That may be a factor but the primary fans that harp on that fight are you pac fans who can’t move on and in an attempt to diminish the loss, either minimize Floyd as a boxer (which you did above), make excuses for the loss or deny that it was actually a loss.
It was a loss according to the judges, but it wasn't so convincing like Floyd fans think, to the point a rematch wasn't required.
Floyd fans make excuses for a rematch not being required more than anything. It was a loss, but Floyd fans make the loss to be more significant than it is.
Floyd fans say Floyd would beat Pac 10 out of 10 times, even in Pac s prime. Boxing fans will of course think that's a silly boast, when floyd can't even best past prime pac two times? First win was controversial enough as it is
But a bet is a bet. Do you know what a bet is buddy?
We had one for $20 and you lost. So you literally owe me $20.
Don't reply to any of my posts until you pay me what you owe me otherwise I will just remind you to pay your debts.
I didn't lose. Floyd didn't fight him immediately after
You put up some random quotes i made years ago. It doesn't prove Floyd fought him immediately after.
I don't know maybe if you can prove Floyd fought Shane about a month or two after I made one of those quotes I might send you a dollar for your troubles
Comment