Originally posted by Elotero
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Roach: Pacquiao Only Wants The Best Opponents, To Fight at The Top Level
Collapse
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostIf I am correct, Manny and Conor have both acknowledged there was a plan for them to fight so I’m not sure if Roach knows what he’s talking about.
"For me, money will follow but my concern is the fans, how to make the fans happy. I don't pick a non-boxer opponent. I want to pick the very best. So that we can claim that we are the best," said Manny Pacquiao.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elotero View PostThat's rich. Meanwhile scouting fighters coming out of car accidents, need to come up in weight, coming off surgery/layoffs, coming off a KO/Loss. Pathetic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
He’s also said other things so while I understand you’re going to cherry-pick statements like this, both Manny and Conor acknowledged there was a plan for them to fight. To suggest otherwise is dishonest.
Comment
-
If that was the case he would have been chose Spence instead of scouting out Conor and Mikey for a year.
But oh well, we have a great fight coming
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ryannn View Post
What's with this newb fan thinking that a fighter losing means that any wins against that fighters has no merit?
When fighters take enough risks, they lose. They don't magically lose their skills or accomplishments when they lose their undefeated record.
This is why top guys are ducking each other. It is more important for boxers nowadays to be undefeated than face the very best competition available.
Thanks a lot, Floyd
Comment
-
The key is what Roach said preceding the comment " If Manny Wins " he wont fight a nonboxer......... that says if he loses he will fight a non boxer, we already know he was signed to fight McGregor before Connor got stopped.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ryannn View Post
What's with this newb fan thinking that a fighter losing means that any wins against that fighters has no merit?
When fighters take enough risks, they lose. They don't magically lose their skills or accomplishments when they lose their undefeated record.
This is why top guys are ducking each other. It is more important for boxers nowadays to be undefeated than face the very best competition available.
Thanks a lot, Floyd
The assumptions and connotations put forward from fans is so false in the real world it's a joke.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KillaMane26 View PostIf that was the case he would have been chose Spence instead of scouting out Conor and Mikey for a year.
But oh well, we have a great fight coming
Comment
Comment