that's because there isn't room for a competent boxing fan to think Pacquiao won. Seriously, if you appreciate the sweet science and understand boxing, that was clear and I'm usually not a hard-stance kind of guy
EDIT: competent isn't the right word. Sober might be, though
Im far more competent than cvnts like you,that I can assure you,you shouldn't be able to win pro fights by throwing 1 weak jab to your opponents several mix of punches,Ugas disgraced boxing by getting outworked 2-1 by a 42 yr old
Im far more competent than cvnts like you,that I can assure you,you shouldn't be able to win pro fights by throwing 1 weak jab to your opponents several mix of punches,Ugas disgraced boxing by getting outworked 2-1 by a 42 yr old
I didn’t score the fight but it looked to me like a wide decision win for Ugas. Pac might’ve won between 1 and 4 rounds….and I’m being generous. I have a hard time seeing anyone truly believing Pac won. Nobody in the last 20 years has beat Pacqiuao so clearly except Marquez. Ugas did better than Mayweather, though this was a much more faded version of Pac.
It doesn't surprise me that most of y'all who wanted Pac to lose think Ugas looked good,Pac was far busier, the ring general,landed the best power shots & Ugas fought like a cuban(no effort but was ready to cry robbery anyways like they do)
Comment