I know you and I have (respectfully) jousted over Ortiz in the past. I think the issue over King Kong is the narrative that he's some avoided and dangerous fighter, which I think is humorous. Ortiz is a decent fighter but his resume is pretty weak for the reputation some annoint him with.
I've never heard a narrative implying Whyte or Martin were avoided fighters...in fact, I've heard more that they are "bums", a phrase I hate and a label I think is incredibly inaccurate. Whyte is a flawed fighter but he is game to fight anyone and his resume shows that (even if some of his wins should have an asterisk mark). Martin gets slagged for some of his wacky comments and getting blasted out by AJ but he is better than his performance that night, in my opinion at least.
I don't think this is some golden age in HW boxing but we often look back on previous eras with nostalgia. Its incredibly difficult to compare eras because circumstances were different.
I've never heard a narrative implying Whyte or Martin were avoided fighters...in fact, I've heard more that they are "bums", a phrase I hate and a label I think is incredibly inaccurate. Whyte is a flawed fighter but he is game to fight anyone and his resume shows that (even if some of his wins should have an asterisk mark). Martin gets slagged for some of his wacky comments and getting blasted out by AJ but he is better than his performance that night, in my opinion at least.
I don't think this is some golden age in HW boxing but we often look back on previous eras with nostalgia. Its incredibly difficult to compare eras because circumstances were different.
Comment