The original question being who's career was better I'm gonna go with Khan. He made more money and that's what a career is about.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Whos career was better Amir Kahn or Danny Garica ?
Collapse
-
-
Danny had the better resume but Khan had the better career. Khan's opponents were all primed while Garcia's opponents were all cherry picked. Amir Khan took on more risky opponents than Danny Garcia.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MikeyMike100 View Post[/B]
What do you mean by this?
What matters is when fighters fight.
Overall Amir Khan world wide has been one of the premier fighters in boxing. He has overachieved, and had a great career. He has better wins than Danny Garcia, but worst loses.
I would say they are level, only because of Amir Khan's Olympic Silver Medal 'There would be no issue if people rated Garcia's overall career better'.
Comment
-
Dsg !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...................... ..
Danny-Garcias-Dad-Turnt-Up.gifLast edited by Brother Mouzone; 07-30-2021, 07:52 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by champion4ever View PostDanny had the better resume but Khan had the better career. Khan's opponents were all primed while Garcia's opponents were all cherry picked. Amir Khan took on more risky opponents than Danny Garcia.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post
Yeah, Thurman, Porter, Spence are all high cherry picks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post
Yeah, Thurman, Porter, Spence are all high cherry picks.
The fact Danny KO'd Khan counts a lot here when neither were great fighters. Khan has some good wins but so does Danny and Danny has the tiebreaker in actually beating Khan in brutal fashion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
This only signifies that he was a protected fighter. His only three losses came to good fighters in their primes. He only has two wins against good opponents in their primes on his resume and they are Amir Khan and Lucas Matthyssemxtali likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment