would not even trigger a positive now that WADA have adjusted the tests?
2)
Q. why did Canelo's performance improve in the rematch, when we know he was clean? ... I NEED THIS QUESTION ANSWERED
A. either... clen does nothing, and is totally over-rated... because Canelo improved on the benefits of supposedly "doping" in THE VERY NEXT CAMP, just with hard work... or... it was accidental contamination
take your pick
not only are bread's su****ions not based on evidence... his su****ions are not even based on likelihood
nothing to see here
...
Then his biggest rival and his team, Tested Canelo outside of the normal window of 8 weeks. They were set to fight in May and he was tested in February and just so coincidently he tested positive! Really!
hold on !!
so... he was tested unexpectedly, outside the normal window... which is why you are saying he got caught, right?... they caught him unaware, is what you are saying... and yet, the amount of clenbuterol in his system was so tiny... that it is now considered legal, following the WADA rule changes...
1)
if Canelo got "busted" doping, outside the normal testing window... then why was the amount of clen in his system so tiny that it would not even trigger a positive now that WADA have adjusted the tests?
2)
Q. why did Canelo's performance improve in the rematch, when we know he was clean? ... I NEED THIS QUESTION ANSWERED
A. either... clen does nothing, and is totally over-rated... because Canelo improved on the benefits of supposedly "doping" in THE VERY NEXT CAMP, just with hard work... or... it was accidental contamination
take your pick
not only are bread's su****ions not based on evidence... his su****ions are not even based on likelihood
nothing to see here
...
Comment