My Prediction: Froch Vs Dirrell

[Freddy Krueger]

Calling Taylor, a guy who has beaten Bernard Hopkins TWICE "dumb" makes you sound like an idiot.

I said he fought dumb, and he did. He admitted it in interviews aswell, and anyone who saw the fight knows that too. If Taylor and Froch fought again, Taylor would win.

[Gorgeous George]

i said froch would beat taylor in the latter rounds after losing the 1st 6 or 7 then his class stamina will come into play and as tayor fades he would ko him.... not many others agreed tho. froch will tko dirrell in round 8 imo.

[Hitman932]

In fact, Froch did everything the hard way, before his fight with Pascal he was taking on tough opposition in Europe and was pretty much unheard of. To win his title he fought a young, hungry and talented fighter. His first Defence wasn't even on british T.V and it was against Jermain Taylor. Froch won this too, but didnt get any credit for it.

Froch hardly deserves commendation for accepting a world title fight in his hometown for a vacant title against a man (Pascal) who avoided Edison Miranda out of fear for his life.

Froch's competition level before that fight certainly was not "unheard of". Maybe "par for the course" is more like it. Robin Reid and Albert Rybacki were corpses. Hell, Reid had been KTFO by the pathetic Jeff Lacy more than 2 whole years prior and had a comeback that had consisted of a close win over a Contender series scrub. The Russian guy showed up for a check, didn't put up a fight, and has never fought since.

Unheard of? Not by European standards.

Dirrell on the other hand is pretty much the websters definition of "hype job" A guy to whom everything, including this title shot has been given on a plate. He has been set up with fighters tailor made for him, (short, plodding and slow with poor stamina) and has never once fought a real fighter.

Dirrell hasn't been given anything and the reason he has fought the guys he has fought are because they were the only people who would accept a fight with him. The only reason that Froch is fighting Dirrell is because it is his mandatory challenger anyway and he is obligated to do it. Andre Dirrell is not the guy any manager matches up their undefeated prospect with to test if they are the real deal.

Dirrell is a child in my eyes, a spoilt brat who is going to enter the ring with a man against froch.

This is just funny. Dirrell grew up dirt poor in one of the nastiest places anyone could ever have to live. He has no real money, hasn't been given anything, has been avoided when it comes to big fights and has a hunger that Froch has long since forgotten. This will be the one thing that impresses people most come fight night. Andre Dirrell will step up and show that not only is he the better boxer, but that he is The Man in the ring.

If Dirrell can beat Froch i will congradulate him on coming of age and registering a great win. I don't see it though, instead i see a simmilar story to Calzaghe/Lacy, that of a scared looking figure getting destroyed and losing his manhood in front of a hostile crowd.

Prediction: Froch KO7

Well get a congratulatory speech ready my friend.

The fight will actually play out just like Mosley-Margarito with Froch walking into every single punch Dirrell throws, sometime 3 or 4 at a time. As Margarito showed, even fighters with great chins can only take so much punishment and so many clean blows.

Dirrell TKO corner stoppage after 9 rounds.

[BetterCallSaul]

I said he fought dumb, and he did. He admitted it in interviews aswell, and anyone who saw the fight knows that too. If Taylor and Froch fought again, Taylor would win.

He didn't fight dumb at all. Taylor was impressive until around the 9th round, he just run out of steam. Lesser fighters like Lacy can't capitalise on this, but strong, fit, and powerful fighters like Froch can. Thus he landed a monster shot early on in round 12, and Taylor was gone. If Taylor fought any differently, that shot would have come sooner.

[Яша]

This is just funny. Dirrell grew up dirt poor in one of the nastiest places anyone could ever have to live. He has no real money, hasn't been given anything, has been avoided when it comes to big fights and has a hunger that Froch has long since forgotten. This will be the one thing that impresses people most come fight night. Andre Dirrell will step up and show that not only is he the better boxer, but that he is The Man in the ring..

people living in american ******s would be rich compared to people living in african, russian, asian and south american ******s, so don't give me that ****.

and stop talkin about it like ts such a shure thing, this is boxing anything can happen. you are looking like a biased fool when you say stuff like "This will be the one thing that impresses people most come fight night. Andre Dirrell will step up and show that not only is he the better boxer, but that he is The Man in the ring" you are acting like you know it all and thats exactly like it will go down lmao. when in reality you can't say anything is for shure.

[Hitman932]

people living in american ******s would be rich compared to people living in african, russian, asian and south american ******s, so don't give me that ****.

Which one of those is Carl Froch?